case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2014-03-22 03:44 pm

[ SECRET POST #2636 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2636 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.
[Pinocchio]













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 086 secrets from Secret Submission Post #377.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 1 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Pet peeve about use of the word "stan"

(Anonymous) 2014-03-23 01:36 am (UTC)(link)
wow, that is some tumblr level insanity right there. I'm impressed.

Re: Pet peeve about use of the word "stan"

(Anonymous) 2014-03-23 01:41 am (UTC)(link)
Better. I suspect Tumblr's lawyers are not too fond of your usage of their intellectual property as insult, but that is one for the corporate studies folk to fight over.

Re: Pet peeve about use of the word "stan"

(Anonymous) 2014-03-23 02:12 am (UTC)(link)
+1

It's always nice to see from fresh material around here. A+, much better then radfem!anon and others of their ilk. Shine on, you crazy diamond.

Re: Pet peeve about use of the word "stan"

(Anonymous) 2014-03-23 02:14 am (UTC)(link)
Why are you singling out diamonds as praise? Are rubies or emeralds not good enough? That is gem-ist that is! We other precious stones demand equal parity with diamonds, crazy or otherwise.
ext_18500: My non-fandom OC Oraania. She's crazy. (Default)

Re: Pet peeve about use of the word "stan"

[identity profile] mimi-sardinia.livejournal.com 2014-03-23 04:11 am (UTC)(link)
Emeralds are more valuable than diamonds.

Re: Pet peeve about use of the word "stan"

(Anonymous) 2014-03-23 04:13 am (UTC)(link)
DIAMONDS ARE JUST OVERPRICED AND OVERHARDEN PENCIL LEAD!

LONG LIVE THE EMERALDS!
ext_18500: My non-fandom OC Oraania. She's crazy. (Default)

Re: Pet peeve about use of the word "stan"

[identity profile] mimi-sardinia.livejournal.com 2014-03-23 04:22 am (UTC)(link)
May they be loved and protected in their fragile green glory.


(One of the reasons emeralds are more valuable is that they are fragile. It is hard these days to find natural emeralds without flaws or really deep colour. If you want strong-coloured, unflawed emeralds for a low-ish price these days you have to get created ones.)