[ SECRET POST #3155 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3155 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 039 secrets from Secret Submission Post #451.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Do you disagree with any popular fandom headcanons/interpretations?

[(Anonymous)]

-any in a coma theory
-most secretly evil theories
-all this really cute and lighthearted show is actually dark and edgy

Re: Do you disagree with any popular fandom headcanons/interpretations?

[leikomgwtfbbq]

Co-freakin'-signed. Esp. the "cute and lighthearted thing is secretly dark and edgy and horrible" ones--those are always the most boring ones, and usually seem to be thrown together by people who can't accept that they just like a cute and lighthearted thing, and thus need to make it into something it's not to make it "acceptable."

Re: Do you disagree with any popular fandom headcanons/interpretations?

[(Anonymous)]

IDK, the cute-and-lighthearted-is-actually-dark-and-edgy thing CAN be pretty fun -- as long as the people doing it are doing it as a fun "hey, wouldn't it be interesting if..." thing, and not taking it that seriously.

Re: Do you disagree with any popular fandom headcanons/interpretations?

[leikomgwtfbbq]

It can be fun then, but all too often, it's the 2edgy kind of people taking it too seriously!

Re: Do you disagree with any popular fandom headcanons/interpretations?

[(Anonymous)]

And they're so often combined with "secretly evil" too. OMG something isn't perfect, that means they're EVUL!

Re: Do you disagree with any popular fandom headcanons/interpretations?

[(Anonymous)]

Agreed with all of these!

I have nothing against "secretly evil" in theory, but most of the time it feels like people don't understand that a good person can have bad sides or done something bad without being evil (or vice versa).

It gets ridiculous when they take the character attempting to do good only for it to later end up badly/make things worse as proof that they're evil. Er, no, typically it just means they can't look into the future or had bad judgment.