Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2014-07-06 04:04 pm
[ SECRET POST #2742 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2742 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
15.

__________________________________________________
16.

__________________________________________________
17.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 094 secrets from Secret Submission Post #392.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-07-06 08:23 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-07-06 09:01 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-07-06 09:02 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
Or is the point of the secret that SGA, specifically, is not supposed to be a source of sexual fantasies?..
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-07-06 09:32 pm (UTC)(link)Oh okay. Sorry, I completely misread the tone of your comment!
Maybe the OP can answer your questions?
no subject
I actually think the secret was intended to be more of a "dang, this man is hawt and I'm kind of embarrassed to tell my boyfriend how hot I think a fictional character is" thing. I just tend to read everything a bit too literally at this hour.
no subject
That's all I've got. And it still doesn't make terrible sense.
OP
(Anonymous) 2014-07-06 10:00 pm (UTC)(link)Re: OP
Re: OP
(Anonymous) - 2014-07-06 22:43 (UTC) - ExpandRe: OP
Re: OP
(Anonymous) - 2014-07-06 23:58 (UTC) - ExpandRe: OP
Re: OP
(Anonymous) - 2014-07-06 22:33 (UTC) - ExpandRe: OP
(Anonymous) - 2014-07-06 23:00 (UTC) - ExpandRe: OP
(Anonymous) - 2014-07-06 23:12 (UTC) - ExpandRe: OP
(Anonymous) - 2014-07-06 23:33 (UTC) - ExpandRe: OP
(Anonymous) - 2014-07-06 23:45 (UTC) - ExpandRe: OP
(Anonymous) - 2014-07-06 23:48 (UTC) - ExpandRe: OP
(Anonymous) - 2014-07-06 23:55 (UTC) - ExpandRe: OP
(Anonymous) - 2014-07-06 23:56 (UTC) - ExpandRe: OP
(Anonymous) - 2014-07-07 03:26 (UTC) - ExpandRe: OP
Re: OP
(Anonymous) 2014-07-06 10:36 pm (UTC)(link)Re: OP
(Anonymous) 2014-07-07 09:29 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
He looked outstanding in his dress uniform, too.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-07-06 09:14 pm (UTC)(link)I have to admit that I quite preferred both Sheppard and Lorne in their uniforms.
(Anonymous) 2014-07-06 09:20 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-07-06 10:09 pm (UTC)(link)Modern combat and combat-ish uniforms like Stargate uses don't appeal as much. They mostly attempt to keep their wearers alive by protecting and/or making them less of a target, and therefore usually tend towards bulky and drab. My appreciation for them is more practical than aesthetic, in the end.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-07-06 10:37 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-07-06 10:44 pm (UTC)(link)