fandomsecrets | [ SECRET POST #2579 ]

⌈ Secret Post #2579 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.

__________________________________________________

02.

__________________________________________________

03.

__________________________________________________

04.

__________________________________________________

05.

__________________________________________________

06.

__________________________________________________

07.

__________________________________________________

08.

__________________________________________________

09.

__________________________________________________

10.

__________________________________________________

11.

__________________________________________________

12.

__________________________________________________

13.

__________________________________________________

14.

__________________________________________________

[ ----- SPOILERY SECRETS AHEAD ----- ]

15. [SPOILERS for Shingeki No Kyojin / Attack On Titan]

__________________________________________________

16. [SPOILERS for A Series of Unfortunate Events]

[ ----- TRIGGERY SECRETS AHEAD ----- ]

__________________________________________________

17. [WARNING for child sexual abuse]

__________________________________________________

18. [WARNING for pedophilia]

[The Venture Bros.]

Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #368.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

What logical fallacies?

Because you sure haven't pointed out any IMO.

How about this one. The baby wouldn't have been extremely deformed if the pregnancy had gone on as planned. As in, if the woman hadn't been deprived of oxygen and become brain dead. There was no point in keeping her on life support when there was almost no hope of the baby even surviving to term/after birth.

That's not the issue that OP has with the arguments though.

Read their post again and it should become more clear.

"If you disagree, you're obviously a man who hates women." <-- Women can be misogynistic, as well.

'If you're dead, your wishes don't matter.' <-- That's completely opinion. I, in general, think the wishes of the dead do matter. I, of course, don't know what this woman would have wanted in this situation, but neither does anyone who's not personally involved.

Those aren't logical fallacies.

One is them pointing out what they're being accused of by virtue of not agreeing with the pro-choice hivemind, and the way that the issue is being framed.

Two is you having a different opinion to them.

OP stated their opinion as fact. I'm not sure if there's a formal name, but that seem pretty fallacious to me. Even if it's not technically a logical fallacy, it's still poor argument. You can't just state your opinion and have it be fact.

Pro-choice is not a hivemind. Neither is pro-life. They also phrased the 'way the issue is being framed' as "must", implying that "must be a man who hates women" is the only response, which it isn't.

And, in such a legally complicated situation as this, even pro-choice people might want to keep her alive, because she never said she didn't want the baby. There's a pro-life person below who doesn't see the point in trying to keep the baby alive, because it's almost certainly not got a chance outside the womb.

Two is you having a different opinion to them

Bullshit. Organ donor cards, anon--dead people still get to choose what happens to their bodies.

[ SECRET POST #2579 ]

Re: When pro-choice is anti-life

Re: When pro-choice is anti-life

Re: When pro-choice is anti-life

Re: When pro-choice is anti-life

Re: When pro-choice is anti-life

Re: When pro-choice is anti-life

Re: When pro-choice is anti-life