[ SECRET POST #2552 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2552 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.



__________________________________________________


11.














Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 077 secrets from Secret Submission Post #364.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

More Wonder Woman news!

[(Anonymous)]

IDK if anyone remembers, but a while ago there was a thread about Wonder Woman being in the upcoming Man of Steel sequel, and a bunch of people commented with "that actress too skinny to be an Amazon". So I thought I should bring this to everyone's attention:

http://batman-news.com/2013/12/26/gal-gadot-on-wonder-woman-casting-fan-criticism-training-and-more/

Re: More Wonder Woman news!

[(Anonymous)]

I think it's a little unfair that the interviewer presented the question as being about breast size, because that's definitely not what it was about to me at least.

That said, I'm glad to hear that she's planning on putting on some muscle; I hope that it happens that way. I still don't think it's unreasonable to have some suspicion towards the producers and how they want to play the whole thing.

Re: More Wonder Woman news!

[(Anonymous)]

Lots of guys said it, but they're typical asshole internet people, so yeah. I personally don't think she's going to look anywhere near the part, though.

Doesn't change my mind

[insanenoodlyguy]

She's not gonna look the part in time.

Gal Godot is never going to be 6 ft and 165 pounds of Greek-made ass kicking. Especially that first part.

Maybe I'll be wrong. But I'll believe it when I see it.

Re: More Wonder Woman news!

[shinyhappypanic]

it's maybe too late for me to bother adding this (anyone still here? ahaha) but I would love for everyone to check out this video! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fWDHYbW1Et8 I felt like she brought up some pretty good points.

in case she's unfamiliar, this girl in question has some other awesome videos (one about "fake" geek girls for instance). I realize I'm shamelessly advertising her but I feel like she deserves way more views than she gets.

Re: More Wonder Woman news!

[(Anonymous)]

THANK YOU for the plug! I'm watching her videos, and I freaking love her! She's fair, she's funny, she even addresses common complaint and misunderstandings before they happen (like I immediately started thinking, when she mentioned how there are few female-led superhero movies, that someone is going to bitch that she wants to take away their male superheroes! but she instantly says 'nope, nuh uh, not what I'm saying').

She's awesome.

Re: More Wonder Woman news!

[insanenoodlyguy]

Yeah, I don't agree with Angelina entirely on this, but I can always respect her opinions on stuff.

Re: More Wonder Woman news!

[caecilia]

She kind of convinced me to go see it, and I'm kind of meh on comic movies in general (but a huge part of that is because they're all male-focused).

Also I didn't realize how much I wanted a Batwoman and also a Harley & Ivy movie but I agree with secret 2 on the costume design and I really didn't like the tone of the current DC movies I've seen...so, they'd have to do it right but my definition of right is different from everyone else's definition of right and admittedly I mostly know these characters through cultural osmosis. But current Batwoman is a lesbian, yes? Oh my god can you imagine if they did a quality movie and kept that in and yeah that's never gonna happen is it...

Re: More Wonder Woman news!

[(Anonymous)]

I'm tired of people defending casting choices and character design choices under the banner of feminism, i.e. 'how DARE you criticize this character for wearing such skimpy clothes WOMEN CAN WEAR WHATEVER THEY WANT', which is not the damn point. Women can, real women. But women designed or dressed by men or marketing teams or corporations or anyone strictly to appeal to the male gaze? That's TOTALLY within the ballpark of fair criticism!

Similarly, it's not considered Hollywood chic for women to be well-muscled, and Wonder Woman is well-muscled. Selecting a petite-framed actress to play one of the most muscular pop culture women in the world isn't about diversity of body type, isn't about how women can look however they want and still be badass, it's about Hollywood seeing attractive as the most important female trait, and skinny to be the most important trait in attractive.

Re: More Wonder Woman news!

[(Anonymous)]

But women designed or dressed by men or marketing teams or corporations or anyone strictly to appeal to the male gaze?

What about the lesbian or bi-girl gaze? Or is that clumped under "male gaze"?

Re: More Wonder Woman news!

[insanenoodlyguy]

Usually they aren't the primary target in mind.

Re: More Wonder Woman news!

[caecilia]

Don't get me wrong, I like looking at hot women, but I also identify with the woman I'm looking at and I can tell when she's made to look like a sex object for straight men. I don't like being a sex object for straight men, and I don't like being forced to go along with their sexual fantasies (and this happens to straight/bi women too, sure they get a lot of male eyecandy but the male characters are made to look the way every guy in the audience wants himself to look).

Say I watch a movie with a straight guy friend. Say it was a Hollywood movie and the only female character is there to look hot for the guys. We could agree that she is hot, we might even find the same traits attractive. We could then watch a movie that had a lesbian audience in mind (But I'm a Cheerleader is a good one) and agree that the women are attractive and the sex scene is hot, but the way the women are presented is very different. The way I imagine women, and the way I want to see women on the screen, is closer to But I'm a Cheerleader than basically every image of women I've been exposed to on a daily basis for the past 25 years. I think straight men would benefit from this too because it seems to me that they think only one body type is hot, and there are so many different types of sexiness that they are missing out on.

I hope this made sense, it was really rambly. tl;dr I agree with the anon you were responding to, and I, as a lesbian, want the image of women in movies to change because showing a woman as a person rather than a sex object doesn't necessarily mean she has to be unsexy.

Re: More Wonder Woman news!

[(Anonymous)]

Exactly!

The biggest problem with casting Gardot isn't that she'll do a bad job. It's what it says about the priorities of the people making the film. It says that they care more about how hot the actress playing Wonder Woman is than how she fits the part or how believable she is. It makes me worry about their priorities, and that makes me worry about how the movie's going to come out.