Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2013-12-15 03:37 pm
[ SECRET POST #2539 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2539 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 066 secrets from Secret Submission Post #363.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-12-15 09:17 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-12-15 09:22 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-12-15 09:23 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
Same with OP's confusion about "why can't we just have dominant characters with biologically normal vaginas?" We can! There's plenty of biologically-unremarkable F/f and F/m BDSM fic to go around! But one of the kinks A/B/O appeals to is a certain brand of penetration/size kink, and there's no logic in saying "why does all this fic catering to Kink X have to have Kink X in it? Don't you realize that it's possible to write fic without Kink X?"