Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2017-05-20 03:40 pm
[ SECRET POST #3790 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3790 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 45 secrets from Secret Submission Post #543.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-05-20 08:08 pm (UTC)(link)And doing something like using gendered pronouns in a NB headcanon story seems like it just misses the point entirely.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-05-21 02:20 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-05-21 03:01 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-05-20 08:22 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-05-20 08:46 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-05-20 08:47 pm (UTC)(link)I don't think there's any possible way to make "it" less dehumanizing. Just not a viable solution, because it's fundamentally and inextricably dehumanizing.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-05-20 09:18 pm (UTC)(link)Ye - he/she/it/this
Ve - he/she/it/that
Yehe - them/these
Vehe - them/those
It drove me fucking *crazy*, all the time, as a native english speaker, not to be able to differentiate between persons and things. I think expanding 'it' would actually be a much higher psychological bar for most people than accepting a new set of pronouns. (Especially if we go with ey/em, which have a logical conjugation pattern that everyone already knows, unlike ze/xir/whatever.)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-05-20 23:53 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-05-21 03:58 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2017-05-20 08:32 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-05-20 09:08 pm (UTC)(link)Personally, I think most writers under-use character names. I know they're scared of too much repetition and that's why you have all sorts of writing monstrosities like "The blue-eyed boy said" and "the brunette laughed", "the short girl whispered", etc. But there's no way that this stuff is LESS clumsy than just using their damn names.
no subject
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-05-20 10:16 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-05-21 06:48 am (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-05-20 10:37 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-05-20 10:44 pm (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-05-20 22:57 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-05-20 23:04 (UTC) - ExpandOP
(Anonymous) - 2017-05-21 00:10 (UTC) - ExpandRe: OP
Re: OP
(Anonymous) - 2017-05-21 00:55 (UTC) - ExpandRe: OP
(Anonymous) - 2017-05-21 02:06 (UTC) - ExpandRe: OP
(Anonymous) - 2017-05-21 04:12 (UTC) - ExpandOP
(Anonymous) - 2017-05-21 00:00 (UTC) - ExpandRe: OP
Re: OP
(Anonymous) - 2017-05-21 02:08 (UTC) - ExpandRe: OP
Re: OP
(Anonymous) - 2017-05-21 03:59 (UTC) - ExpandRe: OP
(Anonymous) - 2017-05-21 01:01 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-05-21 12:37 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-05-21 01:10 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-05-21 01:20 am (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-05-21 02:36 am (UTC)(link)Huh.
(Anonymous) 2017-05-21 02:01 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-05-21 02:15 am (UTC)(link)no subject
Edit: Actually, realised how it's commonly solved in Glasgow (could be other areas but didn't hear it outside of Scotland) - when it is a group it could be 'theys' or 'their' while when singular it could be 'they' and 'their's'. In dialogue we also use 'you' and 'yous' but that's a different topic. Still - languages are confusing.