case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2013-12-31 06:36 pm

[ SECRET POST #2555 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2555 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.
[Attack on Titan/Shingeki No Kyojin]


__________________________________________________



03.
[The Muppet Movie]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Frozen]


__________________________________________________



06.
[Once Upon a Time]


__________________________________________________



07.
[Dissonance]


__________________________________________________



08.
[Zooey Deschanel]


__________________________________________________



09.
[My Little Pony: Friendship is Magic]


__________________________________________________



10.
[Eona: The Last Dragoneye]














Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 038 secrets from Secret Submission Post #364.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 1 2 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Duck Dynasty

(Anonymous) 2014-01-01 12:23 am (UTC)(link)
Ewwwwwww.
starphotographs: I like him. He kind of looks and acts like one of my characters. (I did not know this when I started liking him!) (Victor (...>:|))

Re: Duck Dynasty

[personal profile] starphotographs 2014-01-01 12:32 am (UTC)(link)
To me, it seems less "gross" and more "what is this, 1890?"

Keep in mind that I'm not defending it or anything. Because, you know, it's not 1890. No one has to get hitched and move to some dismal farm as soon as they finish puberty anymore. :P

Re: Duck Dynasty

(Anonymous) 2014-01-01 12:36 am (UTC)(link)
It wasn't that uncommon in that part of the U.S., in the 1960s. A little bit early, maybe, but back then people didn't necessarily wait much longer than high school to get married.
starphotographs: This field is just more space for me to ramble and will never be used correctly. I am okay with this! (Ginko (default))

Re: Duck Dynasty

[personal profile] starphotographs 2014-01-01 12:44 am (UTC)(link)
It seems like 25+ marriage as the norm is a really recent development, all things considered. My dad's parents were similarly aged when they started a family (in the late 50s), and it doesn't seem like it was considered scandalous or particularly odd or anything at the time.

Re: Duck Dynasty

(Anonymous) 2014-01-01 12:52 am (UTC)(link)
It wasn't. We're talking a time when it wasn't unusual for people to have a job (and not just flipping burgers but a real, job-for-life job with benefits and pension) a house and at least one kid by the time they're 25. It's less common now because people generally don't have the financial stability or time to do that until their 30s.

Re: Duck Dynasty

(Anonymous) 2014-01-01 12:55 am (UTC)(link)
tangent:

There was actually at least one period in... I don't remember, late medieval/early modern England when marriage age jumped up to 25-30, because the couple waited until they accumulated the resources to start a life together. So, it's not a strict upward climb.

Re: Duck Dynasty

(Anonymous) 2014-01-01 01:23 am (UTC)(link)
It was similar in the early 20th century, too. Averaged age at first marriage in the US reached an all-time low for the 20th century around 1960, while marriage rates reached an all-time high at the same time. The falling marriage rates and greater delay of first marriages we've seen since is a return to normalcy, not the major societal problem some people make it out to be.
starphotographs: (Stein (being earnestly pedantic))

Re: Duck Dynasty

[personal profile] starphotographs 2014-01-01 02:13 am (UTC)(link)
Interesting thread is interesting! Thanks, anons.