[ SECRET POST #4039 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #4039 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.










Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 24 secrets from Secret Submission Post #578.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[case]

Name the fandom. And repeats, etc.

(If you think something in this thread is a troll, please ignore it! Conversation is fine, but OT wank makes stuff harder to keep track of in this thread. Thanks.)

[(Anonymous)]

why have you not banned "thewakokid"? can he do and say anything he wants? does he control this comm now? yuck.

[(Anonymous)]

I don’t particularly like wako, but I think he’s gross but fairly harmless, unless the boob job thread got a lot nastier than I saw before it went poof. And I’m a cis woman. I do feel a bit sad for his girlfriend unless he’s basically a different person IRL, though.

[(Anonymous)]

There are a lot of women with self esteem issues out there, and wako can be superficially charming when he makes an effort. It's not hard to believe that some poor woman with Stockholm syndrome is being bullied into a boob job as we speak.

[(Anonymous)]

AYRT— *puts on pedant pendant* however much of a troglodyte wako seems, I doubt his girlfriend has begun espousing his beliefs and defending him after he kidnapped her, since apparently, per wako, she identifies as a feminist and argues with him about his beliefs.

I sometimes wonder if they both didn’t settle in different ways. If he went the merely “in shittastic taste” rather than “Woman wakes from coma after ex-boyfriend knocked her out and had unscrupulous cosmetic surgeon perform breast augmentation, ex-boyfriend now awaiting trial pending surgery to reattach severed testicles” route, he could buy his gf a grotesquely padded bra and possibly still end up an ex without being gelded by a surgical scalpel.

[thewakokid]

Troglodyte

I don't know what the means, but thank you!

[(Anonymous)]

I am Wako's girlfriend and usually I stay out of his "shit-posting on the internet" adventures but you must know this is bollocks. Accusing someone of that kind of emotional abuse and implying I have Stockholm Syndrome when you must know very well it's not true is a pretty shitty thing to do.

I can't believe I even have to clarify this when that post was so clearly a joke but I'm not being bullied into a boob job. Nor do I expect to wake up on the 14th of February with massive fake tits. Wako has never been anything but complimentary about my body. Please take your concern trolling out of my personal life.

[(Anonymous)]

then don't whining.

You're being the open one and all sexual over the place. come back again if you feel unconcern.

[(Anonymous)]

Serious question: Are you a Russian bot? You have a rather unique posting style and all of your other threads are about American politics.

[(Anonymous)]

If by "unique" you mean barely if at all legible then yes, they're certainly unique.

[thewakokid]

Hey sweetness! Thanks for backing me, and I'me very happy to see you suspect nothing Know it was all entirely a joke.

[thewakokid]

You think I'm charming? Aw, thats so sweet.

Are you sure you're not thinking of someone else?

But it's not hard to believe lots of things. It's not hard to believe that Michael Cera is a robot sent back from the future to annoy me into committing suicide. There is NO REASON TO BELIEVE IT.

It's not hard to believe any of the millions of conspiracy theories. You don't believe something just because it's easy. You believe something because you have a good reason to.

[thewakokid]

Thank you. I can live with all of that.

And no, my girlfriend, I think, gets my sense of humour. She's the one who laughs the most at the stupid shit I say. You might say she encourages me. At very least she doesn't need it explaining that when I say she's going to wake up in 3 weeks time having undergone consensual and unnecessary surgery, that I am not serious.

[(Anonymous)]

NAYRT but I just want to be really clear about the fact that I found the thread really distasteful and bad while also knowing that it was fiction. I just want to be really clear that there were other reasons people disliked it.

[thewakokid]

That's fair enough. De gustibus non est disputandum and all that. Just find it mind boggling that people seem to consider it as anything resembling a serious proposition. If that's not you, I got no beef with you.

[(Anonymous)]

I don't believe someone like that even HAS a girlfriend. People can lie as easily as they like, on the internet. Like... I could invent a girlfriend too, and people wouldn't probably doubt it.

[thewakokid]

Not arguing with the deletion, but could I get some guidance one which rule the boob job thread broke? Thought it was pretty safe and clear is was a joke.

[case]

A joke can still cross lines and make people very uncomfortable. I'd say joking about forcefully body modding a real and presumably unwilling person counts.

I got it's a joke, if your girlfriend knows it's a joke and thinks its funny then that's great for you two, but in-jokes are in-jokes for a reason. If you and an MMO buddy like to raise your hands and say "Hail" (/h) to each other in the hallway, sure you get it's a joke and they get it's a joke, but random strangers are going to be alarmed because of what that sounds like (and just to add here, they should know what that sounds like! I wouldn't blame the others for being angry at that).

"What would you do if you suddenly woke up with size-H boobs?" would be a okay question.

Yours was more like, "what do you think of my plans to cut up my girlfriend in her sleep and body mod her, and what would you do if it were you? It's a joke (supposedly) but I'm going to act totally serious about theoretically harming a real person"

[cbrachyrhynchos]

I'll suggest that trolling with an old and bad joke that sounds like a Cronenberg rip-off really needs to be put under a cut.

[thewakokid]

I dunno, sounds kinda arbitrary. Like, yes, jokes can make people very uncomfortable, but that literally goes for all jokes. I don't see why a joke centred around one form of violence is any worse than any other joke centred around violence. If I were as much of a dick as people think I am, I could very easily go through every thread about humour and bitch about how X joke makes me offended. It would be the opposite of fun tho. If it's just "Well that's just where I draw the line" that's fair enough, but I'd disagree with where you choose to draw that line.

I also don't think it counts as an in-joke. Like, the absurdity of if should make it clearly not a serious proposition. What if I made a thread about selling humanity out to the alien overloads and how I'm compyling a list of people to go into the work camps when the finally arrive. Is that also too far to be considered a valid comment, because I might be serious about it? Random strangers might also be alarmed by that, but it would be ridiculous for them to be given any credit.

Also: It's a joke (supposedly)

(supposedly)

I mean... There's no "(supposedly)" about it. Like... I can't tell if this means you think really really badly of me, or if you live in a horrifying world where that seems like it could ever be anything other than a joke.

Anyway, point is, seems my thing crossed an arbitrary, which, yeah fair enough, you're the arbiter here just know that given that's the case I can't guarantee that I won't cross that line again.

[case]

"what do you think of my plans to cut up my girlfriend in her sleep and body mod her, and what would you do if it were you? It's a joke (supposedly) but I'm going to act totally serious about theoretically harming a real person"

The supposedly there was me speaking in the voice of the people who found it distasteful and offensive and/or didn't get it was a joke. I was trying to tell you what it sounded like.

And no, it wasn't really arbitrary at least for me - the key factor there was at the end. In (joking) theory, planning to harm a real, specific, existing person and someone that you do have physical access to (planning to amateur-implant boobs on Boris Johnson wouldn't be quite the same since you couldn't actually do it). For example, someone being like "I need plans to kill my boyfriend, any hilarious ideas" then treating it super seriously (as a joke) would get the same reaction.

[thewakokid]

Re: Supposedly. Ah, ok. That makes more sense. Fair enough.

"since you couldn't actually do it"

That's the thing right there: I couldn't do either of them. Does anyone live in a world where it is rational to believe someone could find a surgeon, collect the resources and actually arrange to have surgery performed on an person without discussion and written consent?

See that's why I think it's arbitrary. You have taken something that cannot ever be a seriously feasible thing (Surgery on an unaware and unconsenting adult person) and compared it to something that does happen quite regularly: Murdering your GF/BF (Which, btw, Depending on the presentation could still be considered a funny joke as long as the setup is so far beyond the realms of possibility. For example:

"I'm going to stone my boyfriend to death:



This might take a while.")

I'm sorry, it seems arbitrary to me. Of course it won't to you, since you're the one who made the decision, you based it on somthing, there is some line here, but I'm not seeing it. but there is no difference to me between a joke about one set of horrific scenarios that will never happen, or another. "I'm gonna graft tits on Boris Johnson" vs "I got my girlfriend a surprise cosmetic surgery won't she be surprised when she wakes up!" are both equally absurd.

[case]

Sure, serial killers and things like that who have done those things in real life exist. This isn't to say that you are one, but that you can sound like one, and that "there's no realistic basis for being alarmed that a random person is joking about this" is untrue.

"I'm gonna launch my GF into the sun with a giant slingshot / stone her to death with tiny pebbles" is physically impossible at every step.

"I'm gonna take a knife to my sleeping GF's chest, how would you feel if this happened to you?" is much more possible in the realm of reality. That's why it's distasteful to people - not because of the breast implants, but because the physical harm there is much more doable. Rationality doesn't have much to do with it - you're right that no rational person would do this! But irrational people exist and are everywhere and you end up sounding like one - even if you're not. I'm sure you also don't think everyone on the internet is a perfectly rational person!

I don't think it's particularly difficult to just avoid joking about harming other people (that you realistically have access to and could harm in those ways).

[thewakokid]

"I'm gonna stone her to death with tiny pebbles" is physically impossible at every step.

Challenge fucking accepted!

I suppose I see where you're coming from, but I still think that's a really un-nuanced line to draw. "If your joke was for real and would harm someone you know in real life if you tried it no matter how absurd the attempt would be, then you can't joke about it in case someone thinks you're serious" is, imo, not a good line to draw and gets rid of a lot of potentially fun shit, but if that's the line you want to make a rule of it is at least a solid line and, hell, it's your gig.

[case]

I didn't want to make a line and would've handled it on a case-by-case basis, excuse the pun - but you asked for one.

There is a realistic clause in there for a reason, anyway. No one, rational or irrational, is going to be able to stone someone to death with one tiny pebble at a time, or launch them successfully into the sun. Chloroform and perform surgery on... yeah, that's been done.