Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2013-12-08 03:47 pm
[ SECRET POST #2532 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2532 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 065 secrets from Secret Submission Post #362.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Oh the complexities of diversity...Also, for those who've seen the movie...
On the other hand - you're write, they're not exactly 'POC' in the media-conventional sense.
Now, Frozen is subject to two problems - people who wanted POC in it (which is a "this is a piece of American/Western media" problem) and people who wanted Sami in it (which is a "despite all the artistic license, this is still based on a specific European culture and area with an exploited minority in it and in the movie" problem). These probably started out as two separate issues, but Tumblr being what it is conflated them into one big clusterfuck.
SJW madness at its worst: they have legitimate points, but they've warped it so much that it's impossible to deal with those points without detangling layers of misconceptions and misinformation.
At least I presume so - I was more focused on Frozen's gender problem. And on that note - to the people who've seen the movie: I've heard quite a bit about how the production cut out almost all of the female characters from the original story and put in an some extra male characters that many saw as unnecessary. But I've also heard hints of some good things about the two female leads that were there (did it pass the Bechdel test? IDK). What are your thoughts on it?
Re: Oh the complexities of diversity...Also, for those who've seen the movie...
(Anonymous) 2013-12-09 04:44 am (UTC)(link)Re: Oh the complexities of diversity...Also, for those who've seen the movie...
(Anonymous) 2013-12-09 06:07 am (UTC)(link)Re: Oh the complexities of diversity...Also, for those who've seen the movie...
(Anonymous) 2013-12-09 06:34 am (UTC)(link)...I think it was just a joke
Re: Oh the complexities of diversity...Also, for those who've seen the movie...
(Anonymous) 2013-12-09 12:55 pm (UTC)(link)ahaha yeah I meant that as in "I can't think of any instance of two men talking to each other about something other than a woman, draw your own conclusions!" because that movie passes the bechdel test with flying colors. I didn't mean I was actually worried about male bechdel tests?
Re: Oh the complexities of diversity...Also, for those who've seen the movie...
(Anonymous) 2013-12-09 05:32 am (UTC)(link)Re: Oh the complexities of diversity...Also, for those who've seen the movie...
(Anonymous) 2013-12-09 05:54 am (UTC)(link)Re: Oh the complexities of diversity...Also, for those who've seen the movie...
With flying fucking colors. There are maybe three or four points in the movie where the sisters mention men at all when they're talking to each other. Every other conversation is either them playing as kids, or talking about the serious effects of Elsa's power. It's really, really brilliant in that respect.
Re: Oh the complexities of diversity...Also, for those who've seen the movie...
Re: Oh the complexities of diversity...Also, for those who've seen the movie...
(Anonymous) 2013-12-16 04:16 am (UTC)(link)