fandomsecrets | [ SECRET POST #3502 ]

⌈ Secret Post #3502 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.

__________________________________________________

02. [ns]

__________________________________________________

03. http://i.imgur.com/pFIrfng.png
[linked for animated / underage? nudity]

__________________________________________________

04. [SPOILERS for Voltron: Legendary Defender]

__________________________________________________

05. [SPOILERS for Pokemon Sun and Moon]

__________________________________________________

06. [SPOILERS for xmen apocalypse]

__________________________________________________

07. [SPOILERS for Stranger Things]

Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #500.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 (listed as “Fallout 4” link to a Desktop file - forgot to upload?) - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

I never thought I'd see a day when the left - THE LEFT!! - considered doxxing fair play.

Very disheartening.

mte. it is wrong and disgusting, no matter whether or not someone "deserves" it.

DA

If I'm an employer and one of my employees who is supposed to represent me and my business is posting white power memes on their facebook or something, I'd damn well want to know.

nayrt but employees represent you when they are being associated with your name (at work, in uniform, etc). They do not represent you on their own personal time.

They do officially or not especially if they're officers or agents or reps of some kind. Because then you become the employer that employs people who post white power memes or who hires agents that don't want to deal with minorities. Especially if you're a small business, it matters.

Yeah, you could say "they don't represent me or my business off the clock" but if you know they do that and still employ them, it reflects on you.

Technically? Private employers have every right to police what their employees do and say in their off time.

Would I work for such an employer? Hell no.

Not really. They don't have a right to "police" anything. They have the right to no longer employ you from their end. While both may result in you being out of a job if you post racist stuff all over your social media, those aren't the same rights.

No, an employer can't make it a rule that you cannot post racist things. You can post all the racist things you want. But good luck finding an employer who will happily continue to pay you if they find you doing it.

Man, listen to yourself.

I am happily doing so. :)

Employers don't owe you a job no matter what you do, that's how reality works.

WTF? Where did I argue they did?

When you implied employers having the right to discontinue employing you if you posted racist stuff all over your Facebook was somehow wrong?

If a job is not owed to you, can you explain why that is wrong in your view?

Where did I imply it was ~wrong~?

Right about when you declared you would never work for ~such an employer~; emphasis mine.

Please explain to me how that means I think it's ~wrong~. This should be good.

Re: Non-fandom Secrets

(Anonymous) - 2016-08-06 00:12 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) - 2016-08-06 00:20 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) - 2016-08-06 00:28 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) - 2016-08-06 00:24 (UTC) - Expand

diet_poison - 2016-08-06 02:01 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) - 2016-08-06 02:37 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) - 2016-08-06 05:23 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) - 2016-08-06 14:20 (UTC) - Expand

diet_poison - 2016-08-08 00:41 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) - 2016-08-06 07:19 (UTC) - Expand

I can see setting this kind of precedent leading to all sorts of problems though.

Not really, people being fired for making the business look bad and literally hurting revenue is not an uncommon occurrence.

That just shows that employers have way too much control over their employees' private lives already. It sounds alright when you're supposedly punishing racists, but what if the employers are the prejudiced ones and use social media to uncover things employees would rather keep to themselves?

I agree.

Sadly I see it more often than I'd like. Remember hellothereracists?

I think maybe doxxing was the wrong word, because it seems anon means more "see the person works for such and such a business and reports it." AFAIK doxxing is more like hacking/stalking.

Yeah if it's reported to the person's employer it's...really not doxxing? Especially if they're employment info was posted in public to begin with?

This. If someone has their employment info listed then...they're representing their employer so running a slight risk.

Hell, I had to attend a full day course which was basically "don't list us as your employer then expect to get away with being a dick". But then, we actually have it written down somewhere to...not do that.

Gets more murky if your employer is not listed though, and such trivial stuff as complaining you have had a long day then your employer slapping you for that...

Wouldn't call it doxxing though.

People who say this usually have something to hide.

Everyone has something to hide.

Yeah, I do. I'm not out at work. I work in education in a country where that is still considered a problem. I can't support handing more power over to employers; it's not like employers can never be the discriminatory dicks and the employees the vulnerable parties or anything.