Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2015-09-30 06:36 pm
[ SECRET POST #3192 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3192 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 018 secrets from Secret Submission Post #456.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-09-30 10:51 pm (UTC)(link)I didn't think his GoF hair was that bad.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-09-30 11:26 pm (UTC)(link)As for Ron, they did the best they could casting 10 year olds. I think that turned out pretty well. It's Bill's casting that makes me foam at the mouth.
Harry's eyes, though. HARRY'S EYES!!!! Would it have been *that* hard to get green contacts? It wasn't like they were shooting on a budget!
I agree with the hair. All they had to do was let the nearest person ruffle it right before the scene.
no subject
http://www.hypable.com/j-k-rowling-discusses-why-harrys-eyes-didnt-have-to-be-green-cutting-a-scene-from-alfonsos-prisoner-script/
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-10-01 12:17 am (UTC)(link)Fair enough, I wouldn't want him uncomfortable either. Any reason you're heard they didn't decide to make him Mom's match anyway?
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-09-30 11:51 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-09-30 11:45 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-10-01 12:18 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-10-01 01:03 am (UTC)(link)I was agreeing that it wasn't bad, especially when you put it in context.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-10-01 03:12 am (UTC)(link)It makes sense that a studio would think it was a good look for 'random ten year old kid', but it just doesn't work for this particular character.
no subject