fandomsecrets | [ SECRET POST #2596 ]

[ SECRET POST #2596 ]

⌈ Secret Post #2596 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.

__________________________________________________

02.

[Star Trek: The Next Generation]

__________________________________________________

03.

[The Croods]

__________________________________________________

04.

[Elementary]

__________________________________________________

05.

[Final Fantasy XIII]

__________________________________________________

06.

[SCP Foundation]

__________________________________________________

07.

[Philip Seymour Hoffman]

__________________________________________________

08.

[Twin Peaks]

__________________________________________________

09.

[Richard Armitage]

__________________________________________________

10.

[Reign]

__________________________________________________

11.

[The Hobbit]

__________________________________________________

12.

[Hunger Games]

__________________________________________________

13.

[Don't Hug Me I'm Scared]

__________________________________________________

14.

[Teen Wolf]

__________________________________________________

15.

[Panic! at The Disco/Dallon Weekes]

Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 063 secrets from Secret Submission Post #371.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

Hi! Peter and the Wolf is a symphony about a little boy, Peter, and various animals, each of which is represented musically by a certain instrument. Disney made a cartoon of it in 1946.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_and_the_Wolf

The asshole (you) is represented by a sad slide whistle.

This thread is making me laugh.

"Do you even know what Peter and the Wolf is about?" is my favorite new way to ask if someone knows what they talking about. Similar to "Do you even go here?"

Let's make this a trend.

It is the only way to ask someone who clearly couldn't understand the original question.

But I'm happy that I was making you laugh! :)

I don't even know why it was so funny. It really is the only way to ask that question. I think it's just the way I'm imagining you saying it. Like, kind of irritated and incredulous.

Exactly, it is about Peter not Beethoven and the animals do not turn into instruments. But again you lack reading comprehension.

And really: Did you get really confused about Peter and the Wolf? the only one acting like a asshole is you (again).

But the important thing is that you come across as condescending and patronizing as possible. Try to read first before you comment.

Don't be so harsh about chard, most people here know that reading comprehension isn't her strong point.

I always think it's hilarious when she answers disdainfully when she didn't even understand the question right.

Uh okay, I didn't know this. I just wondered why someone would give a false answer and act simultaneously as all-knowing.

Thanks for clarifying, I think I will stay out of arguments like this, seems too much like troll feeding.

So which member of the peanut gallery are you, exactly?

She seems to have understood the question perfectly well.

You, however, seem to have an irrational hatred for a stranger on the internet.

Uh, OP said the instruments turn into animals, not vice versa. Peter and the Wolf is a viable guess based on OP's fuzzy childhood memory and the limited information.

DA

OP wrote about Beethoven and that instruments turn into animals. Peter and the Wolf is not about Beethoven and the animals there are only represented by different instruments.
I don't thinks that's a viable guess.
It doesn't help how chardmonster was phrasing her question at OP.

Dude, really? Fuzzy childhood memory could mean OP is confusing "Beethoven" with classical sounding music in Peter and the Wolf. Fuzzy childhood memory could mean OP is confusing "being turned into animals" with being represented by animals. You are being obtuse. You never thought you remembered something from childhood one way and then it turned out turned out you were mistaken?

Okay, I know the rule is to not explain the joke and I'm sorry chard, if I'm stepping on your toes here.

But that's why she said Did you get really confused about

If someone got really confused about Peter and the Wolf they might imagine it to be a little different, because that's what confused people do.

Chard's original comment was pretty obviously related to the subject and there was nothing assholish about it, since the OP said that they were confused about their memories. You are just having a hateboner for her.

Do you even know what condescension is about?

But again you lack reading comprehension.

Haha, oh wow. Yes, I can't imagine why someone would mention Peter and the Wolf in a thread about a cartoon with musical animals.

Edited 2014-02-11 03:36 (UTC)

(reply from suspended user)

Maybe they're wolf-stans?

All right, full disclosure.

I think you're one of the most intelligent and well-educated people here. I kind of look up to you. Yeah, you give people shit sometimes, but no more than any trolly anon (and sometimes less than the trolly anons). When you legitimately upset someone, you apologize.

I don't know why people hate you. I really don't. I think they're fucking stupid. And I'd rather read one of your posts any day than one of theirs.

Answering to yourself, are you chard...

If you're not:

Chard apologizes very rarely - even when she talks shit and hurts other people.

Some of her comments are so illogical that discussing it with her is impossible because it will fall on deaf ears (she even admitted that she decides for herself if she wants to believe you or not - so of course she's never wrong).

With increased regularity she misunderstands comments and she won't see reason when called out. (I think ill-omened also pointed it out to her).

She's fast to give/call others offensive names.

If she would be so intelligent and well-educated like she wants everyone to believe, she would think first and then write responses. A lot of shit could be avoided. A lot of her comments are also unnecessary and she only makes them to stir up shit. An intelligent and well-educated person doesn't need to do that.

That has nothing to do with hate but with other people trying to show her that her behaviour is not always acceptable. I don't know if she has a problem recognizing this but you literally can't correct her even in the slightest manner without her coming on you (and often her F!S friends are coming too to interfere - always on the same side even if she's wrong)
It doesn't help that she often answers with condescension.

She always wants to have the last word.

So yeah, that all is really annoying and that doesn't make other people stupid.

Re: Does anyone remember this?

chardmonster - 2014-02-12 00:58 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Does anyone remember this?

chardmonster - 2014-02-12 00:59 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Does anyone remember this?

(Anonymous) - 2014-02-12 02:38 (UTC) - Expand

The asshole (you) is represented by a sad slide whistle.

Aaaand just like that you go from defending your interpretation into being an obnoxious cunt.

It's sad I was reading your comment and nodding along, "Huh, yeah I suppose I could see it like...Oh chard why you gotta be such a dick?"

Did you get really confused between Peter and Beethoven?

I'm sad that I wasn't here yesterday but I have the ultimate guide:

Chardmonster's guide to suck at commenting

1. Fail at reading

2. Your question should come across as arrogant and rude as possible (but without swearwords) : "Did you get really confused about Peter and the Wolf?" -> meaning: haha, you're so stupid (instead of i.e. "Did you mean perhaps Peter and the Wolf?")

3. When someone calls you out on your shit, give them an example that confirms(!!) the other commenter

4. Call the other commenter asshole

Result: No real help/answer for the OP; not understanding OP's question

I'm like 98% sure that you're reading a rudeness into Chard's question that she never put there. That question doesn't have to mean "ha ha you're so stupid". It can just mean "Is it a possibility that you're misremembering Peter and the Wolf?" Which is a reasonable response, I think.

Anon's guide to being a pseudointellectual in fandom spaces

1. Accuse people of being unintelligent over a small disagreement

2. Make a hypocritical call for decorum after being incredibly insulting

3. Arrange complaint in list format so as to make information seem substantive

Accuse people of being assholes and insensitive over a small disagreement:

Nice job managing to be an asshole about both myself and pagans, though! There are plenty of ways to say what you did in a sensitive way.

Aha, so it's just you that is allowed to be insensitive!

Going back on your apologies (to case) and still thinking you did no wrong:

People only complained anonymously even though the mod was on their side, which is hilarious, but dropping it

Trolling for now reason:

Anansi is West African, while Coyote was a figure in a few western Native American cultures.

But I'd contend that ignorance is no excuse. Your ignorance of nonwestern mythology combined with your love of a genre more problematic than Game of Thrones makes you a racist rape-apologizer. If you're old enough to type on a message board, you're old enough to know this on your own.

Consider this a callout, 30 Rape Office

Good thing you're never insulting, never trolling, never insensitive etc.
(before you ask: this took 5 min to google)

Re: Does anyone remember this?

chardmonster - 2014-02-12 02:55 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Does anyone remember this?

(Anonymous) - 2014-02-12 02:56 (UTC) - Expand

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only