[ SECRET POST #2636 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2636 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.
[Pinocchio]













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 086 secrets from Secret Submission Post #377.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 1 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Tropes that irrationally annoy the hell out of you.

[case]

Sure, me too!

There is a whole lot of grey area between Superhero and Murderous Bastard however, which is hardly ever recognized.

How many times does the same villain have to mass murder people before it becomes way more "good," consequentially speaking and thinking of all the poor mooks/civs that have to DIE every time it happens, to metaphorically shoot one guy in the face and end it?

Re: Tropes that irrationally annoy the hell out of you.

[(Anonymous)]

As many times as it takes to reach the next continuity reboot (or next senior editor, which is often the same thing, who'll have a fresh slate of stories and villains) and then we can start again.

Re: Tropes that irrationally annoy the hell out of you.

[case]

It was a rhetorical question, but the way you answered it kinda just proves the point that nothing matters besides making sure there are always people around to fight, regardless of what's good for the actual world or city they live in.

Most superheroes don't do it for me because I personally have a hard time considering them as truly "good" when they constantly (due to plot, writers, etc) end up putting their personal morals or their righteous self-image above what, in practice/utility, is safer for the whole (that they supposedly protect). No, I don't think superheroes should immediately go kill people, of course not. But seriously after like the 4th or 5th escape and mass murder in the same continuity, where they keep just not getting rid of the damn threat when they have the chance, it annoys me when people (as in the fictional civs who keep dying that writers gloss over and readers are supposed to ignore) STILL all think this hero is a great and wonderful person.

Re: Tropes that irrationally annoy the hell out of you.

[(Anonymous)]

The hero(ine) is a wonderful and morally upstanding person (excepting Frozone and Iceman, anyone that freezes things is automatically douche) the fictional courts on the other hand...are flawed as are our own so yay for realism I guess.

Re: Tropes that irrationally annoy the hell out of you.

[case]

So... we disagree? That's ok with me. I'm honestly not sure if you were trying to convince me that this supposed hero(ine) is good by just ?? informing me that in your opinion they are wonderful, but sorry, I think we're just going to have to keep disagreeing here.