case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2014-10-24 07:03 pm

[ SECRET POST #2852 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2852 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.
[Harold and Maude]


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________
















05. [ SPOILERS for Blood of Olympus ]



__________________________________________________



06. [ SPOILERS for The Walking Dead ]
[ WARNING for rape ]



__________________________________________________



07. [ WARNING for rape ]



__________________________________________________



08. [ WARNING for suicide ]





















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #407.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2014-10-24 11:32 pm (UTC)(link)
They should ALL be in jail for the rest of their lives regardless of race (or shot point blank.)

OP

(Anonymous) 2014-10-24 11:33 pm (UTC)(link)
Agreed.
morieris: http://iconography.dreamwidth.org/32982.html (Default)

[personal profile] morieris 2014-10-24 11:40 pm (UTC)(link)
Pretty much. From any high-profile profession as well, not just league sports.

(Anonymous) 2014-10-25 06:42 pm (UTC)(link)
Wait. I think you grossly misread the statement you were replying to. The anon said they should face life imprisonment, not suspension from sports, and suggested that it might be good to just kill them.
morieris: http://iconography.dreamwidth.org/32982.html (Default)

[personal profile] morieris 2014-10-25 07:01 pm (UTC)(link)
That's true, they didn't say they should be suspended or fired.

(Anonymous) 2014-10-24 11:44 pm (UTC)(link)
Oh, absolutely. Let's just shoot everyone who breaks the law.
iceyred: By singlestar1990 (Default)

[personal profile] iceyred 2014-10-25 12:12 am (UTC)(link)
More like execute anyone who proves themselves to be a physical threat to the safety of the population.

(Anonymous) 2014-10-25 12:18 am (UTC)(link)
There's some more really solid logic! What a great way to clear out the prison system.

(Anonymous) 2014-10-25 12:28 am (UTC)(link)
they're pretty much always like this; it's pointless to engage

(Anonymous) 2014-10-25 12:29 am (UTC)(link)
But kind of fun.

(Anonymous) 2014-10-25 12:30 am (UTC)(link)
And you're creating more shit for us to shift through as you do it.

(Anonymous) 2014-10-25 12:34 am (UTC)(link)
Oh, get over yourself. I made one comment and replied to another. You know what this thread's about, so now you can skip over it and move along.
iceyred: By singlestar1990 (Default)

[personal profile] iceyred 2014-10-25 12:37 am (UTC)(link)
You sound angry. Go get a snickers.

(Anonymous) 2014-10-25 12:43 am (UTC)(link)
Yeah, I'm pretty sure that I remember them admitting to trolling before so why even bother? It's not like anyone will change their mind
iceyred: By singlestar1990 (Default)

[personal profile] iceyred 2014-10-25 12:36 am (UTC)(link)
Exactly. We can theoretically get rid of all the serious, dangerous criminal scum, thereby reducing overcrowding in the prisons, making them safer for non-violent criminals, and providing a deterrent to violent crime.

BRB, writing to my congressman.

(Anonymous) 2014-10-25 12:39 am (UTC)(link)
Wah wah wah. Keep whining about a little bit of rough housing just because you can't take it. That's weak.

(Anonymous) 2014-10-25 12:40 am (UTC)(link)
the issue with that is that there are people who are imprisoned for crimes they didn't actually commit. if you try to kill every criminal convicted of a violent crime, you're bound to kill some people who are innocent.

(Anonymous) 2014-10-25 01:34 am (UTC)(link)
Then the question becomes, why are non-violent criminals even in prison? Just shut 'em down!
iceyred: By singlestar1990 (Default)

[personal profile] iceyred 2014-10-25 01:37 am (UTC)(link)
I'm not willing to kill someone who steals a car and goes joyriding. I'm not willing to let them off scot-free either. We'll save prison for people with a chance at being rehabilitated, and bullets for the violent shits of the world.

(Anonymous) 2014-10-25 01:54 am (UTC)(link)
Prison does a shit job at rehabilitation. I'm all for job training, etc., but all joking aside, I think prison for non-violent criminals is the wrong answer.
iceyred: By singlestar1990 (Default)

[personal profile] iceyred 2014-10-25 01:57 am (UTC)(link)
I dunno. Property damage might not physically hurt anybody, but it's still a huge mess and the consequences for the victims can be significant. If somebody stole my car, I would kind of want them to learn that crime is a very, very bad idea.

(Anonymous) 2014-10-25 02:02 am (UTC)(link)
Why, why, WHY, do you guys always fall for this? She's said over and over that she just says these things to get a reaction.
iceyred: By singlestar1990 (Default)

[personal profile] iceyred 2014-10-25 02:31 am (UTC)(link)
I know, right?