Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2014-11-11 06:52 pm
[ SECRET POST #2870 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2870 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

[X-Files]
__________________________________________________
03.

(Doctor Who/Torchwood)
__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

(Benedict Cumberbatch)
__________________________________________________
06.

[Star Trek]
__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

[Star Trek Voyager, "Macrocosm"]
__________________________________________________
10.

[Great British Bake Off series 4, Ruby Tandoh]
__________________________________________________
11.

[How to Get Away with Murder]
__________________________________________________
12.

[Far Cry 3]
__________________________________________________
13.

[Krazy Kat & Ignatz Mouse]
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 047 secrets from Secret Submission Post #410.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 1 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Something Canon Het Shippers Do That Gets Under My Skin
(Anonymous) 2014-11-12 12:42 am (UTC)(link)"Here's a perfect example of a slash fan shitting on a canon het couple to get validation."
And it annoys me for several reasons:
1. Het fans do this as well and use the same tactics as even the worst of slash shippers (see Harmonians or Zutarians if you want examples)
2. You know DAMN well why the reverse isn't true -- because the ratio of slash ships that are canon compared to het ships is UNBELIEVABLY skewed, even if one takes into account that homosexuality/bisexuality is less common than heterosexuality in the general population. So there's no way that het shippers can "shit" on canon slash couples since canon slash couples are so few in number to begin with.
3. Saying that a canon het ship doesn't work for you isn't "shitting" on anything. It's an opinion for God's sake. Unless you're insulting the fans for shipping it or trying to say that het shippers are being bigots for not liking slash (which is asinine), writing out why a het ship doesn't work for you on a personal level isn't shitting on ANYTHING.
Why can't someone write their opinion on a ship without being lambasted with accusations? Of course people spend less time writing essays or meta critical of slash ships. They're not canon. They're not explicitly written into the book or show or movie. Whereas a canon het romance IS an element present in the work that can be evaluated just as readily as the cinematography, the music, a book's pacing, or the plot.
Note: I'm not asking het shippers not to reply back and say why the relationship works for them or why they think it's good writing. But I do wish disliking part of a work wasn't equated with shitting on it and that slash shippers would stop being accused of looking for validation. We KNOW that our ship has no chance of being canon/becoming official. We also know exactly WHY it was never on the table in the first place.
Okay, rant over.
Re: Something Canon Het Shippers Do That Gets Under My Skin
(Anonymous) 2014-11-12 12:44 am (UTC)(link)Re: Something Canon Het Shippers Do That Gets Under My Skin
(Anonymous) 2014-11-12 12:45 am (UTC)(link)Re: Something Canon Het Shippers Do That Gets Under My Skin
Re: Something Canon Het Shippers Do That Gets Under My Skin
(Anonymous) 2014-11-12 12:56 am (UTC)(link)Re: Something Canon Het Shippers Do That Gets Under My Skin
Re: Something Canon Het Shippers Do That Gets Under My Skin
(Anonymous) 2014-11-12 01:09 am (UTC)(link)Re: Something Canon Het Shippers Do That Gets Under My Skin
Re: Something Canon Het Shippers Do That Gets Under My Skin
(Anonymous) 2014-11-12 02:48 am (UTC)(link)Re: Something Canon Het Shippers Do That Gets Under My Skin
(Anonymous) 2014-11-12 01:24 pm (UTC)(link)Shipper wars happen when a vocal minority of the non canon ship fans (not limited to slash fans) are desperate to prove that their ship is the real thing and/or better than the canon het ship, so they start butchering the canon couple to prove their point.
This is what the OP of this thread did in that secret and they seem to be butthurt now, because people understood their tactic and told them so. So they want to be told that they are right and that they weren't 'having petty shipper wars' and 'shitting on the het ship to seek validation for their slash ship'.
Re: Something Canon Het Shippers Do That Gets Under My Skin
(Anonymous) 2014-11-12 02:00 am (UTC)(link)..When in reality Kishimoto is a straight guy with a wife and kids who has never gone to a fan con in his life lol
Re: Something Canon Het Shippers Do That Gets Under My Skin
(Anonymous) 2014-11-12 02:09 am (UTC)(link)None of this matters. Canon vs het doesn't matter. Shipping doesn't matter.
It's all pixels on a screen, and we're going to die anyway. Why waste your energy being angry? Ship what you want to ship and have fun.
Re: Something Canon Het Shippers Do That Gets Under My Skin
This internet vs "real life" dichotomy is just a pet peeve of mine.
Re: Something Canon Het Shippers Do That Gets Under My Skin
(Anonymous) 2014-11-12 03:25 am (UTC)(link)It just annoys me lately more than ever how much importance people attach to fandom things like shipping and whether something is canon, and then they attack each other over those trivial fandom things. When there's so much important stuff that happens IRL. People dying sort of changes your perspective, I guess. I just don't have a lot of patience for it anymore.
Re: Something Canon Het Shippers Do That Gets Under My Skin
(Anonymous) 2014-11-12 02:50 am (UTC)(link)Re: Something Canon Het Shippers Do That Gets Under My Skin
(Anonymous) 2014-11-12 03:22 am (UTC)(link)Re: Something Canon Het Shippers Do That Gets Under My Skin
(Anonymous) 2014-11-12 05:18 am (UTC)(link)Re: Something Canon Het Shippers Do That Gets Under My Skin
(Anonymous) 2014-11-12 06:06 am (UTC)(link)I'm sorry I laughed. I haven't experienced Real Loss(TM) yet, despite my advanced age.
Re: Something Canon Het Shippers Do That Gets Under My Skin
Sorry, that wasn't meant to be so depressing - I mean, enjoy it now that you have it, because you only really realize how wonderful it was when it's gone.
Re: Something Canon Het Shippers Do That Gets Under My Skin
While I tend not to have petty arguments about ships, I can sort of see how you'd divert your frustration to fandom things (while the real cause is actually real life hurt).
Re: Something Canon Het Shippers Do That Gets Under My Skin
(Anonymous) - 2014-11-12 16:38 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Something Canon Het Shippers Do That Gets Under My Skin
Re: Something Canon Het Shippers Do That Gets Under My Skin
(Anonymous) 2014-11-12 04:38 am (UTC)(link)Re: Something Canon Het Shippers Do That Gets Under My Skin
(Anonymous) 2014-11-12 11:21 am (UTC)(link)"slash fan shitting on a canon het couple to get validation."
sorry but there is more than one comment in that thread showing that this is what you did.
You read a secret that was criticizing your ship and you got obviously upset. I get it, do you know how many secrets were made to shit on my ships too? I get your reaction.
I get that you thought, also, it would make you feel better if you started bashing your rival ship and drag their fans into an unnecessary wank about whose ship is the best according to you. Revenge is sweet, you weren't the first doing that here and won't be the last.
What do you exactly want from us, now? You weren't forced to bring other ships in the argument, to defend yours or disagree with the OP. You still did that but now you want us to justify you and you keep bringing that up in the general comments sections.
Re: Something Canon Het Shippers Do That Gets Under My Skin
(Anonymous) 2014-11-12 02:25 pm (UTC)(link)Also, I'm sorry but evaluating romances that are canon is not equal to evaluating things like cinematography, or the plot. There are real life biases that can effect how someone will respond to a romance in ways it won't effect how they respond to cinematography. For example, do you really think someone who is homophobic will objectively evaluate a gay relationship, or that someone who is racist will objectively evaluate an interracial romance or a relationship with two people of color? These are factors that can't be ignored. People don't have to be screaming homophobic or racist commentary to hold problematic viewpoints that might make them not see the "chemistry" between two particular characters, or react negatively to two certain characters being in a relationship.
Basically you can dislike what you want when it comes to the canon of any show or film, but the way you go about disliking it, and what you say and how you act about what you dislike, is going to make people respond to you in different ways. So if you dislike a canon het ship and write one essay about it without any problematic commentary and don't act like those who like it are stupid or uninformed, I'm sure most people won't respond negatively. But if you say things that seem questionable, or if you go on and on about it non stop, or if you, for example, post meta after meta in places that you know pretty much only supporters of the relationship you are picking apart will read and see your meta, that is probably going to get you negative reactions and I think at that point everyone would have a right to call you out on your shit.
Re: Something Canon Het Shippers Do That Gets Under My Skin
(Anonymous) 2014-11-12 10:36 pm (UTC)(link)And I click away with a "fuck that." And also laugh when they act as though they had no idea where all these "defensive shippers" subsequently come from.
Re: Something Canon Het Shippers Do That Gets Under My Skin
(Anonymous) 2014-11-13 04:08 am (UTC)(link)'anti shipping meta'. lol. You couldn't provoke people harder if you tried. What did you expect?
Are you new to the internet?