Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2016-06-11 03:25 pm
[ SECRET POST #3447 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3447 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 56 secrets from Secret Submission Post #493.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Question thread
(Anonymous) 2016-06-11 08:39 pm (UTC)(link)Mosquito bites (mildly TMI)
(Anonymous) 2016-06-11 08:43 pm (UTC)(link)Is this something that's happened to anyone before? Should I be freaking out or just keep slapping bandaids on it and hope it stops soon?
Re: Mosquito bites (mildly TMI)
I didn't know that was abnormal.
Re: Mosquito bites (mildly TMI)
(Anonymous) - 2016-06-11 20:49 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Mosquito bites (mildly TMI)
Re: Mosquito bites (mildly TMI)
(Anonymous) 2016-06-11 10:48 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Mosquito bites (mildly TMI)
As you get older, sometimes you 'catch' an allergy, or a really mild one gets worse. Don't scratch! :) (I react horribly to insect bites of all kinds, and a month later will still have a red mark.)
Re: Mosquito bites (mildly TMI)
(Anonymous) 2016-06-12 12:29 am (UTC)(link)Re: Question thread
(Anonymous) 2016-06-11 08:54 pm (UTC)(link)I feel like if I post anything over a few words, everyone ignores me. (So about this long, even.)
Re: Question thread
(Anonymous) 2016-06-11 08:58 pm (UTC)(link)I do think longer posts get less attention, though, because a lot of people check from their phones or in short spurts anymore. So they may not have as much time to devote to your posts. However, I've seen a lot of longer posts get attention, too.
Re: Question thread
Re: Question thread
(Anonymous) 2016-06-11 09:01 pm (UTC)(link)And more importantly, people are lazy. Most people just glance at facebook and aren't on it for any deep-dive reading.
Re: Question thread
(Anonymous) 2016-06-11 10:48 pm (UTC)(link)If the point is to just post whatever you're thinking, post what you want and stop getting hung up on the fact that everyone isn't paying attention. You can't make them read your shit any more than they can make you stop posting your shit.
Either way, you need to make peace with your decision.
Re: Question thread
I'm seconding what the other anon said, weird fb algorithms fuck shit up.
otherwise you can try to write a short synposis at the start if your posts are actually need a read more- like "today my cat puked on me". catch their attention, then elaborate. I've also seen people post a picture with a caption, or answer to their own posts with more details.
Re: Question thread
(Anonymous) 2016-06-11 09:00 pm (UTC)(link)Don't get me wrong, he sounds like a horse's ass, and letting that guy off was disgusting, but I'm pretty sure the Bar Association already knows how pissed people are at them....
Re: Question thread
(Anonymous) 2016-06-11 09:02 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Question thread
(Anonymous) 2016-06-11 09:04 pm (UTC)(link)I don't know how judges are appointed in that county, but if there's an election to retain or remove, people should put a shit ton of money behind that.
Re: Question thread
Long (like, really long) answer? People don't know what the heck they're talking about when they talk about petitioning the Bar. The Bar is the licensing agency for lawyers - each state and federal district has one. Speaking generally, the Bar collects professional dues and decides who gets to practice law. They also put on classes so that lawyers can pay more money and learn about the updates to law. Licenses can be either suspended or revoked completely. Generally, you get suspended for either not paying your dues or completing your continuing legal education hours or for a number of criminal/civil infractions. The most common infractions are for mismanaging client funds (they take very serious views on it) or substance abuse that interferes with competently representing their clients to the best of their ability. To get your license revoked, you have to do something VERY serious, like straight up embezzle client money or repeated substance abuse issues or defraud your client - one that gets a lot of press is when district attorneys withhold evidence in criminal trials (a la the Duke lacrosse case). In other words, most things that get your license revoked are criminal in nature.
So, while repugnant, nothing Persky did is a violation of law. It's not even careless or ignorant of the law. He was acting as a judge with the full weight of qualified immunity (meaning he can't be punished for things he does, as long as they are within his job description) within the confines of permissible punishment.
And here's the cherry on top - the The State Bar of California can do exactly NOTHING to Persky. He's a judge. They don't even consider him to be a member of the State Bar while he's on the bench (this is to prevent conflicts of interest between lawyers and judges). If people want to petition anybody, it'd be the Commission on Judicial Performance. They are the ones that review judicial misconduct.
The CJP can only *remove* a judge for actions that "constitute willful misconduct in office, persistent failure or inability to perform the judge's duties, habitual intemperance in the use of intoxicants or drugs, or conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice that brings the judicial office into disrepute." That last one might give people hope, but I'd bet it has to be a pattern before they act. Generally, lawyers and judges don't want to act against someone that they might hear cases with/against/in front of every day. It usually requires horrific injustice for a judge to be removed. Now, they can censure him or publicly/privately admonish him, but that does little to nothing to affect him professionally.
Basically, he's not going to stop being a lawyer. He might, however, stop being a judge - not because of the CJP though, but because of a recall through the voters. For all the naysayers (especially lately), democracy occasionally shifts the status quo. He will be recalled, just as Californian voters did to their governor Gray Davis in 2003. So if you live in his voting district and are registered to vote, THAT is the way to remove him - sign that petition and get that asshat recalled! If you don't, then stand back and bask in the warmth of that democratic movement.
Re: Question thread
(Anonymous) - 2016-06-12 00:49 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Question thread
(Anonymous) 2016-06-11 11:02 pm (UTC)(link)Podcast Agent
Re: Podcast Agent
(Anonymous) 2016-06-11 09:36 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Podcast Agent
Re: Podcast Agent
Re: Podcast Agent
Re: Question thread
(Anonymous) 2016-06-11 09:54 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Question thread
(Anonymous) 2016-06-12 12:50 am (UTC)(link)Re: Question thread
(Anonymous) - 2016-06-12 07:22 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Question thread
(Anonymous) 2016-06-11 10:27 pm (UTC)(link)Does anyone get the skin splitting in summer and can offer any advice? I use gloves to wash my dishes, so it can't be from hand washing. I'm so confused (and my thumb hurts).
Re: Question thread
(Anonymous) 2016-06-11 10:38 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Question thread
(Anonymous) 2016-06-11 10:53 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Question thread
Re: Question thread
(Anonymous) - 2016-06-11 23:05 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Question thread
Re: Question thread
(Anonymous) - 2016-06-12 03:05 (UTC) - Expand