Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2014-01-23 06:43 pm
[ SECRET POST #2578 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2578 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 020 secrets from Secret Submission Post #368.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-01-23 11:58 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-01-24 12:06 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-01-24 00:30 (UTC) - ExpandOP
(Anonymous) - 2014-01-24 00:39 (UTC) - ExpandRe: OP
Re: OP
(Anonymous) - 2014-01-24 02:30 (UTC) - ExpandRe: OP
Re: OP
Re: OP
Re: OP
(Anonymous) - 2014-01-25 03:10 (UTC) - ExpandRe: OP
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-01-23 11:59 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-01-24 12:01 am (UTC)(link)(I just wanted to leave a comment that wasn't passive-aggressively snippy.)
no subject
And yeah, I though that was a pretty common sentiment.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-01-24 12:09 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-01-24 12:09 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-01-24 12:27 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-01-24 03:18 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-01-24 12:32 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-01-24 12:33 am (UTC)(link)... Catcher in the Rye. I type faster than I think sometimes.
no subject
I...uh...really hope you don't mean people think fanfic is better than actual real original literature like Catcher in the Rye O.O
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-01-24 00:42 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-01-24 02:32 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-01-24 00:54 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-01-24 01:02 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-01-24 02:33 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-01-24 05:01 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-01-24 03:35 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-01-24 12:34 am (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-01-24 01:38 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-01-24 02:34 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-01-24 04:39 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-01-24 12:30 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-01-24 01:31 am (UTC)(link)no subject
...And talking about pastiche is still making me want some crackers and spread. I better go to the grocery store soon.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-01-24 04:53 am (UTC)(link)Which is not to say that there aren't some amazing fan fiction writers out there...
no subject
That's what fanfiction does so well, hits niche tastes, and which would never be commercial for published fiction to even try.
A lot of tie-in novels are... not great.
(Anonymous) 2014-01-24 06:38 am (UTC)(link)Oh, and I really liked The Thrawn Trilogy by Timothy Zahn, which was set in the expanded universe of the Star Wars galaxy.
But for the most part, yes, there are fic writers who have written better stories than "official" tie-ins. Of course, fic writers don't have the same restraints placed upon them (some of which I'm sure had an actual formula they had to follow rather strictly).
Re: A lot of tie-in novels are... not great.
(I kept my Star Wars spin-off copies on the same bookcase shelf as my Dostoyevsky, I remember a non-fandom friend coming into my place and wrinkling up her mouth in disapproval at that, which amused me so much.)
But mostly tie-ins are very poor. And let's not even mention the tie-in games - which sink down to abominable. But both are moneyspinners, which is why they exist.
Wasn't there some sci-fi TV series a few years ago where it was leaked that the budget for the series was 30%, with 70% of the money earmarked for tie-in games, novelisations and assorted other merchandise?
Re: A lot of tie-in novels are... not great.
(Anonymous) - 2014-01-25 01:18 (UTC) - Expandno subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-02-25 09:33 pm (UTC)(link)I sometimes wonder if it's partly due to fanon. Fanfic is almost like a crowd sourced affair in that you get commonly accepted fanon growing out of it. It's almost as if fans, as a group, feel out the characters with our many many stories and fanworks. :) And of course people are there because they love the original source material and are not just getting paid for it.
Man, I love fandom. :D