ext_33427 ([identity profile] degrees.livejournal.com) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2007-12-06 04:00 pm

[ SECRET POST #335 ]


⌈ Secret Post #335 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

1.


__________________________________________________



2.
__________________________________________________



3.
__________________________________________________



4.
__________________________________________________



5.
__________________________________________________



6.
__________________________________________________



7.
__________________________________________________



8.
__________________________________________________



9.
__________________________________________________



10.
__________________________________________________



11.
__________________________________________________



12.
__________________________________________________



13.
__________________________________________________



14.
__________________________________________________



15.
__________________________________________________



16.
__________________________________________________



17.
__________________________________________________



18.
__________________________________________________



19.
__________________________________________________



20.
__________________________________________________



21.
__________________________________________________



22.
__________________________________________________



23.
__________________________________________________



24.
__________________________________________________



25.
__________________________________________________



26.
__________________________________________________



27.
__________________________________________________



28.
__________________________________________________



29.
__________________________________________________



30.
__________________________________________________



31.
__________________________________________________



32.
__________________________________________________



33.
__________________________________________________



34.
__________________________________________________



35.
__________________________________________________



36.
__________________________________________________



37.
__________________________________________________



38.
__________________________________________________





Notes:

I'm not actually around, Semagic is doing the work for me, so you guys do the name that fandom! :D

Also... the amount of not posted secrets today worries me. Perhaps some of you could do with a refresher on the rules and regulations?

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 47 secrets from Secret Submission Post #048.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 ] broken link, [ 1 2 3 4 ] not!secrets, [ 1 2 ] not!fandom, [ 1 ] WTF?, [ 1 ] Teal Dear Rant Sans Secret But Amusing Enough To Make A Seperate Category For Because Of The Tattoo.
Next Secret Post: Tomorrow, Friday, December 7th, 2007.
Current Secret Submission Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

[identity profile] sir-hellsing.livejournal.com 2007-12-07 06:18 pm (UTC)(link)
That right there would be what makes it interesting to the Orden cast, I suppose, but I wouldn't blame a reader for feeling uneasy about it, and also I would hope your TB protagonist cast is completely comfortable with the state of things, as playing the canon "winning characters" in an ultimately losing situation might prove...difficult.

I perfectly understand this. But also has to deal with activity and IC-interaction. Protagonists, if they don't have a clear plan or power resources, won't win because they are magically protagonists. In the game, they are in equal level to any character, after all. That's why it's a game in which they don't have authorial intent's automatic advantage. And, as I said before, Orden has almost everyone in ranks and takes like many of the good guys to take down one of them. The numbers are also against them.

If we get more good guys players, then this WILL surely change.

Good thing we have excuses to not DO a masacre the protagonists (mostly: the political background and intrigue they are immersed with).

This isn't TB only happening: Naruto, Bleach, Death Note crews, etc, there's a clear advantage to the villains for sheer power/intelligence level in a neutral ground. This would change, of course, if good guys do some sort of backlash. Astaroth declared Radu a traitor in public, for instance, making have serious consequences in his social life (this is just for reference, that the good guys HAVE been moving. But there's also a problem in HOW to move: Orden's supposely uber secret, MOST of the good guys don't even know they exist/who their members are, etc).

I completely understand the OP's feeling but do you see my point too? I am fully aware Orden is winning, but isn't hard to imagine ways to make it crumble from their acts. Most of good people are new characters and they need to enlist allies before going into a suicidal struggle against seemly well behaved society members. ;)

I do get the point, but also OP should realize TB setting is in itself horribly secretive and adamant with confidential information. That Vatican won't easily cooperate with the Empire when Francesco so close and watching. If they did, it would be OOC. They are also enemies, they have a tentative, secret truce.

I hope you don't think this was an immature answer. I was trying to give you a loose picture of the rp situation (as you're unawere): political intrigue characters who are antagonists arrived, seized allies and control the ground FAR before protagonists are applied.

I know it'll be difficult to get it UNLESS you have been reading since the beginning.

Arby's anon! (Ho shi-- we're branching out!)

(Anonymous) 2007-12-07 06:25 pm (UTC)(link)
I just started following these threads ... and I can't say anything on the RP or the canon (which I know is going to earn me something like "but why o why did you butt in, o arby's anon, bringer of beef and cow tongue?")

The reason why I butt in, kind readers and gentle anons and nongentle anons and other notanons is to comment on protagonists!

I perfectly understand this. But also has to deal with activity and IC-interaction. Protagonists, if they don't have a clear plan or power resources, won't win because they are magically protagonists. is something I must debate about! And say that yes, they do win because they are magically protagonists. Take YuGiOh, for example. The protagonist should, most often, never win! When they do it is a stroke of luck, chance, the villains fucked up, AN ANCIENT SPIRIT INVADED THEIR BRAIN AND STARTED KICKASS CRUISECONTROL! that sort of thing. Protagonists LEVEL UP! JUST in nick of time.

This isn't TB only happening: Naruto, Bleach, Death Note crews, etc, there's a clear advantage to the villains for sheer power/intelligence level in a neutral ground. This would change, of course, if good guys do some sort of backlash. This ties to it as well. Antagonists are supposed to have a sort of 'advantage' but protagonists have that factor X of being protagonists. That's what makes successfully playing antagonists in RPs so difficult. They have to maintain the balance of being their antagonist-y self as well as balance and maintain story atmosphere. They have to compensate and coordinate and work twice as hard as the protagonists. Is this fair? Nah, maybe not. But the very best RPs with antagonists are always the ones where it feels like canon, no matter how slated against the protagonists the situation is! Because you want to be recognizable from an outside perspective.

Pissed off reader syndrome is when something completely left wing appears to happen against authorial atmosphere and intent. It is almost never fair. But it happens and I, as the arby's anon, believe it to be valid.

Would you like fries with that?

Re: Arby's anon! (Ho shi-- we're branching out!)

[identity profile] sir-hellsing.livejournal.com 2007-12-07 06:31 pm (UTC)(link)
is something I must debate about! And say that yes, they do win because they are magically protagonists. Take YuGiOh, for example. The protagonist should, most often, never win! When they do it is a stroke of luck, chance, the villains fucked up, AN ANCIENT SPIRIT INVADED THEIR BRAIN AND STARTED KICKASS CRUISECONTROL! that sort of thing. Protagonists LEVEL UP! JUST in nick of time.

In my honest opinion? That makes it for a bad role playing (and writing too, IMO, I'm not familiar with YuGIOh, so I can't elaborate further opinion).

They have to maintain the balance of being their antagonist-y self as well as balance and maintain story atmosphere. They have to compensate and coordinate and work twice as hard as the protagonists. Is this fair? Nah, maybe not. But the very best RPs with antagonists are always the ones where it feels like canon, no matter how slated against the protagonists the situation is! Because you want to be recognizable from an outside perspective.

But we're in a multifandom rp, not in a canon TB rp, not in the novels (in which SO far, the antagonists HAVE the advantage and then the author died).

Sorry, but I don't agree.

Arby's again

(Anonymous) 2007-12-07 06:39 pm (UTC)(link)
It's totally chill to not agree. You go with that frosty, I'll go with mine. But this might be why people raise some brows at the RP feeling "RCO controlled" (remote operating conventions?) and stagnant. Since protagonists give combo meals of change and antagonists don't move. It's part of the game (in the series, not RP) to balance it out, you know. It's what makes it exciting. WILL SO AND SO TRIUMPH? WHO THE HELL KNOWS? Otherwise there's no knife-edge tension, nothing to stay tuned! for.

Jus' sayin', from my POV there's a reason why the characters might be drawing crit or question marks. And I can say that I've seen it work to be what I thought was rather sexyness in other RPs before.

It's chill if you don't like my definition of sexy! Totally frigid~.

[identity profile] sir-hellsing.livejournal.com 2007-12-07 07:18 pm (UTC)(link)
I know what are you coming from, but is the antagonists who are giving those "combo meals" in this case? If you read threads above, OP has an issue with the GOOD GUYS not doing much.

(frozen comment) Arby's anon has a ps

(Anonymous) 2007-12-07 06:26 pm (UTC)(link)
Isn't Light arguably the DN protagonist? It centers around him, after all. Definitely a more gray and grey sort of scenario, but that's just ketchup.

(frozen comment)

[identity profile] sir-hellsing.livejournal.com 2007-12-07 06:33 pm (UTC)(link)
Light's the main character. But the antagonist. Proganists aren't always the main characters.

(frozen comment) WENDY'S ANON

(Anonymous) 2007-12-07 06:35 pm (UTC)(link)
UH, YEAH. THEY ARE. (http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/protagonist)

(frozen comment) Re: WENDY'S ANON

[identity profile] sir-hellsing.livejournal.com 2007-12-07 06:37 pm (UTC)(link)
Oh yes, my bad. I confused "hero" with main character. Protagonists could or couldn't be the heroes.

(frozen comment) Wendy's anon strikes back!

(Anonymous) 2007-12-07 06:40 pm (UTC)(link)
You seem to be under the impression that being the 'hero' of the story means that a character is fundamentally good! THIS IS NOT TRUE, because, well! Everyone is the hero in their own mind. The protagonist is, BY DEFINITION, the main character of a story. The antagonist is, BY DEFINITION, the person who struggles against the protagonist. Good and evil have nothing to do with it.

(frozen comment) Re: Wendy's anon strikes back!

[identity profile] sir-hellsing.livejournal.com 2007-12-07 07:01 pm (UTC)(link)
I realized already about protagonists and antagonists. Thank you. Heroes do, however, have to do with good traits.

(frozen comment) Re: Wendy's anon strikes back!

(Anonymous) 2007-12-07 07:09 pm (UTC)(link)
HERO =/= HEROIC. THE HERO OF A STORY IS A MAIN CHARACTER. A HERO IN A STORY IS THE DUDE THAT SAVES KITTENS AND KISSES BABIES. THERE IS A DIFFERENCE.

Honestly I think your inability to distinguish this is why it's coming up that your characterization of villains frankly sucks. I KNOW NOTHING OF THIS RP PERIOD, but nobody. NOBODY. EVER THINKS THEY ARE THE VILLAIN. They do not wake up and go OH HELLO I THINK I WILL BE EVIL TODAY AND GO SODOMIZE SMALL CHILDREN WHILE WHISTLING THE NATIONAL ANTHEM. They think! What they do! Is right! And you are obviously too stupid to get that.

(frozen comment) Re: Wendy's anon strikes back!

[identity profile] sir-hellsing.livejournal.com 2007-12-07 07:16 pm (UTC)(link)
If you follow that definition of hero. I had the understanding, a main character could be a hero, an anti hero or a villain in character stock. *shrugs* Most of the time, usually, the main (male) character/protagonist is known as hero, but not always could be considered one (and there's also the pesky narrator trouble).

Drop the caps. Please.

EVER THINKS THEY ARE THE VILLAIN. They do not wake up and go OH HELLO I THINK I WILL BE EVIL TODAY AND GO SODOMIZE SMALL CHILDREN WHILE WHISTLING THE NATIONAL ANTHEM. They think! What they do! Is right! And you are obviously too stupid to get that.

Thank you for your opinion. Pity I don't give a damn for it? :) If you want to start wank, please, do it elsewhere.

(frozen comment) DOING WHAT TASTES RIGHT

(Anonymous) 2007-12-07 07:23 pm (UTC)(link)
I am going by the definition that is in the dictionary. Look it up! Multiple uses for a word? WHO WOULD HAVE THOUGHT? Also, don't knock the cruise control for cool. You know you're just jealous.

But seriously. If your problem is that you are dehumanizing your villain to the point where he is nothing but a caricature of what you think Evil should be, then you are Doing It Wrong. I have read a lot of your other comments. I know the author has said that he fails at "being human." But that does not mean he's not a person. He is going to have motivations, he is going to think he's doing what he's doing for a CAUSE, and he is going to think he is doing it because, in his view, it is the right thing to do. This is how villains work. This is how PEOPLE work. Nobody is as two-dimensional as the person I see described in what you've said.

(frozen comment) Re: DOING WHAT TASTES RIGHT

[identity profile] sir-hellsing.livejournal.com 2007-12-07 07:32 pm (UTC)(link)
I know there's alternative meanings and that hero IS used for main character, but when I speak on roles of morals (not in story) of a protagonist, they can be hero/anti hero/villain. THIS is what I mean in Light's case. He wasn't the "hero" (even if a disturbing amount of FS!people agree with him). I think we had a misunderstanding, that's all. Sorry, I wasn't clear?

But that does not mean he's not a person. He is going to have motivations, he is going to think he's doing what he's doing for a CAUSE, and he is going to think he is doing it because, in his view, it is the right thing to do. This is how villains work. This is how PEOPLE work. Nobody is as two-dimensional as the person I see described in what you've said.

If you have read... you'll noticed I don't PLAY this character who "fails" at being a human being? But I play the villain who is CONTROLLING this character and handed a profile with ALL his layers because, IMO, the OP had a narrow Manga-centric two dimensional view of Dietrich (which is COMPLETELY understandable, because he lacks most of his novel layers).

I was even accused of empathizing with him in this very thread. Which I don't. I think he's really disgusting albeit fascinating.

It was a long thread. Surely was a misunderstanding?

What was criticize mostly was that the bad guys are having advantage with the good guys and I agree completely, but there's a lot of IC reasons they have (including the fact bad guys outnumber them now, which never happened in canon) to have this. THAT could change very soon, we're ALL working on it.

[ MOD INTERJECTION ]

[identity profile] shahni.livejournal.com 2007-12-07 07:35 pm (UTC)(link)
This thread is now frozen. Thank you for turning a good discussion into pointless wank because you obviously have no sense of tact. Have a nice day. :')

McAnon's head/McWall OTP

(Anonymous) 2007-12-07 06:37 pm (UTC)(link)
...actually, I would imagine protagonists are protagonists no matter the setting. Like it or not, a degree of authorial intent ought to be followed in fan work like RP and fan fiction and whatnot. The antagonists are super powerful, certainly, but, you know, there is a reason the underdog is so common a theme. It's not about them logically being the stronger force there, it's about how, in the spirit of storytelling, they are not meant to utterly triumph. Heroes in good stories lose for a reason. A story featuring such a hopeless situation would eventually get disheartening and mundane.

LOL yeah good thing because that'd be what I'd call...to put it politely, a poor decision.

I understand that the antagonists have done this and this and this, but really I don't see the point of the protagonists even being there if there's absolutely nothing they can do, if you are making this into a villain's story. I do hope there is a strong degree of OOC cooperation there, otherwise I'd have to feel so very sorry for your protagonist players indeed.

I obviously haven't! And, hopefully just as obviously, I don't intend to.

Re: McAnon's head/McWall OTP

[identity profile] sir-hellsing.livejournal.com 2007-12-07 06:47 pm (UTC)(link)
See, we'll have to disagree with this. I believe a character should be role played as a character, not as a label. That's just me. Victories and defeats should be given according to their work and plans.

And I don't think the situation is hopeless! Honestly. That was, IMO, an exaggeration. It's not like the bad guys are slaving the good guys. They are nicely apart and occassionaly poke each others. That's it. Why? Because of an intrigue setting and bad guys work on basis of customers (that often cross good guys). Current customers aren't. So. One bad guy (Dietrich) is tricking a good guy (Esther) as he DID before canonically. That's it.

I do hope there is a strong degree of OOC cooperation there, otherwise I'd have to feel so very sorry for your protagonist players indeed.

There is agreement! :D I play Lilith, after all, who is like the dead but BIGGEST hero in her canon. However, she doesn't act unless there's a genocide happening. :/

Re: McAnon's head/McWall OTP

(Anonymous) 2007-12-07 06:56 pm (UTC)(link)
...in the end I think what is coming most strongly into play about this is your love for the villain coinciding with your lack of understanding of what a canon villain (esp. in the case of a story line Trinity Blood which is far less ambiguous than you would think despite the protagonists' setbacks) is for.

LOL YES A CHARACTER IS A CHARACTER IS A CHARACTER can and will be labeled; a story without a protagonist/antagonist formula inevitably encounters problems; no, it absolutely does not matter how much you like or empathize with a villain, because at the end of the day s/he IS an antagonist and any high school literature class could tell you that a protagonist advances a plot while an antagonist stagnates it and is therefore meant to be defeated.

I'm done with this. Absolutely nothing I am saying is getting through to you and I'm honestly beginning to question your intellect, which is a big red internet police alarm to bring this "discussion" to an end.

[identity profile] sir-hellsing.livejournal.com 2007-12-07 07:04 pm (UTC)(link)
As you are being rude, I will too. Have a nice day! :)