Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2016-08-25 07:51 pm
[ SECRET POST #3522 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3522 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

[Supernatural]
__________________________________________________
09.

[Miss Fisher's Murder Mysteries]
__________________________________________________
10.

[Star Wars]
__________________________________________________
11.

[Great British Bake Off, series 5]
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 24 secrets from Secret Submission Post #503.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-08-26 12:53 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-08-26 02:28 am (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-08-26 12:02 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-08-26 12:05 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-08-26 12:07 am (UTC)(link)It doesn't cheapen shit. Having more than one ship is not lesser, and having an OTP or single ship isn't better.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-08-26 12:08 am (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-08-26 12:10 am (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-08-26 12:13 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-08-26 12:17 am (UTC)(link)no subject
I guess my response would be:
a) everybody ships differently, and there's nothing wrong with shipping for hotness
b) if you *do* want a reasoning that might make it feel more romantic for you, I think that fandom bicycles often have a lot of chemistry with the other characters (aside from being hot). I know that with some of my multishipping characters, it's because I like different dynamics in each situation, or I just don't see any single character in their show being The One for them. So I vacillate.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-08-26 12:29 am (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-08-26 00:47 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-08-26 12:31 am (UTC)(link)This is how I think the secret maker meant it, too. And I can get where they're coming from with that mindset to some degree. Personally speaking, while I do love to multi-ship, I like to ship characters that I can see having a deep, long-term relationship. There's something special and unique about each pairing I like that I want to capture/see captured in stories about each of those pairings.
That said, however, I'm also completely with you in agreeing that there's nothing wrong with people wanting to ship two characters for hotness' sake, or other reasons of that sort.
And if the secret maker DID mean to imply that by simply multi-shipping in and of itself, fans are cheapening the concept of shipping or things of that sort, then I definitely disagree with them on that.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-08-26 01:23 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-08-26 02:23 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-08-26 02:59 (UTC) - Expandno subject
It's ok if it cheapens it for you, and you don't have to multiship or have bicycles. But people ship and enjoy shipping in different ways, and that's okay.
no subject
But we've all got our own ways of doing fandom and there's no one right way.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-08-26 12:31 am (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-08-26 12:50 am (UTC)(link)A fandom bicycle can be a memetic sex god, but not all memetic sex gods are fandom bicycles.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-08-26 01:08 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-08-26 01:49 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-08-26 20:22 (UTC) - ExpandOP is clueless
(Anonymous) 2016-08-26 06:26 am (UTC)(link)Get it?
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-08-26 05:58 pm (UTC)(link)