case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2014-04-01 07:03 pm

[ SECRET POST #2646 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2646 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.
[Free! Iwatobi Swim Club]


__________________________________________________



03.
[Love so Life]


__________________________________________________



04.
[the last leg]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Karen Gillian/Doctor Who]


__________________________________________________



06.
[True Detective]


__________________________________________________



07.
[Yume Nikki]


__________________________________________________



08.
[Black Dagger Brotherhood Series]


__________________________________________________



09.
[Mass Effect]


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.










Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 040 secrets from Secret Submission Post #378.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Slightly related

[personal profile] jaybie_jarrett 2014-04-01 11:51 pm (UTC)(link)
I agree that headacanoning everyone who MAYBE COULD BE as autistic as autistic is overdoing it. This is coming from an autistic person.

I'd like to see some more non-stereotypical representation but I'm still very careful about headcanoning characters as that. So far I only have a few serious ones. A big one being Lilo from Lilo and Stitch because she just fits all the symptoms PERFECTLY. But other than that Idk....representation is good and important and all...and headcanoning people as being part of group is well and good if they fit. But projecting it on to EVERYONE is overdoing it and sorta cheapens it in a way.

If that all makes sense...

Re: Slightly related

(Anonymous) 2014-04-02 12:08 am (UTC)(link)
No, I totally agree with this.

Especially seeing as people oversimplify and use outdated stereotypes as their reasoning.

Re: Slightly related

[personal profile] jaybie_jarrett 2014-04-02 12:13 am (UTC)(link)
Yeah. A lot of people tend to assume autistic people are good at math for example or are just like savants.

Stereotypes like that ignore that some autistic people are better in other areas or don't have a'genius IQ' or are mild enough to be able to take care of themselves and live a fairly normal life.
elephantinegrace: (Default)

Re: Slightly related

[personal profile] elephantinegrace 2014-04-02 02:17 am (UTC)(link)
You're right; the lecture was on autism tropes in media, not autism in real life.

Re: Slightly related

[personal profile] jaybie_jarrett 2014-04-02 02:33 am (UTC)(link)
Ahh I see
elephantinegrace: (Default)

Re: Slightly related

[personal profile] elephantinegrace 2014-04-02 01:22 am (UTC)(link)
It was a discussion on autism tropes in media, and I made sure to not assign diagnoses to any characters. I think that idiot was either trying to get attention or trying to get himself expelled. Because the way he was acting was really rude and the class ended up going over because we spent so much time getting him to shut up.