Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2014-03-18 06:43 pm
[ SECRET POST #2632 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2632 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

[Game of Thrones]
__________________________________________________
03.

[Patrick Stump / Fall Out Boy]
__________________________________________________
04.

[Men in Black, Agent Coulson]
__________________________________________________
05.

[Twin Peaks]
__________________________________________________
06.

[Defenders of Berk/How To Train Your Dragon 2]
__________________________________________________
07.

[Lily Allen]
__________________________________________________
08.

[Attack on Titan]
__________________________________________________
09.

[The Brittas Empire]
__________________________________________________
10.

[Panic! at the Disco]
__________________________________________________
11.

[Frozen]
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 037 secrets from Secret Submission Post #376.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
I also side eye women who add the excuse, "Well, I just relate better with boy stuff and interest."
One that is sexist. You are making tiny boxes assigned "boy only interests" and "girl only interests" which is not how the world works. Because you could show me the "girliest" of girls and I will guarantee you that she likes something that would be categorized as being "masculine." And the reverse is true. Find me the "manliest" of men and I will also guarantee you that he likes something that would be categorized as being "feminine." Because people don't live in rigid boxes. And two, you think you are special in that regard, that you like "boy things" that makes you different from every other women? HAH! Because, I hate to break to you, women liking masculine things and doing masculine things is nothing new and has never been new. /END RANT
no subject
no subject
no subject
Not helped, of course, by the fact that everything "boy" is always better. That you can get better treatment by being cool with the guys.
And definitely side-eying young me before a lot of my lady friends got into pink and dresses and belly-dancing, but it's easy (especially if, say, your mother tried to force you into this box) to just decide to mentally code all that "girly" stuff as "shallow enemy things" and dismiss people who are into it.
no subject
no subject
I can believe that you could only have friends of one gender by coincidence, but I agree with everything you say here.
Well, I don't know about that.
Re: Well, I don't know about that.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-03-18 11:28 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-03-18 11:34 pm (UTC)(link)And I know everyone on the internet hates to admit this but MOST people do fall into traditional female/male interests based on their assigned gender. Whether this is because of society being sexist or not, does not matter.
So, out of those 100 women I know, only 7-8 share the "typically male interests" that I enjoy (video games, action movies, crude humor, etc).
I am friends on facebook with a lot of people I went to high school with. Of the females, I can think of two that enjoy video games. I work with 4 women. None of them play video games and don't have any interest in them.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-03-19 12:03 am (UTC)(link)2. Most people may fall in line with SOME traditionally gender-based interests, but almost certainly not all. "They don't share MY interests" is not the same as "They have ONLY girl/boy interests".
3. If you only have a single interest that you use to gauge your friendship compatibility with someone, again, that's your fault. Also, I don't know where you live, but no matter how few people live near you, you obviously have access to the internet. Lots of women on the internet play video games. It's not hard to find some.
There's a point where you actually have to do SOME work to make friends. If you're only interacting with the people life has situated around you, then sure, you may have problems. But that's stupid in the internet age, and it's also can't be applied to Lily Allen, because she's a celebrity and she meets tons of people all the time. You guys don't live in bubbles.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-03-19 00:13 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-03-19 01:36 (UTC) - Expandda
(Anonymous) - 2014-03-19 02:37 (UTC) - Expandayrt
(Anonymous) - 2014-03-19 03:06 (UTC) - ExpandRe: ayrt
(Anonymous) - 2014-03-19 03:31 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-03-19 00:17 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-03-19 00:20 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-03-19 00:19 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-03-19 01:11 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2014-03-19 12:14 am (UTC)(link)When I went to college and was exposed to people outside that particular social and economic bracket and geographic area, I had no trouble making female friends because there were plenty of women there who shared the same interests that I did.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-03-19 00:16 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-03-19 03:08 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-03-19 01:55 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2014-03-19 12:24 am (UTC)(link)Because I'm a girl with mostly stereotypical interests (games, sci-fi, comic books, etc). When I was in high school, my options were limited (partially because there was no internet), but when I was in college (granted, it was a university where like half of us were studying science of one branch or another, so interests might have been skewed a bit?), I ended up with about 2/3 guy friends 1/3 girl friends. And even now, I have found girls who have shared my interests. I find it really difficult to believe you cannot find a single girl that you have things in common with.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-03-19 00:32 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-03-19 00:45 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-03-19 01:19 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-03-19 02:42 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-03-19 16:30 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2014-03-19 12:37 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-03-19 04:54 am (UTC)(link)So nope.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-03-19 05:00 am (UTC)(link)no subject
That is very true, and I agree. People are complex and can have a ton of varied interests.
no subject
I'm biologically male, and I've been a member of a writing club for the past couple years. There have generally been significantly more female members than male members. Counting the transwoman as female, only one of the male members since I joined writes in a genre I'm interested in. (He does this weird alternate history stuff with masked priests and zeppelins, if anyone's curious.)
To be certain, a lot of my favorite authors are male, and some of the folks I get along with well on writing forums say they're male. But speaking generally, it seems like my interests tend to overlap more with what girls like than with what boys like.
no subject
(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-03-19 01:18 am (UTC)(link)Why did you need to specify this? Of course she's female.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-03-19 02:13 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2014-03-19 04:34 am (UTC)(link)(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-03-18 11:53 pm (UTC)(link)SA
(Anonymous) 2014-03-18 11:56 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-03-19 02:53 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-03-19 05:17 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
The comment is not about the women that didn't make a lot of other female friends because of interests, the comment is about women that say "women are such bitches" and trash their own gender before adding, "but I'm not like them!!" possibly citing how they are no longer friends with a lot of other women, which really implies the problem is them, not others.
That's why I also side eye anyone who says that.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-03-19 02:01 am (UTC)(link)(no subject)