Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2014-03-23 03:28 pm
[ SECRET POST #2637 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2637 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 070 secrets from Secret Submission Post #377.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 1 - too big ], [ 1 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-03-23 10:52 pm (UTC)(link)I'm a girl, and I love South Park, but I would not want to play as a girl in this game. It just wouldn't work.
no subject
if the game had been created with a girl pc in mind then the humor of the game wouldn't be based on the pc being male and there wouldn't be any reason not to have a girl pc.
it may not work in the released version of the game, but the publisher/developers could have made a game where it worked.
(for the record, i don't have a horse in this race, i hate south park and i never intend to play the game)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-03-24 02:25 am (UTC)(link)If you hate South Park and haven't played the game, I don't recommend commenting on it. Because it's really something you need to be informed about to comment on. I'm honestly not trying to be rude (please don't read my tone as harsh) but from people who have played the game, even the ones who wanted that female option tend to be a little conflicted about it because they realize all the issues that would have come with bringing a female option into that world.
no subject
it's also a bit curious that you equate hating something with not being informed about it.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-03-24 03:10 am (UTC)(link)I'm sorry if I assumed you were not informed wrongly, but you were speaking in generalities and not specifics of the game or the series, and I'm seeing a lot of that going on in this thread for the sake of representation.
I am all for more female representation in games, I just don't think we should make the mistake of trying to back the wrong horse.
no subject
How much would you like me start questioning your authority on debating about game development? Because quite frankly, that is the only knowledge relevant for the discussion we are having. Because that is why I'm speaking in generalities. This game is not a special case just because it is a game about South Park. The game developers/publisher could have made a game with a playable female character, that is a fact. They made the decision not to do so. Do not absolve them of that decision out of some misguided reverence for the source material.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-03-24 03:31 am (UTC)(link)I would not call it a special case, and yes, they could have made a different story, but I highly doubt it'd be easy to make a story with both a male playable and female playable character. That is the issue. Not even so much that there couldn't be a female protagonist, but because I don't know that there could be one at the same time as the male one. The dialogue, story, and character reactions would all be different if the protagonist was female. This is how South Park runs.
You were responding to a secret and a comment that very much was talking about the rules of the South Park world. If you want to talk about gender inequalities in the gaming industry, go right ahead. But don't challenge specific games unless you know a bit about them.
no subject
Have you actually read my comments or are you arguing against some random strawman that you've thought yourself up?
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-03-24 04:04 am (UTC)(link)I also don't think it's helpful to go into media discussions where you haven't consumed the media and talk about how it should be changed. Critique of media doesn't work that way, you critique it after you've viewed it, not before.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-03-25 04:52 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-03-26 09:00 pm (UTC)(link)