Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2016-01-10 03:35 pm
[ SECRET POST #3294 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3294 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 072 secrets from Secret Submission Post #471.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Epiphanies?
(Anonymous) 2016-01-10 09:35 pm (UTC)(link)Have you have any epiphanies lately, FS? Fandom or RL.
Re: Epiphanies?
(Anonymous) 2016-01-10 09:54 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Epiphanies?
(Anonymous) 2016-01-10 09:59 pm (UTC)(link)"I don't know how to cook or do any of my own housework. I'll just marry a woman who does."
"I don't know how to do taxes or anything related to my own finances. I'll just marry a man who does."
Re: Epiphanies?
(Anonymous) 2016-01-10 10:01 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Epiphanies?
(Anonymous) 2016-01-10 11:41 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Epiphanies?
(Anonymous) 2016-01-10 11:44 pm (UTC)(link)They are artists.
I find occupation says little about how open to new things people are. Even scientists and creative people settle comfortably into a routine and do the same things over and over.
Re: Epiphanies?
(Anonymous) 2016-01-11 06:12 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Epiphanies?
By its very nature, feminist criticism is Doylist as all hell. It's all about the author's choices and the author's message, with very few opportunities to justify things in-universe. But when someone responds to a feminist critique with complete bafflement, their statements regarding the work are usually Watsonian in nature. I've often seen commenters who have no apparent understanding that a Doylist critique is even possible--they respond to every attempt at doing so with increasingly irritated Watsonian explanations, assuming the Doylist is just too stupid to understand what they're talking about.
Re: Epiphanies?
Re: Epiphanies?
(Anonymous) 2016-01-10 10:28 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Epiphanies?
(Anonymous) 2016-01-11 05:05 am (UTC)(link)I mean, both of them are valid ways of liking a work, but when we're talking about criticism & trying to understand a work, the Doylist mode is just better. Because at the end of the day, fictional works are actually created works of fiction which were made and exist in our world. They are not actually descriptions of places that exist. None of the in-universe justifications are actually justifications.
To use your example, it's fun to pretend that Doyle was merely a literary agent, or whatever - but at the end of the day, Doyle did actually write the stories, and Watson and Holmes were actually just fictional characters.
Re: Epiphanies?
Re: Epiphanies?
(Anonymous) - 2016-01-11 06:31 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Epiphanies?
(Anonymous) 2016-01-10 10:02 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Epiphanies?
(Anonymous) 2016-01-10 10:08 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Epiphanies?
Re: Epiphanies?
I guess I'll have to find another way.
Re: Epiphanies?
(Anonymous) 2016-01-10 10:27 pm (UTC)(link)If it's superficial interaction, it definitely won't help.
Re: Epiphanies?
Re: Epiphanies?
(Anonymous) - 2016-01-10 22:34 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Epiphanies?
Re: Epiphanies?
(Anonymous) - 2016-01-10 22:45 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Epiphanies?
Re: Epiphanies?
(Anonymous) - 2016-01-10 23:26 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Epiphanies?
(Anonymous) - 2016-01-11 18:14 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Epiphanies?
(Anonymous) 2016-01-10 10:52 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Epiphanies?
(Anonymous) 2016-01-10 10:58 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Epiphanies?
(Anonymous) - 2016-01-10 23:16 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Epiphanies?
(Anonymous) 2016-01-10 11:04 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Epiphanies?
(Anonymous) 2016-01-10 11:05 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Epiphanies?
(Anonymous) - 2016-01-11 00:28 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Epiphanies?
(Anonymous) - 2016-01-11 01:22 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Epiphanies?
(Anonymous) - 2016-01-10 23:14 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Epiphanies?
(Anonymous) 2016-01-10 11:44 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Epiphanies?
(Anonymous) 2016-01-11 12:26 am (UTC)(link)Re: Epiphanies?
http://chronicpainsolutions.org/your-anxiety-isnt-an-excuse-to-be-an-asshole/
it was a much-needed reminder.
Re: Epiphanies?
(Anonymous) 2016-01-11 02:13 am (UTC)(link)Re: Epiphanies?