case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2014-03-30 03:34 pm

[ SECRET POST #2644 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2644 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.










Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 062 secrets from Secret Submission Post #378.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Most ridiculous "trigger warnings"?

(Anonymous) 2014-03-30 09:33 pm (UTC)(link)
I don't believe that there's such a thing as a ridiculous trigger warning; anything can potentially become a trigger for someone if it's associated with enough trauma.

That being said, it is ridiculous/unrealistic for someone with uncommon triggers to expect them to be warned for outside of very specific contexts.

Re: Most ridiculous "trigger warnings"?

(Anonymous) 2014-03-30 11:42 pm (UTC)(link)
I would agree with your comment that there's no such thing as a ridiculous "trigger". However, expecting warnings for everything under the sun, because someone somewhere is triggered, does actually make for ridiculous "trigger warnings".

Re: Most ridiculous "trigger warnings"?

(Anonymous) 2014-03-30 11:58 pm (UTC)(link)
The thing is, whenever this stuff comes up there are always some people who do seem to be genuinely mocking the actual trigger and/or the act of warning, rather than the expectation of warning.

There are very few things that have been mentioned in this thread that I'd warn for by default or consider reasonable to expect warnings for; at the same time, there are also very few things in this thread that I'd be unwilling to warn for if one of my friends needed me to. It'd be unrealistic and unwise of them to expect it from the general userbase, sure, but I don't think that either their hypothetical need or my hypothetical courtesy should be considered mock-worthy or 'defeating the purpose' of warnings.