fandomsecrets | [ SECRET POST #2767 ]

⌈ Secret Post #2767 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.

__________________________________________________

02.

__________________________________________________

03.

__________________________________________________

04. [broken]

__________________________________________________

05.

__________________________________________________

06.

__________________________________________________

07.

__________________________________________________

08.

__________________________________________________

09.

__________________________________________________

10.

Notes:

Work. Again. Sorry if response time is slow. :(

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 011 secrets from Secret Submission Post #394.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 1 - too big (also random unsubstantiated claims about famous people) ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

If someone participates in any illegal activity. I don't care how minor someone thinks it is. If they think they're above the law and rules that the majority of us follow then I have no desire to date them.

Even piracy or sodomy?

Piracy? Hell no I'm not dating you. We can be friends, but that's it.

Sodomy? The law for that is prejudiced and outdated, but most would assume that this is not what I'm talking about concerning what the majority follows.

What if they just violate small ordinances? Like driving across empty parking spaces.

or jaywalking

Like I said, it doesn't matter to me. The unwillingness to oblige to basic rules isn't something I find attractive. Jaywalking can seem harmless, but it's a law for a reason. Lots of times a pedestrian crossing at a time when they shouldn't can lead to a discourse in traffic or even an injury. It's my preference and from what I've seen, most people who disregard laws tend to act out and have a sense of entitlement. Not saying it's true for everyone, but from what I've seen it's enough for me to find it unattractive.

What if they're unaware of the law? There are a lot of arbitrary laws out there, many that are obsolete and make no sense but haven't been taken out of the books. Chances are pretty high you've broken some yourself. Not to mention unjust laws that violate human rights.

Sorry, OP, I know this is a shallow dealbreaker thread but you seem to have a really rigid way of thinking that I can't quite wrap my brain around.

If they're unaware, that's completely different. If they didn't know, then their action doesn't come from a sense of entitlement. Likewise, breaking any laws that clearly violate human rights can obviously be excused from this.

It wasn't really obvious though from the way you were talking but I'm glad we cleared that up!

This attitude is a little bit frightening to me. The law isn't what dictates morality and lawmakers are sometimes wrong.

For pointless laws like not being able to walk a duck on Wallstreet? Yes.

For laws that incriminate those who act upon voyeurism, rape, murder, abuse, theft, and a whole lot more? No, those are necessary and people who break these laws are scum.

I'm not sure where I implied that there are no laws worth following...

Hahaha, wow. It always blows my mind when I hear about people who truly think that because something is against the law, it's wrong. It must really screw with you when laws get changed or revoked.

[ SECRET POST #2767 ]

Re: Shallow dealbreakers.

Re: Shallow dealbreakers.

Re: Shallow dealbreakers.

Re: Shallow dealbreakers.

Re: Shallow dealbreakers.

Re: Shallow dealbreakers.

Re: Shallow dealbreakers.

Re: Shallow dealbreakers.

Re: Shallow dealbreakers.

Re: Shallow dealbreakers.

Re: Shallow dealbreakers.

Re: Shallow dealbreakers.

Re: Shallow dealbreakers.