[ SECRET POST #2579 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2579 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________
















[ ----- SPOILERY SECRETS AHEAD ----- ]


















15. [SPOILERS for Shingeki No Kyojin / Attack On Titan]



__________________________________________________



16. [SPOILERS for A Series of Unfortunate Events]




















[ ----- TRIGGERY SECRETS AHEAD ----- ]

















__________________________________________________


17. [WARNING for child sexual abuse]



__________________________________________________


18. [WARNING for pedophilia]

[The Venture Bros.]





















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #368.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[fscom]

03. http://i.imgur.com/UZWEJeL.png

[(Anonymous)]

Headcanon accepted.

[helenadax]

Okay!

[(Anonymous)]

Why not? :D

(Also, DAYum.)

[(Anonymous)]

No shit, Sherlock.

/pun intended but optional

[(Anonymous)]

He'd do anything prettily, especially in that Watson getup. But this imagery is particularly comely, so thanks!

[(Anonymous)]

You know, I don't love these movies but I think Law's character is my favorite Watson to date. He looks the spitting image of a young ACD: http://www.conandoyleestate.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/Young-Dr-Conan-Doyle-1.jpg

[(Anonymous)]

+1 Exactly this. I can't honestly say I unilaterally dislike the movies, because he is just so damn satisfying.

[(Anonymous)]

Law's Watson, I think, does the quiet-delight-at-being-improper thing that canon!Watson always gets such a thrill out of better than anyone else I've seen.

(However, I haven't seen BBC Sherlock, so I don't know if Freeman does it better. But I'm not sure it could be comparable in context anyway -- Victorian propriety is kind of a big variable to consider.)

[(Anonymous)]

Yeah, I'm not 100% sure if it's the modern sensibilities or just their characterization, but I feel like neither of the leads in BBC Sherlock even resemble the original characters.

[(Anonymous)]

I actually think Freeman's Watson is really good, and honestly it's the only thing that I unambiguously like about BBC Sherlock. It might just be that his version lines up really well with my own headcanons and interpretations about the original stories, but I really think that once you adjust for the different time periods, he's very close to the original character. He's brave, intelligent, has similar quirks and attitudes to original Watson... I don't know, he just fits my mental image of the character really well.

Just my 2 cents.

[(Anonymous)]

DA

I personally disagree, but the thing about Watson (and Holmes too) is that they have so many intriguing empty or ambiguous spaces in their characterization that there's loads of room for multiple different headcanons that have equal support (or lack thereof) from canon. I think a big reason everyone liked Law!Watson and Freeman!Watson is because they are both quite different from all their predecessors in several ways, but still canon-compliant in the sense of tapping into and expanding those "what if?" hints.

It's the ones that go explicitly against canon evidence that are the problem...*eyes long history of Rathbone-influenced rubbish*

[(Anonymous)]

but the thing about Watson (and Holmes too) is that they have so many intriguing empty or ambiguous spaces in their characterization that there's loads of room for multiple different headcanons that have equal support (or lack thereof) from canon

This so much.

It can be a positive thing, but mostly I see the whining of people saying 'It's nothing like the original!!1!!' as 'It's nothing like I imagined it to be!!1!!' And I'm not just talking about Sherlock here...

[blueonblue]

He certainly looks dashing.

[elaminator]

I'm not too familiar with the movies or the fanbase for the movies...but I'm pretty sure the majority of the fanbase would agree with you on that one.

[intrigueing]

Well duh.

[(Anonymous)]

The fuck...
I suddenly think so too.
:O
Headcanon worm.....!!

Do you mean he would look pretty giving or the blowjobs themselves would be pretty?

[(Anonymous)]

Or both?

What would be the difference between a pretty and an ugly blowjob? Would one be neat and the other sloppy? I mean, nasty and raunchy isn't necessarily pretty, but that doesn't make it bad.

Re: Do you mean he would look pretty giving or the blowjobs themselves would be pretty?

[(Anonymous)]

Not OP, but he would look pretty giving blowjobs. Especially if he paused while his lips were stretched really wide around the base of the cock of the guy he was blowing, and looked up at the guy through his eyelashes with those blue, blue eyes, silently asking what he should do next.

If you're going to start a smutfic, you'd better follow through with it

[(Anonymous)]

OR ELSE *gives evil eye to WiP writers*

Re: Do you mean he would look pretty giving or the blowjobs themselves would be pretty?

[(Anonymous)]

What are you doing to me, honey. *whimpers*

[(Anonymous)]

GUH. *fans self*

[(Anonymous)]

LOL! Based on what?