Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2016-10-24 06:11 pm
[ SECRET POST #3582 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3582 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

[Miss Fisher's Murder Mysteries]
__________________________________________________
03.

[Daredevil, Wilson Fisk/Vanessa Marianna]
__________________________________________________
04.

[Overwatch]
__________________________________________________
05.

[Mob Psycho 100]
__________________________________________________
06.

[Malcolm in the Middle]
__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 39 secrets from Secret Submission Post #512.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: narrative question
(Anonymous) 2016-10-25 12:56 am (UTC)(link)This is assuming the scene is absolutely essential and not a darling you should murder. I like the solution of the person above who said "have the behavior change and the character have to figure out why."
Re: narrative question
(Anonymous) 2016-10-25 01:02 am (UTC)(link)Ehhhh. Tbh, OP's idea of "surprise, MC is gay!" twist is already a tad heavy-handed as a way to bring the MC and his friend together. Making a fuss over the scene and setting it off with italics or as an "interlude" is only going to make that more conspicuously out of place.
Re: narrative question
(Anonymous) 2016-10-25 01:55 am (UTC)(link)A majority of the story actually even takes place after MC and this friend have broken up romantically (time skips, as I said), but they still have to work together. There's snapshots of the period they were together, but they're all in the past, sort of a "how did we get to here?" I liked my scene as an idea of one of those snapshots/vignettes, but it doesn't quite fit right.
Re: narrative question
(Anonymous) 2016-10-25 02:59 am (UTC)(link)The reason why I said these devices were a little unsubtle was that unless the writing is very good, it's super obvious that this is a contrived obstacle engineered by the author, an easy obstacle that's easily overcome with just one teensy bit of information. This isn't to say it's a bad idea, just that it's probably a good idea NOT to draw any more attention to it than absolutely necessary.
Re: narrative question
(Anonymous) 2016-10-25 07:42 am (UTC)(link)Basically, in the grand scheme of the story, this is unimportant for plot reasons (as you say, getting together is not that big an obstacle), but years later the boyfriend still finds that scene significant for emotional reasons because the older brother was his mentor and it's the last thing he told him before he moved on.
So I'm torn between something that's better-structured and YES THE FEELS.
Re: narrative question
(Anonymous) 2016-10-25 02:52 am (UTC)(link)This^.
I mean, yes, doing something like this probably does bring down the quality of the writing a little bit. But unless you've arbitrarily decided to hold yourself to a particularly high writing standard, then I say go for it.
In my opinion, this is one of those instances where fanfic calls for something different than original published fiction would. If you were writing original published fiction, I suspect your editor would say to make the scene fit smoothly and cohesively into the narrative or else drop it. Because that's the kind of rule professional writing tends to hold itself to quite strictly.
But what makes fanfic enjoyable for the majority of readers is typically more about giving the reader the emotional payoff they want. And it sounds like the scene you're grappling with will strongly contribute to doing that for the reader. To axe it for the sake of "better writing" would be to put the principles of original, professional-caliber writing ahead of the principles of fanfic writing.
Re: narrative question
(Anonymous) 2016-10-25 03:18 am (UTC)(link)DA
(Anonymous) 2016-10-25 07:58 am (UTC)(link)