[ SECRET POST #2945 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2945 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.
[Not a Harem Heaven, It's a Yandere Hell]


__________________________________________________



03.
[Game of Thrones]


__________________________________________________



04.
[In the Flesh]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Hudson Leick as Callisto in Xena, Warrior Princess]


__________________________________________________



06.
[Plebcomics]


__________________________________________________



07.
[Great British Bake Off]


__________________________________________________



08.
[Captain America: The First Avenger]


__________________________________________________



09.
[Binan Koukou Chikyuu Bouei-bu LOVE!]


__________________________________________________



10.
[Queen]













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 048 secrets from Secret Submission Post #421.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[lb_lee]

Enh, I think it's okay. General rule of thumb goes, the longer a time period between movies, the worse it'll be. And we've already done that ONCE with Lucas's prequels.

--Rogan

[otakugal15]

I thought it was the other way around? Longer time means more ability to make it right. Too little time is too little to make things right?

[lb_lee]

Enh, for me, after it's been more than five years, I start getting leery of any further movies. Once it's been more than TEN years, I pretty much assume it'll be awful. Because generally, if it takes that long for a movie to come out, I assume one of the following has happened:

1. A sequel was never planned, and the team is trying to shoehorn something new in.
2. One or more important figures in creating the movie died or were fired, meaning a new creative team is trying to handle it.
3. There has been massive bureaucratic slowdown, possibly involving who owns the rights of what, and the film may have changed hands and creative teams multiple times.

There have been a couple nice surprises for me in other media (for instance, I really enjoyed Alice: Madness Returns, and it came out ten years after the first Alice game) but so far, the rule generally works.

I call it the 'Duke Nukem 4ever' syndrome.

--Rogan

[otakugal15]

I guess it's cause I'm one of those few people who LOVE the Star Wars prequels, along with the Originals. And that I liked Pirates 2, but felt three was kind of bad cause they filmed it literally right after two and the writers had an unfinished script.

Though Star Trek can fit you category, even if I liked aspects of STItD.

[lb_lee]

Well, Pirates 2 only came out three years after the first one, didn't it? That's still a reasonable amount of time. It's only when there's a really long gap between movies that I get suspicious.

I admit, I really didn't care for the new Star Trek movies. Sorry!

[(Anonymous)]

Apple vs IBM

OT vs Prequels

*yawn*

[otakugal15]

*yawns right back*

How's them apples?

[otakugal15]

Also, Apple stinks.