case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2013-11-26 06:48 pm

[ SECRET POST #2520 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2520 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.












Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 039 secrets from Secret Submission Post #360.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: yourfaveisproblematic

(Anonymous) 2013-11-27 01:24 am (UTC)(link)
You mean something besides playing Loki?

In all honestly I would expect that to be problematic enough for the kind of SJW that blog is geared for.
kaijinscendre: (Default)

Re: yourfaveisproblematic

[personal profile] kaijinscendre 2013-11-27 01:25 am (UTC)(link)
Hm. They HAVE said people were problematic for some of the roles they take.

Re: yourfaveisproblematic

(Anonymous) 2013-11-27 01:37 am (UTC)(link)
They think appearing as a fictional character who does "problematic" things, even if they make sense in context and are even portrayed as BAD, makes the actor portraying that character equally problematic. Like John Slattery doing blackface and singing "Swanee" in Mad Men is listed. Context is NOT for the weak and characters ≠ their actors.