Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2014-04-29 06:51 pm
[ SECRET POST #2674 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2674 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 044 secrets from Secret Submission Post #382.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: what are your favorite classics?
Re: what are your favorite classics?
i admit i haven't read the whole book, only a few passages. it really is beautifully written. i remember feeling a bit uneasy though. i mean, from a theoretical point of view i understand that fucked up characters are very interesting and that one shouldn't shy away from reading and writing them the way they are, but man, that guy was really fucking creepy.
Re: what are your favorite classics?
I like writing where completely repellent thoughts are expressed in beautiful language and Lolita was what first got me into that when I read it in high school.
Re: what are your favorite classics?
(Anonymous) 2014-04-30 05:08 am (UTC)(link)though on the other hand. . . I read this book for the first time when I was twelve. and no, I was not ready for it. not at all :(
Re: what are your favorite classics?
(Anonymous) 2014-04-30 07:55 am (UTC)(link)I was really into pretty language, ok, and that opening line is so perf, and Humbert's mean observations were so interesting and I was hooked on the voice a long time before I fully caught onto what was happening. then it was too late. by then the D: was already a part of me.
D: D: D:
I read it again about five years later and reading it again actually dispelled a lot of the uglier residues because I was better able to separate author / narrator / reader and better able to appreciate the book's, as distinct from Humbert's, portrayal of Lo. it's a great, great book. but it is not a great book for twelve year olds.