Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2013-11-30 03:25 pm
(no subject)
⌈ Secret Post #2524 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

Notes:
Secret Santa sign-ups go up tomorrow! There will be a post explaining everything again/open to questions, too. Keep an eye out! :)
Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 073 secrets from Secret Submission Post #361.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-11-30 08:38 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
As to the actual secret: inorite. Even the best of canon Holmes/Watson shippers regularly throw in some line (or even a whole paragraph) about how Watson did not really love Mary or how their relationship was just convenient for Watson to cover his love for Holmes. I'm not joking, I've seen it in otherwise good fics by good authors. It's RAGE and instant backbutton for me, not only because I hate Mary bashing, but also because I consider it a sign of cheesy, bad writing (the way I see it, a story may be good in every other regard, but this particular line/paragraph is cheesy, bad writing. And then it diminishes the value of the rest of the work for me).
no subject
OTOH of course I may not qualify as among "the best of canon Holmes/Watson shippers", heh. But I've seen plenty of others who don't do this, and I cheer them on. You can love more than one person. Simples.
* maybe-sort-of in the first thing I ever wrote, but determinedly never since
no subject
I'm not all that much into romance, so I may be missing out on some really fine examples. But I've seen a few people who do not do that at all; and in my books, you are a pretty good writer. So, it is not an omnipresent tendency. I suppose it simply upsets me a lot.
You can love more than one person. Simples.
Exactly. Bisexual (or otherwise-straight-but/otherwise-gay-but) Watson who has loved Mary and now loves Holmes=well done.
no subject
Bisexual Watson every time for me.
no subject
I dunno. I may be oversensitive to this because it used to occur so damn frequently in oldschool Kirk/Spock from Star Trek TOS -- people making a big point of saying "oh noes Kirk totally did NOT love Edith Keeler. And he totally did not even love Miramee even though he had amnesia at the time. Also, he wasn't actually even friends with Gary Mitchell, even though that pairing is non-canon." And other bullshit.
no subject
I think childish/immature is the right way to describe why this trope rubs me so wrong in general. Especially because if you want to achieve the same "my OTP is the best, most special love" effect, IMO it's a lot more realistic (and less creepy of the character) for them to be like, "Yes, I loved X, but my love for you is different/stronger/more full of lust/more likely to last the rest of my life/whatever else applies." Because every love IS different, and, depending on the situation a lot of shippers will probably agree that the OTP love is the most soul-matey or whatever else. And that's fine. That happens. People find the one person they love THE MOST, or want to spend their life with for whatever other reason. But that doesn't mean all their past loves are invalid.
no subject
(Also IDGAF if they only met a couple days before and barely know each other and really should not be falling in love that quickly -- that scene near the end with Watson and Mary and that godforsaken treasure chest is one of my favorite romantic scene in any book I have ever read. Like, ever.)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-11-30 09:52 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-11-30 10:11 pm (UTC)(link)I mean seriously, insulting Watson's writing and then immediately following it by droning for a page and a half about how this random French asshole was so much better a writer than Watson and so much better a detective than Watson and was so much better at praising Holmes without bitching about his cocaine than Watson? I'm surprised Watson didn't just tell him to go move in with his stupid French translator guy if he liked him so much.
At least Holmes was adorable for the rest of the book, but damn.
no subject
LOL, excellent.
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-11-30 11:25 pm (UTC)(link)Also, I think the space suited them at the time, showed that they were real, genuine friends, not just friends-because-they-were-roommates-who-would-drift-apart-otherwise. It also made Holmes admit that he needed friends and forced him to actually take initiative and seek out Watson and ask him to come on investigations with him rather than just assuming he'd come following after Holmes.
And it made their reunion after the hiatus more believable because it was a completely independent choice, not a matter of convenience or habit. And from a shipping perspective, it gave them the opportunity to re-fall in love properly after the hiatus/showed Holmes he couldn't just push Watson around and neglect him if he wanted to keep him.
no subject
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-12-01 03:55 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-11-30 11:28 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-11-30 11:52 pm (UTC)(link)Secret 2 - The Sign of Four (Sherlock Holmes novel)
Not Secret: I'm a huge Holmes/Watson shipper.
Secret: Holmes was such an unappreciative passive-aggressive pill at the start of The Sign of Four that I totally cheered when Mary stole Watson away with her sweetness and left Holmes all alone.
Secret Because: Fanfic has assured me that these two opinions are incompatible, for some reason.