Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2015-08-18 06:49 pm
[ SECRET POST #3149 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3149 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 071 secrets from Secret Submission Post #450.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Sexual compatibilty
(Anonymous) 2015-08-18 11:32 pm (UTC)(link)That's my guess as to what they might mean, anyway.
Re: Sexual compatibilty
(Anonymous) 2015-08-18 11:41 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Sexual compatibilty
Generally speaking, a relationship in which there is a libido mismatch (and we're talking extremes, here, not, like, person A wants it 5 times a week and person B only wants it 3 times a week. We're talking person A wants it 5 times a week and person B only wants it 2 or 3 times a month) is going to have more problems than one in which libidos are well-matched. And this is, of course, assuming monogamy.
Re: Sexual compatibilty
(Anonymous) 2015-08-19 12:00 am (UTC)(link)Maybe sex turns out to not be as amazing as everyone says it is, and it plummets.
Maybe it turns out to be amazeballsholyshit so much better than they expected and their libido goes soaring.
Maybe the person masturbates all the time but when it comes to sex with a partner they can't be assed.
Maybe the person never masturbates and assumes they have little interest but holy shit sex with a partner is different!
Re: Sexual compatibilty
Re: Sexual compatibilty
(Anonymous) 2015-08-19 01:02 am (UTC)(link)Re: Sexual compatibilty
Do you know how many guys claim they are fucking sex machines because that's what society expects and then it turns out they've got the libido of a wet breadstick?
Re: Sexual compatibilty
(Anonymous) 2015-08-19 12:09 am (UTC)(link)Like, legitimately, it just doesn't make sense to me. Until you have evidence that something is true about yourself, shouldn't you adopt an agnostic point of view? How do you live for any length of time at all, and not come to understand the way that the experience of actually doing a thing can be dramatically different from the way it looks from outside? What kind of benefit is there to thinking this way? It's so strange to me.
Re: Sexual compatibilty
I don't need to have evidence to know something is true about myself (???) to have both experience in understanding others points of view and experience in the subject I'm speaking upon. Meaning I know for a fact that society expects men to be very sexually active ( this isn't even up debate) and I know for a fact that men will lie about their sexual experience and level of desire because they are embarrassed to not be "normal."
Re: Sexual compatibilty
(Anonymous) 2015-08-19 12:22 am (UTC)(link)and, I mean, I get that on some level it's psychological and societal-expectations, but it just seems so obviously fallacious and self-defeating. And if it's a conscious lie, it's just so obviously going to be proved wrong that it just seems pointless.
Re: Sexual compatibilty
Some people believe a lot of things about themselves that are not true, including that they would enjoy having sex very often.