Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2015-03-15 03:45 pm
[ SECRET POST #2993 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2993 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
15.

__________________________________________________
16.

__________________________________________________
17.

__________________________________________________
18.

__________________________________________________
19.

__________________________________________________
20.

__________________________________________________
21.

__________________________________________________
22.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 05 pages, 123 secrets from Secret Submission Post #428.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 1 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 - pretty sure these are all the same spammer anon trying to win the non-existent "weirdest fandomsecret/sex fantasy" award. There are more I missed, and some that went up yesterday. If one of these is not the same anon, please PM me ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-03-15 08:27 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(As for a label that ISN'T associated with horrible shit, I'm drawing a blank. "Humanist" is actually worse than "egalitarian." I guess just go without the label?)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-03-15 08:42 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-03-15 08:56 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-03-15 09:19 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-03-15 10:57 pm (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-03-15 23:22 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-03-15 23:43 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-03-16 00:28 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-03-16 00:31 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-03-16 00:53 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-03-16 00:53 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-03-16 00:29 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-03-16 00:57 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-03-16 17:49 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-03-17 21:09 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2015-03-16 06:58 am (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-03-16 13:05 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2015-03-17 01:30 am (UTC)(link)no subject
I'm being serious here. There are self-proclaimed egalitarians who act like dicks...just like members of EVERY MAJOR POLITICAL MOVEMENT EVER.
Why do people insist on defining a group by its extremists? >____>
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-03-15 08:36 pm (UTC)(link)If you insist on dissociating from every movement that has terrible extremists, you're left with pretty much no one to associate with.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-03-15 08:40 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-03-15 08:40 pm (UTC)(link)that's seriously the most subjective argument ever duder
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-03-15 08:51 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
These groups have really different reps with really different audiences. Feminists, for example, have a really bad rap with a lot of people...who are sexist and conservative. I don't know if it's possible to determine in a neutral way which one is the "best" according to the opinion of level-headed, non-bigoted people (presumably the people whose opinions should matter here).
Besides, why would you want to choose an ideology based on its reputation and not its actual tenets?
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-03-15 09:17 pm (UTC)(link)*many of those tenets are from the extreme feminists. I don't want to be associated with them. hence, I am not a feminist.
I still believe in equality for women AND men. i don't think feminism is the way to go to achieve this.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-03-16 09:53 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-03-15 23:22 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-03-15 23:27 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-03-15 23:31 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-03-15 09:25 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-03-15 09:28 pm (UTC)(link)Particularly because the women we owe so much to -- the women who got us the right to vote and fought for equal pay -- called themselves feminists.
I just don't want to see it lost.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-03-16 09:54 am (UTC)(link)no subject
But I'm not going to pretend it doesn't annoy men when people go around parroting basically wrong ideas about what feminism is because they chose to listen to extremists - people other feminists actively decry as extremists - and reject feminism for that reason.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-03-16 04:47 pm (UTC)(link)I mean, I don't label myself as feminist either, but that's after educating myself about the current wave and I sure as hell won't label myself egalitarian.
no subject
very unfortunately typo
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-03-16 04:51 pm (UTC)(link)"It doesn't count! Unlike you, ours are just extremist/no real scotsman! And you're not decrying yours. At least not enough!"
"Dude, can you stop moving the goalposts?"
"We're not moving them, you're moving them!"
And then extrimists from all sides jump in and the goal posts end up everywhere and the reasonable ones flee the playing field before they get hit by said poles.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-03-15 08:34 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-03-15 09:29 pm (UTC)(link)