case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2013-12-23 07:02 pm

[ SECRET POST #2547 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2547 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.



__________________________________________________


11.














Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 043 secrets from Secret Submission Post #363.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2013-12-24 12:16 am (UTC)(link)
Don't worry. If they do follow canon, Watson will get married again. Maybe even multiple times!

(Anonymous) 2013-12-24 12:35 am (UTC)(link)
Yeah, but what if you like MARY, specifically? Female characters aren't interchangeable.

Plus, they're not strictly following canon for other timeline stuff, so there's no reason to think they'll be strict about this either.
ninety6tears: jim w/ red bground (trek: jim & pike)

[personal profile] ninety6tears 2013-12-24 12:47 am (UTC)(link)
Missing the point much?

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-12-24 06:05 (UTC) - Expand
gondremark: (Default)

[personal profile] gondremark 2013-12-24 03:38 pm (UTC)(link)
If they follow canon, you won't be quite certain how many times Watson has been married, nor where his bullet wound is.

(Anonymous) 2013-12-24 12:19 am (UTC)(link)
I feel the same, I loved Mary in the movie!

I wish people were more sensible about their shipping. Some people went "Well, I don't want to demonize Mary, but I want Holmes and Watson in each others' pants...I know! Threesome!" which seemed very reasonable to me lol.
intrigueing: (Default)

[personal profile] intrigueing 2013-12-24 12:41 am (UTC)(link)
Yeah. Threesomes don't solve everything all the time, but I love that this threesome is popular :)

I honestly really wonder why "Hey, I just found out my fiance who died isn't actually dead! Sorry John, but I love him more than you. Don't worry, Holmes will take care of you." isn't wildly popular in Ritchie-verse slash. It seems like a really excellent solution for everyone that doesn't demonize anyone, kill anyone, or break anyone's heart, but I've never seen it before.

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-12-24 01:08 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] intrigueing - 2013-12-24 03:19 (UTC) - Expand

Secret 9 - Sherlock Holmes (Guy Ritchie movies)

[personal profile] transcriptanon 2013-12-24 12:50 am (UTC)(link)
[Picture is John Watson, as portrayed by Jude Law, and Mary Watson, as portrayed by Kelly Reilly, from the 2009 and 2011 "Sherlock Holmes" movies directed by Guy Ritchie. They are wearing old-fashioned European clothing and saying goodbye as Mary leaves on a car?]

I really, really hope Mary doesn't die in the third movie like she did in canon.

(Anonymous) 2013-12-24 12:57 am (UTC)(link)
I didn't even know there was a second movie.
nightscale: Starbolt (Black Cat face)

[personal profile] nightscale 2013-12-24 01:17 am (UTC)(link)
I agree, I really like her in the films and I don't want her getting snuffed or anything.
elaminator: (Rat Queens: Violet)

[personal profile] elaminator 2013-12-24 01:18 am (UTC)(link)
I haven't seen the second film yet (didn't particularly like the first one) but I still hope they don't kill Mary. Seeing as John had multiple wives though, I bet it'll happen. It's easy drama. (It'll probably happen in Sherlock as well, which, urg...)
kijikun: by iconzicons (Default)

[personal profile] kijikun 2013-12-24 01:36 am (UTC)(link)
I'm not sure they will go with canon though, considering they haven't stuck very closely to canon at all with the RDJ movies.

(no subject)

[personal profile] elaminator - 2013-12-24 01:44 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] kijikun - 2013-12-24 01:56 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] intrigueing - 2013-12-24 03:16 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) 2013-12-24 02:04 am (UTC)(link)
I certainly hope not too! I really like her.

(Anonymous) 2013-12-24 02:10 am (UTC)(link)
Well, her backstory is already different from ACD canon because her parents are alive and she doesn't hire Holmes, so she might live.
j_lunatic: Bitch please (Bitch plz)

[personal profile] j_lunatic 2013-12-24 02:18 am (UTC)(link)
Is it confirmed that they're making a third movie?

(Anonymous) 2013-12-24 02:39 am (UTC)(link)
I also loved Mary and would really appreciate her living.

(Anonymous) 2013-12-24 03:08 am (UTC)(link)
Can we have Mary ditch Watson and run off with Mycroft? Please?

(Anonymous) 2013-12-24 03:20 am (UTC)(link)
Dear lord, Jude Law is one fine piece of ass. *stares at bg pic*

/no other comments
intrigueing: (ten's sentient hair)

[personal profile] intrigueing 2013-12-24 03:43 am (UTC)(link)
This was my main takeaway from this secret, tbh. JESUS CHRIST THAT PROFILE.
rbhudson: (Default)

[personal profile] rbhudson 2013-12-24 03:50 am (UTC)(link)
They're making a third? :(

(Anonymous) 2013-12-24 04:11 am (UTC)(link)
Yup. Why the :( ? You don't need to watch it if you don't want to, and it's not like it'll invade all corners of fandom the way BBC Sherlock does. IMO, for people who do like the movieverse, it'll be fun to see how they conclude the loose ends (*cough* needsmoreMoran *cough*) from the 2nd movie. At the very least, I'll get to look at Robert Downey Jr. and Jude Law for two hours ;)

WHOA

(Anonymous) 2013-12-24 08:19 am (UTC)(link)
Fucking hell! Spolers, ffs!! Jesus Christ is it that hard to throw on a spoiler wanring?!?!
tweedisgood: (Default)

Re: WHOA

[personal profile] tweedisgood 2013-12-24 09:05 am (UTC)(link)
I can only assume this is some kind of joke...

Re: WHOA

(Anonymous) 2013-12-24 10:11 am (UTC)(link)
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

There's your warning, right at the top of the post... if you're actually serious. Also, I think the statute of limitations on spoiler warnings has run out on a canon that's over a hundred years old.

Re: WHOA

(Anonymous) 2013-12-24 10:57 am (UTC)(link)
Is it that hard to use spell check?

Re: WHOA

(Anonymous) - 2013-12-24 11:26 (UTC) - Expand

Re: WHOA

(Anonymous) - 2013-12-24 17:48 (UTC) - Expand