[ SECRET POST #2748 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2748 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.












Notes:

Early because ... World Cup! No other excuse.

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 087 secrets from Secret Submission Post #393.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

They aren't rapists though

[insanenoodlyguy]

Telepaths are. Every telepath is a rapist if you think about it. And you are a rape apologist you fuck.

Re: They aren't rapists though

[skippydelicious]

Well now, Mystique could be. She has potential. I mean if she impersonates someone and has sex without disclosing she is not the person she is impersonating, then that is rape. It is obtaining sex by deception, which fits the rape statute in a lot of places (in Israel, for example, if you are Palestinian and do not disclose that, and someone even thinks you might be Jewish and has sex with you, then you can be arrested for rape; even if it was otherwise entirely consensual).

Tw rape

[(Anonymous)]

Evn though the media treated the case as 'poor Palestine, evil Israel,' the Palestinian actually did rape her.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-11329429

Re: Tw rape

[(Anonymous)]

Holy crap, it is worse than it seems. Not only was there a massive cover up by the Israeli prosecutor, it turns out that the woman accuses rape as a hobby and couldn't even properly remember what she was supposed to be testifying about, according to the article you linked. The accused was railroaded into a plea deal to avoid the hobby-accusations coming out in court.

Re: Tw rape

[(Anonymous)]

And she bruised her own body?

Re: Tw rape

[(Anonymous)]

So you read the article and the conclusion you came to was she made it all up? This is why people say there's rape culture.

Re: Tw rape

[(Anonymous)]

That poor girl :(

Re: They aren't rapists though

[(Anonymous)]

Would that make every mutant with deadly powers a murderer?

Re: They aren't rapists though

[skippydelicious]

Only if there was intent or negligence, otherwise it is manslaughter.

Re: They aren't rapists though

[insanenoodlyguy]

No. The mutant who can freeze you isn't a murderer if he's not freezing anybody.

A telepath goes around raping nearly everybody in their sphere of influence, then has the gall to be insulted when somebody wears a helmet to keep them from doing that.

A telepath who didn't rape wouldn't be a rapist, this is true. But half of them rape without even trying and the ones in that picture do it intentionally.

Re: They aren't rapists though

[(Anonymous)]

Except telepaths usually can't help overhearing thoughts, and have to do special training to repress them.

Re: They aren't rapists though

[insanenoodlyguy]

just because they can't help it doesn't mean we aren't right to fear and shun them. Maybe that guy who freezes people could do us a favor and end the terror by killing the rapist.

Re: They aren't rapists though

[(Anonymous)]

Is reading your sister's diary raping her?

Re: They aren't rapists though

[(Anonymous)]

Moot point when all of my sisters diary entry's are about me having raped her.

Re: They aren't rapists though

[skippydelicious]

Imagine you have a person with an uncontrollable tic that makes them slap people unless they strap your arm down. If that person wanders around knowing they could accidentally scratch someone's eyes out and actually does injure someone, then that person is heading for jail because they knew they had the potential for injury and did nothing. Same applies to telepaths, if they wander around thoughtsdropping and do nothing to actively train themselves not to (note in the Marvel-verse, yes they can train themselves to tune out) then they are showing the same callous disregard.

And that is just with passive telepathy. If they are doing Emma-comics-Frost's fave trick of screwing with a person's mind and leaving all sorts of nasty little booby traps on certain words and rewriting personality, then they ought to be facing old sparky.

Re: They aren't rapists though

[(Anonymous)]

So if a guy with Tourette's swears at a little girl and makes her cry, he should go to jail?

Re: They aren't rapists though

[skippydelicious]

No. But if a guy with tourettes smacks a little girl around then yeah he should go to jail if there was a way to control the urge to slap.

Re: They aren't rapists though

[(Anonymous)]

But they are not hurting anyone by just reading thoughts. If they used what they read to hurt people (blackmail, cheat, whatever) then yes that is bad.

Re: They aren't rapists though

[(Anonymous)]

okay that's not actually true. My brother has Tourette's and one of his tics is making an involuntary motion with his arms stuck straight out. He ended up getting his fingers tangled up in someone's hair in a store and hurting them. He didn't get in trouble for it. It was an accident.

Re: They aren't rapists though

[anonymous4]

How is hearing somebody's thoughts 'rape'?

Re: They aren't rapists though

[insanenoodlyguy]

Did you want somebody to penetrate your thoughts, to discover every secret you've ever had, worse, to CHANGE those thoughts?

Of course not. You don't want to be raped.

Re: They aren't rapists though

[anonymous4]

But why should that experience be considered 'rape' (as opposed to 'interrogation' and/or 'brainwashing')?

Re: They aren't rapists though

[singie]

I didn't fully understand this either. Could you please elaborate?

Re: They aren't rapists though

[deaalmon]

Calling it rape is 100% for the shock factor associated with the word, not for any real association.

Re: They aren't rapists though

[(Anonymous)]

It's rape if they actually interfere with your thoughts, without permission (change them, block them, booby trap them). Otherwise it's just voyeurism, and although you're using the word just for its shock value I'm sure, I find it really disturbing.