case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2014-03-06 07:01 pm

[ SECRET POST #2620 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2620 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.
[My Mad Fat Diary]


__________________________________________________



03.
[Stargate Atlantis]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Andromeda]


__________________________________________________



05.
[True Detective]


__________________________________________________



06.
[Samurai Flamenco]


__________________________________________________



07.
[Star Trek: DS9]


__________________________________________________



08.
[Supernatural]


__________________________________________________



09.
[Wild Adapter]


__________________________________________________



10.
[The Bletchley Circle]


__________________________________________________



11. [ns]


__________________________________________________



12.
[Junior Prom - Prelinger Archives Video]


__________________________________________________
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 015 secrets from Secret Submission Post #374.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
intrigueing: (doctor donna)

[personal profile] intrigueing 2014-03-07 12:27 am (UTC)(link)
Yup.

Come on, go through any fandom comm and count the number of times you see someone who has previously passionately criticized Nice Guy-ism only to turn around and say that Girl/Guy X can "do so much better" than Girl/Guy Y, because falling in love with a specific individual isn't a thing, only grabbing for whoever is as far up some subjectively-codified social ladder as you can reach is.

(The biggest reason this phrase makes me batshit is its reverse implication -- if you have major character flaws, you should settle for someone who treats you like shit.)

(Anonymous) 2014-03-07 04:17 am (UTC)(link)
Yes to all of this. I hate this type of attitude, it's disturbing, especially your last point:

"(The biggest reason this phrase makes me batshit is its reverse implication -- if you have major character flaws, you should settle for someone who treats you like shit.)"

This is closely related to the idea that being in a volatile, dysfunctional, or otherwise unhealthy relationship is better than being single.

"X is the best that Y will ever be able to get, so he/she should just suck it up, because ANYTHING is better than being single." Um, no, no, and no.

"X is a flawed person who has made mistakes or has some less-than-stellar personal attributes, therefore he/she should be grovelingly grateful that ANYONE would deign to be with them." Ugh.