Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2015-10-28 05:41 pm
[ SECRET POST #3220 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3220 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 031 secrets from Secret Submission Post #460.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Fandom pet peeves
(Anonymous) 2015-10-28 11:30 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Fandom pet peeves
(Anonymous) 2015-10-28 11:32 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Fandom pet peeves
(Anonymous) 2015-10-28 11:33 pm (UTC)(link)I don't even mind those so much, what gets me is "If you don't ship it, you're just wrong."
Re: Fandom pet peeves
(Anonymous) 2015-10-28 11:46 pm (UTC)(link)Fan culture/gullibility
(Anonymous) 2015-10-28 11:34 pm (UTC)(link)Half of me wants to grab these people by the shoulders and talk some sense into them. The other half is like, why bother? These people are obviously too stupid to recognize when they're being used. Nothing I do is going to make them see the light, so I'll just sit back and bask in the schadenfreude.
Re: Fan culture/gullibility
(Anonymous) 2015-10-28 11:39 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Fan culture/gullibility
(Anonymous) - 2015-10-28 23:41 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Fan culture/gullibility
(Anonymous) - 2015-10-28 23:45 (UTC) - ExpandAgainst my better judgment . . .
"I have almost reached the regrettable conclusion that the Negro's great stumbling block in his stride toward freedom is not the White Citizen's Counciler or the Ku Klux Klanner, but the white moderate, who is more devoted to "order" than to justice; who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of tension to a positive peace which is the presence of justice; who constantly says: "I agree with you in the goal you seek, but I cannot agree with your methods of direct action"; who paternalistically believes he can set the timetable for another man's freedom; who lives by a mythical concept of time and who constantly advises the Negro to wait for a "more convenient season."
The "tone argument" is not simply advising that being an asshole to people is unlikely to make them agree with you. When I first read How to Win Friends and Influence People, I thought it was so obvious that I couldn't believe there needed to be a book about it. Now we've reached a point where basic politeness is genuinely controversial and advocating for it is likely to get you called a troll.
(Inb4 a certain poster with a martyr complex the size of Texas shows up to claim that everyone on FS is just as strident as him, and people only complain about him being rude for . . . some reason.)
Re: Against my better judgment . . .
(Anonymous) 2015-10-29 12:07 am (UTC)(link)Re: Against my better judgment . . .
Re: Against my better judgment . . .
(Anonymous) 2015-10-29 12:10 am (UTC)(link)Re: Against my better judgment . . .
(Anonymous) - 2015-10-29 00:11 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Against my better judgment . . .
Re: Against my better judgment . . .
(Anonymous) - 2015-10-29 00:20 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Against my better judgment . . .
(Anonymous) 2015-10-29 05:17 pm (UTC)(link)If you make them feel shitty about themselves without any way of atonement, with only self-depreciation as means as a good ally (and self-depreciation =/= humility), it'll never work. Sure, the movements should be mainly about supporting marginalized people, but the moment you can't "Win Friends and Influence People" for your cause without
Racism and other -isms support people's ego. We can't WIN without being nice, or at least polite!!
Re: Fandom pet peeves
(Anonymous) 2015-10-29 12:07 am (UTC)(link)Re: Fandom pet peeves
(Anonymous) 2015-10-29 12:50 am (UTC)(link)Re: Fandom pet peeves
(Anonymous) 2015-10-29 12:14 am (UTC)(link)Re: Fandom pet peeves
(Anonymous) 2015-10-29 09:00 am (UTC)(link)Re: Fandom pet peeves
(Anonymous) - 2015-10-29 13:49 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Fandom pet peeves
Re: Fandom pet peeves
(Anonymous) 2015-10-29 01:07 am (UTC)(link)Re: Fandom pet peeves
Re: Fandom pet peeves
Re: Fandom pet peeves
Re: Fandom pet peeves
(Anonymous) 2015-10-29 12:25 am (UTC)(link)tl;dr, Tumblr exists
Re: Fandom pet peeves
(Anonymous) 2015-10-29 12:51 am (UTC)(link)Re: Fandom pet peeves
(Anonymous) 2015-10-29 01:14 am (UTC)(link)Re: Fandom pet peeves
Re: Fandom pet peeves
(Anonymous) 2015-10-29 05:49 am (UTC)(link)Re: Fandom pet peeves
Re: Fandom pet peeves
It isn't even like Mads is a bodybuilder either... They're both solid and fit but neither is huge; they have a decent amount of muscle but it looks very natural and they carry it well.
I love this fandom, but sometimes the writing (And general attitude about certain things) confuses me.
Re: Fandom pet peeves
Re: Fandom pet peeves
Re: Fandom pet peeves
Re: Fandom pet peeves
(Anonymous) 2015-10-29 07:17 am (UTC)(link)I dislike the behavior of the more zealous haters, for sure, but fandom often responds to those people with this weird mob-mentality, social justicey policing bullshit, and I find that a hell of a lot worse.
The female-character example is just one of many. Backlash can occur any time fandom decides a group within fandom has done/is doing something morally or ethically wrong.
Re: Fandom pet peeves
(Anonymous) 2015-10-29 03:45 pm (UTC)(link)