Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2014-04-18 07:35 pm
[ SECRET POST #2663 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2663 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

[Stardust]
__________________________________________________
03. [posted twice]
__________________________________________________
04.

[Elementary]
__________________________________________________
05.

[El Goonish Shive]
__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07. http://i62.tinypic.com/29cxt2a.jpg
[Hadaka Shitsuji, censored porn]
__________________________________________________
08. http://i.imgur.com/XGwxaCR.jpg
[cosplay; no sex but definitely nsfw]
__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12. [ns]
__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
15.

__________________________________________________
16.

[Art by: http://www.deviantart.com/art/Lets-Sing-Together-338248375]
__________________________________________________
17. [SPOILERS for Soul Eater]

__________________________________________________
18. [SPOILERS for captain america: the winter soldier]
[WARNING for rape]

__________________________________________________
19. [WARNING for suicide]

__________________________________________________
20. [WARNING for incest, possible non-con]

Notes:
Late at work again, sorry. Should be back to normal by next week!
Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #380.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 1 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Romantic Subplots
(Anonymous) 2014-04-19 12:56 am (UTC)(link)Basically, there's a reason why "Flash, I love you, but we only have fourteen hours to save the Earth!" is one of my favourite lines ever.
If the main plot is the romance, then obviously none of the above applies.
Re: Romantic Subplots
It's one thing if you have a couple characters who are romantics and prone to distracting themselves from their problems to the point of causing themselves further problems, but not every couple in every story with a romantic subplot can be like this and they often start prioritizing the romance above other more sensible things even when they're characterization should have them responding differently.
Re: Romantic Subplots
I always write romance in the sidelines, because well seeing it as a main plot bores me to DEATH. and seeing as I write what I want to read, I like to think its unlikely that my love plots will take over.
Re: Romantic Subplots
Re: Romantic Subplots
(Anonymous) 2014-04-19 02:32 am (UTC)(link)That just sounds like such a waste. I looked the series up and it seems as though it had a great deal of potential. This sort of writing turns up all the time in YA, SF, fantasy, dystopia (of course - that, and it's nearly impossible to find good paranormal stories that aren't PNR anymore.) A hero who prioritizes romance over more important things, like the survival of entire worlds, is a terrible hero - and if the narrative doesn't acknowledge that, it's probably not a good one overall.
On a more personal note, I can't stand the use of 'yummy' as shorthand for 'attractive'. I mean... really, do you want to date them or *eat* them? (The only time it's forgivable is if the answer is legitimately 'both', because there *probably* aren't enough mantis romances in fiction.)
At any other time it's objectification, which reminds me of my similar dislike for characters talking about their partners as if they were possessions (and that generally doesn't get a corresponding exception - wanting to make someone 'theirs' is closer to slavery than love, technically speaking.)