[ SECRET POST #2636 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2636 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.
[Pinocchio]













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 086 secrets from Secret Submission Post #377.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 1 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Tropes that irrationally annoy the hell out of you.

[case]

That actually annoys me on a separate level - the whole view that superheroes shouldn't be the gods of life and death and "superheroes don't get to decide that" - BUT when it comes to stopping human-level villains like Lex and the Joker by punching through walls and destroying buildings and forcing other people to deal with the collateral damage or accidentally causing gigantic explosions, that's fine. Even if nobody asked them to dive in and start violently heroing.

There's no reason at all to leave it to the cops or the military, because unlike cops and the military, human courts and judges and law systems are... infallible...? For some reason. Why do they respect one institution and not the other? If they respected both and stood down, that'd made sense. If they respected neither, that'd make sense. Respecting one but not the other seems arbitrary and hypocritical. If they're "not above society's laws" why the heck are they diving in to punch bad guys in the face when not officially authorized to do so? That's pretty much going directly above society's laws.

Like there's punching out a guy that's mugging you in self-defense, and then there's patrolling the streets looking for muggers to punch when you're not actually a police officer or anything like that. Not all, but most superheroes are basically vigilantes and vigilantes are kind of the definition of considering themselves above the law. To say they shouldn't be above the law, after doing everything they do, is pretty laughable.

Obviously supernatural SUPERPOWERED threats and all are a different thing, and I mean human-level villains only. But - usually, at least - the only reason a crack team of regular old military/etc can't stop Joker is because he has totally arbitrary Plot Armor that makes it so only Batman can do it. And just because Batman happens to be correct in jumping in when it comes to Joker and his Plot Armor, doesn't mean it's morally right on principle to do so ALL the time.

I get all the arguments for the Plot Armor - it's for the sake of the story et cetera et cetera and I agree with that. Without those tropes, a story of that kind wouldn't be possible. That doesn't mean a different story can't exist in the same genre. These are just things that personally annoy me about the genre as a whole.