Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2017-06-07 06:49 pm
[ SECRET POST #3808 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3808 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

[http://sarahcandersen.com/post/96540470653]
__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 19 secrets from Secret Submission Post #545.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-06-07 10:55 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-06-07 11:02 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-06-07 11:06 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-06-07 11:12 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-06-07 11:22 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
And again, he's 11.
If you show an 11 year old a photo of his dead dad, and he spazes out, you would conclude he believed it was real, right? any adult would make that assumption. Any adult who's not trying to frame the 11 year old as a sociopath lacking human emotions. Then that adult might be inclined to call the kid a faker and say shit like "Oh, he didn't really believe it, tho" like that makes a damn bit of difference. You show a kid a photo of his dad beheaded, the kid screams and gets upset, it is not a logical leap to assume the kid believed it, even if he didn't. even if you wouldn't believe it.
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-06-07 11:13 pm (UTC)(link)It's probably bullshit though
no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-06-07 11:43 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-06-08 12:04 am (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-06-08 12:14 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-06-08 12:08 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-06-08 12:11 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-06-08 12:15 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-06-07 11:13 pm (UTC)(link)But, seriously, this is the same old usage of children as props to make you seem a victim that the right always uses, then conveniently forgets when it could apply to a democrat's child.
no subject
I sincerely hope Barron didn't actually believe for a moment, at 11 years old, that the thing Griffin was holding was his dad's head. Because if so, then someone in that household has failed that poor child.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-06-07 11:28 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-06-08 10:04 am (UTC)(link)(though for real, are we supposed to believe this kid was randomly watching the exact news channel that decided to show the photo uncensored? mmmmmmmmmmmmmm 'kay)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-06-07 11:15 pm (UTC)(link)Think about that for a minute. A grown woman picking on an 11 year old. How classy is that?
no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-06-07 11:19 pm (UTC)(link)no subject