Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2013-12-17 07:02 pm
[ SECRET POST #2541 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2541 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 040 secrets from Secret Submission Post #363.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-12-18 12:15 am (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-12-18 00:50 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-12-18 11:04 (UTC) - Expandno subject
no subject
Which is to say I feel you OP.
no subject
I mean, I'm the first to admit that stuff I write is just a collision of different things that interest me, picked up from both fiction and non-fiction sources. It's not something I try to do, but I think it's something that happens when anyone writes anything, and the people who feel like you're borrowing too much from? Did the exact same thing, consciously or not. It's kind of how stories work. The components have been seen a million times before, but the way you approach them and put them together is all your own.
And I think that's how it should be. Fiction is one of the best ways to share the things that grab you with the world. It's like taking something cool, playing with it for a while, and then putting it back as something brand-new.
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-12-18 12:31 am (UTC)(link)I WANT TO READ THIS.
GET ON IT, OP!
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-12-18 00:37 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
In which I once again advocate finding something to disagree with
Re: In which I once again advocate finding something to disagree with
Re: In which I once again advocate finding something to disagree with
(Anonymous) - 2013-12-18 00:48 (UTC) - ExpandRe: In which I once again advocate finding something to disagree with
(Anonymous) - 2013-12-18 01:15 (UTC) - ExpandRe: In which I once again advocate finding something to disagree with
Re: In which I once again advocate finding something to disagree with
(Anonymous) - 2013-12-18 05:38 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2013-12-18 12:41 am (UTC)(link)Secret 1 - Original fiction writing
I want to write original fiction, but every time I try to come up with a concept I end up breaking it down in my mind to its component pieces. Things like "My Take on the Dresden Files" or "Allen Quartermain meets Lovecraft" or "Dune but set in Twilight Imperium".
Then it feels too much like Alternate Universe or crossover fic, and I just cease to take the idea seriously. I mean, I know "nothing new under the sun" and so on. I could try writing it anyways and then filing off the serial numbers, I guess...
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-12-18 12:46 am (UTC)(link)...dude no wonder you are in this state
stop reading that site, it is no good for your writing soul
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-12-18 09:44 (UTC) - Expandno subject
Really the distinction between the two isn't so important, unless you're planning to professionally publish it, then yeah you'll probably want the former kind of story and not the latter. :p
no subject
Just write whatever you want and put love into your craft.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-12-18 02:12 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-12-18 03:12 (UTC) - Expandno subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-12-18 01:08 am (UTC)(link)Stop thinking "my take on X". Start thinking "X but better." X, except if it took into account Y instead of just ignoring it. X, but with some of the stylistic elements from Z. If it's Allan Quatermain plus Lovecraft, don't think you're just imitating Allan Quatermain except there's things that are squamous and rugose (although you could do that and it would probably sell pretty well) - think about what it would mean for Allan Quatermain to live in a Lovecraftian world, about the ways that those two things link up, about the deeper logic behind them. Then it's not just an AU where Quatermain punches out Cthulhu (again, I would read this), it's an original talk on the legacies of both.
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-12-18 01:20 am (UTC)(link)My understanding has always been, if you're ripping off one person, it's plagiarism. If you're ripping off many.... it's research.
Write on! Write on! (Pun only somewhat intended.)
no subject
if you just sit around waiting for THE BEST IDEA to strike you're never gonna get anything done (trust me, I did this for 4 miserable and depressing years and now I'm trying to make up for lost time)
nobody is looking over your shoulder while you're writing
and trust me every author out there was inspired by something else, Shakespeare ripped off stories constantly, most literature technically qualifies as fanfic and there are lots of current stories that are pretty much fanfic of public domain works (Pride & Prejudice and Zombies, Wicked, etc) and you can always change stuff
good luck!
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-12-18 01:43 am (UTC)(link)...and the character himself was inspired by RDJ's character in "Kiss Kiss Bang Bang"--although at the end of the day he is nothing like Harry Lockhart.
Write what you love, because everything is derivative of something else.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-12-18 01:52 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-12-18 04:05 am (UTC)(link)Star Trek was "Wagon Train in space."
+1
(Anonymous) - 2013-12-18 12:31 (UTC) - Expandno subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-12-18 05:51 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-12-18 08:45 am (UTC)(link)Many people have said versions of "The Dresden files are Buffy the Vampire Slayer staring Philip Marlow".
Obviously they're talking about the series BtVS, but that itself came from the original movie, which I would personally say is "Salim's Lot staring Barbie".
Then we look at Salims Lot, and realize that it is various clippings from "Dracula" combined with Lovecrafts work. Then we follow the Lovecraft theme and try to track it through the rest of Steven Kings work and get totally lost.
TL;DR It's the DNA of stories you're talking about. All stories, when broken down, can be clearly seen as the products of their parents, Your stories parents are Lovecraft and Quartermain? That's fine, it's the way writing works. You might want to make sure Steven King hasn't already done that combination yet, though.
A thought semi related to above ramblings: Are tropes are nothing more than family resemblances?
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-12-18 12:27 pm (UTC)(link)of course books are a different animal, but let me assure you this kind of thinking will not make or break you creatively. so long as you know it's merely a simple way of explaining it and not a guidebook to your canon, it will not hurt you.
hey don't worry
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-12-18 21:56 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-12-24 02:13 (UTC) - Expand