Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2014-01-24 06:50 pm
[ SECRET POST #2579 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2579 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
[ ----- SPOILERY SECRETS AHEAD ----- ]
15. [SPOILERS for Shingeki No Kyojin / Attack On Titan]

__________________________________________________
16. [SPOILERS for A Series of Unfortunate Events]

[ ----- TRIGGERY SECRETS AHEAD ----- ]
__________________________________________________
17. [WARNING for child sexual abuse]

__________________________________________________
18. [WARNING for pedophilia]

[The Venture Bros.]
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #368.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: When pro-choice is anti-life
As I said in my reply to myself (posted after you), I was going more after the original post's logical fallacies.
Re: When pro-choice is anti-life
(Anonymous) 2014-01-25 12:42 am (UTC)(link)Because you sure haven't pointed out any IMO.
Re: When pro-choice is anti-life
(Anonymous) 2014-01-25 12:44 am (UTC)(link)Re: When pro-choice is anti-life
(Anonymous) 2014-01-25 12:48 am (UTC)(link)Read their post again and it should become more clear.
Re: When pro-choice is anti-life
'If you're dead, your wishes don't matter.' <-- That's completely opinion. I, in general, think the wishes of the dead do matter. I, of course, don't know what this woman would have wanted in this situation, but neither does anyone who's not personally involved.
Re: When pro-choice is anti-life
(Anonymous) 2014-01-25 12:50 am (UTC)(link)One is them pointing out what they're being accused of by virtue of not agreeing with the pro-choice hivemind, and the way that the issue is being framed.
Two is you having a different opinion to them.
Re: When pro-choice is anti-life
Pro-choice is not a hivemind. Neither is pro-life. They also phrased the 'way the issue is being framed' as "must", implying that "must be a man who hates women" is the only response, which it isn't.
And, in such a legally complicated situation as this, even pro-choice people might want to keep her alive, because she never said she didn't want the baby. There's a pro-life person below who doesn't see the point in trying to keep the baby alive, because it's almost certainly not got a chance outside the womb.
Re: When pro-choice is anti-life
(Anonymous) 2014-01-25 02:21 am (UTC)(link)Bullshit. Organ donor cards, anon--dead people still get to choose what happens to their bodies.