Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2015-02-07 04:12 pm
[ SECRET POST #2957 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2957 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 064 secrets from Secret Submission Post #423.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
But I hate the fact that there had to be a "queer" in it, and that it had to be connected to LGBT+ somehow. If it weren't for these two factors, I might even use it.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-02-07 09:35 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-02-07 09:39 pm (UTC)(link)Why do you need "best friend forever" if you can just say "friend"? It is a friend, isn't it? Or are you going to say it's a specific type of friend, because sometimes people like being specific, but that doesn't apply when it's terms you don't like?
I'm not a fan of throwing queer in there, but having a word for it is not a bad thing in itself
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-02-07 09:47 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-02-07 09:49 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-02-07 09:50 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-02-07 10:11 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-02-07 10:15 pm (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-02-07 22:18 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-02-07 23:33 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-02-08 02:58 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-02-07 22:32 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2015-02-07 09:59 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-02-07 09:51 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-02-07 09:53 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-02-07 10:08 pm (UTC)(link)I don't know what I would call that relationship, though. Not a romance. Not anything with queer in it certainly. There isn't really a word for it.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-02-07 22:27 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-02-08 00:36 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-02-08 00:39 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-02-08 00:55 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-02-08 02:42 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2015-02-08 12:53 am (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-02-07 10:01 pm (UTC)(link)"Friends are the family you get to choose." Better?
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-02-07 10:05 pm (UTC)(link)It would be really weird to apply the label "queer" to two heterosexual cis dudes who are platonic best friends and decide to live together because why-the-hell-not, and have no desire to go get married to a couple of women even if they are attracted to them. Because their sexual orientation has nothing to do with their relationship with each other -- they just personally prefer to live with each other and don't feel any desire to live with romantic partners instead.
It's pretty ridiculous to think that the only way someone would ever choose this living arrangement over living with a romantic partner is if they're not heterosexual. Just because it's rare doesn't mean it's oppressed. And it minimizes the actual experience of actual queer people who do get flack (real, life-impacting flack, not a few "lol, you guys act so gay!" jokes) for their relationships and living arrangements.
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-02-08 02:25 am (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
There really doesn't need to be some special word that connects itself to LGBT.
no subject
I suppose you're right. I mean, I was rather thinking of a situation where you'd want to offer someone to be your queerplatonic partner (as in, a lifemate), but it makes sense to assume that in this case, you'd have such a good understanding with them that you'd explain your idea just fine without using any particular terms.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-02-07 10:56 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-02-07 11:36 pm (UTC)(link)Not sure we really need a label for it, but at least it avoids the queer issue.