ext_33427 (
degrees.livejournal.com) wrote in
fandomsecrets2007-12-07 04:00 pm
[ SECRET POST #336 ]
⌈ Secret Post #336 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
1.
__________________________________________________
2.

__________________________________________________
3.

__________________________________________________
4.

__________________________________________________
5. [ not fandom ]
__________________________________________________
6.

__________________________________________________
7.

__________________________________________________
8.

__________________________________________________
9.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
15.

__________________________________________________
16. [ repeat ]
__________________________________________________
17.

__________________________________________________
18.

__________________________________________________
19.

__________________________________________________
20.

__________________________________________________
21.

__________________________________________________
22.

__________________________________________________
23.

__________________________________________________
24.

__________________________________________________
25.

__________________________________________________
26.

__________________________________________________
27.

__________________________________________________
28.

__________________________________________________
29.

__________________________________________________
30.

__________________________________________________
31.

__________________________________________________
32. [ not!secret ]
__________________________________________________
33.

__________________________________________________
34.

__________________________________________________
35.

__________________________________________________
36.

__________________________________________________
37.

__________________________________________________
38.

__________________________________________________
39.

__________________________________________________
40.

__________________________________________________
41.

__________________________________________________
42.

__________________________________________________
43.

__________________________________________________
44.

__________________________________________________
45.

__________________________________________________
46.

__________________________________________________
47.

__________________________________________________
Notes:
Out again, Christmas shopping/making a buttload of cookies! You know what to do!
Last day to submit for next week!
Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #048.
Secrets Not Posted: 0 broken links, [ 1 ] not!secret, [ 1 ] not!fandom, [ 1 ] repeat.
Next Secret Post: Tomorrow, Saturday, December 7th, 2007.
Current Secret Submission Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Plus, it seems too often female characters are relegated to being plot devices that make a male character seem more appealing, which is fucked up.)
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2007-12-08 01:33 am (UTC)(link)no subject
It's like claiming you don't like apples because they're too purple.
no subject
I just think there are a lot of female characters in general that are written to incite a certain feeling in the hearts of the male audience, and because of that sometimes they're not really able to stand on their own.
no subject
It really makes no sense.
no subject
I'm not exactly condoning accusing every female character of being useless, and it is an unfair thing to say, but it does exist and it's not exactly great.
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2007-12-08 01:38 am (UTC)(link)Am I making sense?
no subject
(Anonymous) 2007-12-08 02:10 am (UTC)(link)no subject
While agree with the fact that the Yamoto personality is disturbing, I honestly think what you're talking about is an entirely different stereotype, which, while it may have some of the same roots is not the same thing, hence why you're getting so many people up in your face about it.
I definitely understand rejecting the stereotype of the female love interest as the weak healer, who is often defined soley by her relation to the male character. However, at the same time, there are good characters who are both partially in that stereotype not because they do not have their own fully fleshed out storyline and character but because they happen to be both A)a love interest and B) a healer.
So, even if they are part of a larger stereotype that I can sort of shake my head at, and while I appreciated moving beyond that box, there's no reason that stereotype should invalidate strong female characters who fit within it. Honestly, some of my misunderstanding (before reading your comments) was centered around defining what is a "good" female character.
My initial impression was that disregarding in some cases valid and well developed characters for partially fitting in an overarching stereotype (even the weak healer/love interest) is part of fandom's constant misogyny for female characters that fall outside what they expect.
In my belief, female characters should be just that - well developed characters, like any other, and that's what they should be judged by. Judging female characters for displaying certain traits then (even if they are part of an overarching stereotype) when they are a perfectly valid character, seems to be a step backwards, much like criticizing modern housewives for not being what we consider a women "should" be now. In other words, it still seems to me a way of judging how women should be
That's just my take on what I've read, and please forgive me if it's a bit confusing! This week is exams week, and I'm operating on 3 hours of sleep. @__@!
And yeah, sorry 'bout the tl;dr
no subject
no subject
But of the characters up there, I can ID 9. None of them is a Nadeshiko. For starters, most of them are far too perky and not graceful enough.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2007-12-08 01:41 am (UTC)(link)We're obviously not on the same page.
no subject
Sure, Yuna is quite high on traits. But she isn't passive, she isn't meek, and she is not there purely to back up Tidus. She's got her own thoughts, her own ideals, and her own goals that do not revolve around kimonos and tea ceremonies and Tidus.
de-anond
Re: de-anond
Re: de-anond
Re: de-anond
Re: de-anond
(Anonymous) - 2007-12-10 01:55 (UTC) - ExpandRe: de-anond
Re: de-anond
(Anonymous) - 2007-12-10 05:52 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
I did a bit of reading about some of the characters I didn't know (some I knew by name/appearance but didn't play the game and some that were mentioned in the comments). Upon gaining further knowledge I'll have to second the sentiments that a good majority of these girls don't really fit the traditional nadeshiko role.
That being said, though, I can understand how some of these characters' traits could annoy someone enough into not liking them and the roles they play in the series.
But yeah, not really nadeshiko, just a bit too perfect in some cases?