case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2013-12-30 06:38 pm

[ SECRET POST #2554 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2554 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.
[Hobbit movies, Silmarillion]


__________________________________________________



03.
[Ripper Street]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Avengers]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Sekai-ichi Hatsukoi]


__________________________________________________



06.
[Game of Thrones]


__________________________________________________



07.
[Sherlock Holmes/Star Trek: The Next Generation]


__________________________________________________



08.
[Soukyuu no Fafner]


__________________________________________________



09.
[Attack on Titan]


__________________________________________________



10.
[Goo Goo Dolls]
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 050 secrets from Secret Submission Post #364.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 1 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2013-12-31 12:51 am (UTC)(link)
No-one in this thread agreeing with the OP has the least taste or respect for canon Holmes and Watson. Or Star Trek for that matter.

*shakes head in despair*

(Anonymous) 2013-12-31 01:10 am (UTC)(link)
LOLwut? I'm as much of a Canon purist as it's probably possible to be, since I don't really play The Game, but I think the Star Trek: TNG episode being referred to here by OP is actually very inventive, as far as pastiches go. If you haven't seen it, the whole point of the plot is, Data HAS the Canon in his head, and so solves all the mysteries faster than Holmes would/did. So Geordi makes the mistake of asking the computer to create (essentially, though he doesn't use the word) a pastiche that can beat Data the deus ex character for most of the series. It was really a good way to show flaws in Data, as well, because the fact that he had a superior positronic brain, is what did them in. (Almost.)

You want people with no taste, and/or respect for the fandom, nonny? BBC Sherlock is thataway ------>

(Anonymous) 2013-12-31 01:11 am (UTC)(link)
*respect for the Canon I mean. BBC Sherlock has way too MUCH respect for the insane parts of its fandom.

(Anonymous) 2013-12-31 01:11 am (UTC)(link)
LOL, u mad?
intrigueing: (Default)

[personal profile] intrigueing 2013-12-31 01:29 am (UTC)(link)
Dude, respecting canon does not meaning treating it like holy sacrament that can never be taken lightly, played around with, or made fun of. You are everything that gives canon fans (like ME!) a bad name as stuck up pretentious humorless whiny bores with no imagination or appreciation for creativity. Try and remember they're just fictional stories, hmm?

(Anonymous) 2013-12-31 02:00 am (UTC)(link)
Oh ffs, do you realize how ridiculous you look whining at people to stop having fun and enjoying themselves because they're ~not being rigidly canonical enough~?

What is the damn point of being fans of a detective series as fun as Sherlock Holmes or a sci-fi show as fun as Star Trek if you're required to treat them like catechisms?
lunabee34: (Default)

[personal profile] lunabee34 2013-12-31 03:35 am (UTC)(link)
Bless your heart.

(Anonymous) 2013-12-31 04:25 am (UTC)(link)
What, like it's worse than BBC Sherlock? At least the TNG version has more respect for ACD's stories.
riddian: (Default)

[personal profile] riddian 2013-12-31 09:08 am (UTC)(link)
I would be very interested to laugh at hear your thoughts on why the episode is disrespectful to the rest of TNG. It was one of the most engaging episodes to grapple with what makes a person a person, I would count it among my favorites!