case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2014-02-23 03:55 pm

[ SECRET POST #2609 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2609 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 076 secrets from Secret Submission Post #372.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 1 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Question about age differences

(Anonymous) 2014-02-24 01:35 am (UTC)(link)
Not touching your rape comment, but curious if you feel the same if it's an older woman dating a younger man?

Re: Question about age differences

(Anonymous) 2014-02-24 01:47 am (UTC)(link)
I'm sure it sounds like a massive double standard, but I don't have a problem with it being the other way around. c+p from above:

/Teen and early twenties is still so young it's practically a child/

exactly right, although I disagree about the genders not being a factor on this. men reach their sexual peak around the ages of 18-20, so I think it's perfectly acceptable, even preferable for women of any age to be attracted to young men and to act on it.

I probably sound like a dirty old woman, but I really don't mean to. this is all based on real studies, and let's be honest, have you ever heard of a young man complaining about the attentions of a more mature woman? have you ever heard any stories about young men who have been used and abused by their older lovers? there is clearly something wrong with an older man who pursues young women, but I don't think we can always say this is the case with older women.

pls tell me this is a troll

(Anonymous) 2014-02-24 01:52 am (UTC)(link)
What. The fuck.

DA

(Anonymous) 2014-02-24 01:53 am (UTC)(link)
Uh yeah, I have. I used to know a guy who was in his early twenties who was hit on by women in their 30s and 40s and he was completely creeped out by it. It's a matter of power imbalance. Personally, I think regardless of what genders are involved, if there is a 10+ year age gap between a relationship with someone who is 18 or in their early twenties, the older party probably doesn't have the best intentions in mind. There isn't a lot of common ground, and the lust for someone who is barely an adult yet is really creepy. I will admit if I meet a couple with this huge age gap that managed to have an even power balance between them and had a lot of common interests, then I would consider them an exception to the rule.

Re: DA

(Anonymous) 2014-02-24 02:06 am (UTC)(link)
it sounds to me like your friend wasn't creeped out by the power imbalance (men of any age rarely even feel that) but more like "ew old women are gross". this 'women should be put down once their breasts start to drop' mentality is endemic in men I'm sorry to say.

Re: DA

(Anonymous) 2014-02-24 02:08 am (UTC)(link)
Ugh, another reason Case should keep IP logging on at all times.

(Anonymous) 2014-02-24 03:53 am (UTC)(link)
...the fuck?

Guys can be just as creeper out as girls when older people hit on them.

You're a fucking hypocrite.

Re: Question about age differences

(Anonymous) 2014-02-24 01:59 am (UTC)(link)
"REAL STUDIES" guys! REAL STUDIES!

Women reach their sexual peek in their teens, dude. Prime child-bearing age. Then again, you're a troll. And, without a doubt, hopelessly single.

DA

(Anonymous) 2014-02-24 02:04 am (UTC)(link)
Anon above is creepy as hell, but so are you.
ariakas: (Default)

Re: Question about age differences

[personal profile] ariakas 2014-02-24 03:12 am (UTC)(link)
Not to drop real science into this, but women reach their peak fertility (i.e. are more likely to become pregnant per cycle) between 22-26. Many cycles in the teenaged years are still anovulatory. Fertility declines very little between 26 to 34, then rapidly after 35 (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmedhealth/PMH0002173/).

In addition, one of the reasons teen pregnancies are considered undesirable isn't merely social, but because of the havoc pregnancy under 20 can wreak on girls' still-developing bodies: increased risks of placenta previa, pregnancy-induced hypertension, premature delivery, significant anemia, and toxemia, as well as being 2 to 6 times more likely to born at a dangerously low birth weight. (http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/ency/article/001516.htm) Women actually have the healthiest children between 25-34, whereas girls aged 14-19 have children with significant health problems at a greater rate than women aged 35-44 (even controlling for education and income). (http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/249961.php)

So it depends what you consider "prime child-bearing age" - most fertile? Early-mid 20s. Healthiest children? Late 20s to early 30s. Teenaged years? Some of the worst for both.

Not sure where or how the "teenaged girls are the most fertile" myth got started, particularly when a simple trip down to Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_and_female_fertility) could dissuade you, but I've seen it all over the place from people (presumably) very unfamiliar with the science and I'm not quite sure how it got started.
gondremark: (Default)

Re: Question about age differences

[personal profile] gondremark 2014-02-24 03:36 am (UTC)(link)
Thanks!
ariakas: (Default)

Re: Question about age differences

[personal profile] ariakas 2014-02-24 03:45 am (UTC)(link)
No problem!

And for the record, the findings are similar for men. Their virility peaks early, but they have the healthiest children (controlling for all other factors) in their late 20s and early 30s, with fathers between 35-44 having healthier children than fathers under 20. Men are still fertile at older ages than women, of course, but like women with extremely advanced maternal age, age linked risk factors start to increase dramatically (e.g. low birth weight, Down syndrome, etc. for older mothers; autism, low IQ, schizophrenia, etc. for older fathers). Peak baby-havin' time appears to be 20-45 for both sexes.

Re: Question about age differences

(Anonymous) 2014-02-24 03:26 am (UTC)(link)
"sexual peek" and "prime child-bearing age" are two different things. Also, teens is not prime child-bearing age.

I mean yeah, troll OP is a troll, but you're not helping by spouting bullshit back at them.

Re: Question about age differences

(Anonymous) 2014-02-24 07:13 am (UTC)(link)
As a hopelessly single person I take offense to this.

We are not all trolls.