case: ([ Zell; Puppyface. ])
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2008-07-15 05:17 pm

[ SECRET POST #557 ]


⌈ Secret Post #557 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

101.


__________________________________________________



102.


__________________________________________________



103.


__________________________________________________



104.


__________________________________________________



105.


__________________________________________________



106.


__________________________________________________



107.


__________________________________________________



108.


__________________________________________________



109.


__________________________________________________



110.


__________________________________________________



111.


__________________________________________________



112.


__________________________________________________



113.


__________________________________________________



114.


__________________________________________________



115.


__________________________________________________



116.


__________________________________________________



117.


__________________________________________________



118.


__________________________________________________



119.


__________________________________________________



120.


__________________________________________________



121.


__________________________________________________



122.


__________________________________________________



123.


__________________________________________________



124. [repeat]


__________________________________________________



125.


__________________________________________________



126.


__________________________________________________



127.


__________________________________________________



128.


__________________________________________________



129.


__________________________________________________



130.


__________________________________________________



131. [repeat]


__________________________________________________



132.


__________________________________________________



133.


__________________________________________________



134.


__________________________________________________



135.


__________________________________________________



136.


__________________________________________________



137.


__________________________________________________



138.


__________________________________________________



139.


__________________________________________________



140.


__________________________________________________



141.


__________________________________________________



142.


__________________________________________________



143.


__________________________________________________



144.


__________________________________________________



145.


__________________________________________________



146.


__________________________________________________



147.


__________________________________________________



148.


__________________________________________________



149.


__________________________________________________



150.


__________________________________________________



151.


__________________________________________________



152.


__________________________________________________



153.


__________________________________________________



154.


__________________________________________________



155.


__________________________________________________



156.


__________________________________________________



157.


__________________________________________________



158.


__________________________________________________



159.


__________________________________________________



160.


__________________________________________________



161.


__________________________________________________



162.


__________________________________________________



163.


__________________________________________________



164.


__________________________________________________



165.


__________________________________________________



166.


__________________________________________________



167.


__________________________________________________



168. [repeat]


__________________________________________________



169.


__________________________________________________



170.


__________________________________________________



171.


__________________________________________________



172.



Notes:

[livejournal.com profile] livelongnmarry - fandom auction type place! For a good cause.
[livejournal.com profile] doctorwhy - A daily webcomic featuring the life and woes of our favourite (tenth regeneration) Time Lord.
[livejournal.com profile] fandom_of_one - An LJ comm for obscure fandoms!

Secrets Left to Post: 10 pages, 249 secrets from Secret Submission Post #080.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 - broken links ], [ 1 2 - not!secrets ], [ 1 2 3 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 1 2 3 - repeat ], [ 1 2 - take it to comments ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: 130

(Anonymous) 2008-07-16 12:19 am (UTC)(link)
I don't get the point of it. Was it supposed to endear us to fandom wank by saying that it isn't about "them?" That they don't instigate things because this supposed secret is doing exactly that. It's not as though you've been on fandom wank recently either. The OP is just trying to stir up shit and it wouldn't surprise me if he/she/it responded to the secret in the comments. Lame.
cleverthylacine: a cute little thylacine (Default)

Re: 130

[personal profile] cleverthylacine 2008-07-16 12:25 am (UTC)(link)
Well, most of the positive responses I've seen to this secret are anonymous. *shrug* It is very lame.

Re: 130

(Anonymous) 2008-07-16 12:38 am (UTC)(link)
That's because you'd write a long screed about how meeeeaaan we are in your LJ and that's honestly more effort than I'm willing to put in to this.

Re: 130

[identity profile] oldfashioned-lj.livejournal.com 2008-07-16 12:46 am (UTC)(link)
Which she would likely keep under flock. So unless you're a friend of hers, you wouldn't have to read it. If you are a friend of hers, then that makes this secret even more pathetic.

Re: 130

(Anonymous) 2008-07-16 12:53 am (UTC)(link)
Hey, I didn't write the secret, I just agree with it. The fact that she'll rant and hold a grudge forever makes it a little bit too much trouble to log in, though, since we share some fandoms.

Re: 130

(Anonymous) 2008-07-16 01:03 am (UTC)(link)
Mmm, maybe if you let go, she would? Just a thought.

Re: 130

(Anonymous) - 2008-07-16 01:08 (UTC) - Expand

Re: 130

(Anonymous) - 2008-07-16 01:15 (UTC) - Expand

Re: 130

(Anonymous) - 2008-07-16 02:18 (UTC) - Expand

Re: 130

(Anonymous) - 2008-07-16 02:29 (UTC) - Expand

Re: 130

[personal profile] cleverthylacine - 2008-07-16 08:34 (UTC) - Expand

Re: 130

(Anonymous) - 2008-07-17 00:57 (UTC) - Expand

Re: 130

(Anonymous) - 2008-07-16 01:16 (UTC) - Expand

Re: 130

(Anonymous) - 2008-07-16 02:20 (UTC) - Expand

Re: 130

(Anonymous) - 2008-07-16 02:31 (UTC) - Expand

Re: 130

(Anonymous) - 2008-07-16 03:01 (UTC) - Expand

Re: 130

(Anonymous) - 2008-07-16 03:15 (UTC) - Expand

Re: 130

[identity profile] oldfashioned-lj.livejournal.com 2008-07-16 01:06 am (UTC)(link)
I wasn't saying you're the OP of the secret. I wrote that if you're a friend of hers, you'd likely be able to read the rant. If you're not, then no matter what fandom you share of hers, you wouldn't have to read it or see it. So it's a moot point to argue.

Re: 130

(Anonymous) - 2008-07-16 01:09 (UTC) - Expand

Re: 130

[identity profile] oldfashioned-lj.livejournal.com - 2008-07-16 01:15 (UTC) - Expand

Re: 130

[personal profile] cleverthylacine - 2008-07-16 01:48 (UTC) - Expand

Re: 130

[identity profile] oldfashioned-lj.livejournal.com - 2008-07-16 02:13 (UTC) - Expand

Re: 130

(Anonymous) - 2008-07-16 02:24 (UTC) - Expand

Re: 130

[identity profile] oldfashioned-lj.livejournal.com - 2008-07-16 02:35 (UTC) - Expand

Re: 130

[identity profile] ayasugi-san.livejournal.com - 2008-07-16 04:19 (UTC) - Expand

Re: 130

[identity profile] oldfashioned-lj.livejournal.com - 2008-07-16 04:20 (UTC) - Expand

Re: 130

[personal profile] cleverthylacine - 2008-07-16 08:33 (UTC) - Expand

Re: 130

[identity profile] oldfashioned-lj.livejournal.com - 2008-07-16 15:55 (UTC) - Expand

Re: 130

[personal profile] cleverthylacine - 2008-07-16 17:00 (UTC) - Expand

Re: 130

[identity profile] oldfashioned-lj.livejournal.com - 2008-07-16 17:19 (UTC) - Expand

Re: 130

[personal profile] cleverthylacine - 2008-07-16 18:09 (UTC) - Expand

Re: 130

[identity profile] oldfashioned-lj.livejournal.com - 2008-07-16 21:30 (UTC) - Expand

Re: 130

(Anonymous) - 2008-07-17 04:50 (UTC) - Expand

Re: 130

(Anonymous) - 2008-07-18 21:05 (UTC) - Expand

Re: 130

[personal profile] cleverthylacine - 2008-07-16 01:49 (UTC) - Expand

Re: 130

(Anonymous) - 2008-07-16 02:25 (UTC) - Expand

Re: 130

(Anonymous) - 2008-07-16 02:38 (UTC) - Expand

Re: 130

(Anonymous) - 2008-07-16 02:44 (UTC) - Expand

Re: 130

(Anonymous) - 2008-07-16 02:55 (UTC) - Expand

Re: 130

(Anonymous) - 2008-07-16 02:59 (UTC) - Expand

Re: 130

(Anonymous) - 2008-07-16 03:01 (UTC) - Expand

Re: 130

(Anonymous) - 2008-07-16 03:03 (UTC) - Expand
cleverthylacine: a cute little thylacine (wtf cat says bwa?)

Re: 130

[personal profile] cleverthylacine 2008-07-16 01:10 am (UTC)(link)
I don't particularly want you to slander me any more than you already have, but if my writing anything in my own LJ constitutes effort for you, then one of three things is going on:

1) you're in some way soul-bonded to me so that you have to write it along with me (which I'm pretty sure isn't true),

OR

2) whatever you want me to think you'd have said is so libellous and evil that my friends would dogpile you and FS wouldn't post it anyway, in which case, good on you for not posting it,

OR

3) you should really stop reading my journal. There's even a nifty little admin console hack that you can use so that you don't even see my comments on things and I suggest you learn to use it so that you never have to pay attention again to any of the people that bother you. And if you're on my friends list you should definitely leave.

Re: 130

[identity profile] crantz.livejournal.com 2008-07-16 01:00 am (UTC)(link)
And you're still not going to get it, are you? I can see why I've seen so many people being frustrated each time you open your mouth.

/was linked here by interested viewers. And I do distinctly recall another linking 'round of you blaming first Heidi Tandy and then, of all people, Michela Ecks for shit. You're kind of weird.
cleverthylacine: a cute little thylacine (Default)

Re: 130

[personal profile] cleverthylacine 2008-07-16 01:55 am (UTC)(link)
Er? Heidi is my friend. Man, this has gotten distorted.

Michela has a problem with me, and vice versa, but Heidi is my friend and I never blamed her for anything.

Re: 130

[identity profile] crantz.livejournal.com 2008-07-16 04:32 am (UTC)(link)
No, no. You blamed a general dislike of you on your friendship with Heidi. Remember?

Re: 130

(Anonymous) 2008-07-16 03:56 pm (UTC)(link)
So who was it that created the pie-chart that showed Ataniell in relation to Heidi? Was it a FW member or Ataniell herself?

Re: 130

[identity profile] crantz.livejournal.com - 2008-07-16 16:17 (UTC) - Expand

Re: 130

(Anonymous) - 2008-07-16 16:22 (UTC) - Expand

Re: 130

[identity profile] crantz.livejournal.com - 2008-07-16 16:53 (UTC) - Expand

Re: 130

(Anonymous) - 2008-07-16 17:26 (UTC) - Expand

Re: 130

(Anonymous) - 2008-07-16 17:38 (UTC) - Expand

Re: 130

(Anonymous) - 2008-07-16 21:13 (UTC) - Expand

Re: 130

(Anonymous) - 2008-07-16 17:31 (UTC) - Expand

Re: 130

[identity profile] ayasugi-san.livejournal.com 2008-07-16 04:23 am (UTC)(link)
*poke* If you can't grow magic internet powers and stop all FW members from trolling ever at all, then someone wants your soul instead (http://community.livejournal.com/fandomsecrets/178113.html?thread=68252609#t68252609).

Re: 130

[identity profile] ayasugi-san.livejournal.com 2008-07-16 04:52 am (UTC)(link)
Are you sure? Are you sure you even have a soul? Because some people probably think you don't.

Anyway! I heard that the best way to get a soul back after losing it is a good old-fashioned mass banning. I recommend finding someone to pretend to share flocked content by email, and ban everyone who asks for the fake content and gives their email address.

Re: 130

[identity profile] crantz.livejournal.com - 2008-07-16 04:56 (UTC) - Expand

Re: 130

[identity profile] ayasugi-san.livejournal.com - 2008-07-16 17:20 (UTC) - Expand

Re: 130

(Anonymous) 2008-07-17 01:38 am (UTC)(link)
Why is it so important to you that she "get it" if this happened a while ago? Do you guys really care that much?

Re: 130

(Anonymous) 2008-07-17 06:39 pm (UTC)(link)
MY E-COCK IN YOUR MOUTH

FOR IT NEEDS A HOME

Re: 130

(Anonymous) 2008-07-16 12:37 am (UTC)(link)
Nah, the point is that they're trying to explain why exactly people make fun of her (whether they're on Fandom_Wank or not). She keeps insisting it's because of Fandom_Wank or Michela or whatever, when the truth is, she's eminently wanky on her own merits, and that's why people make fun of her.

Re: 130

[identity profile] oldfashioned-lj.livejournal.com 2008-07-16 12:45 am (UTC)(link)
How is the secret "her own merits?" The person who made it is obviously a member of fandom wank and bringing about a personal attack on her while, in the same metaphorical breath, is saying that it's because of what she does personally.

(Using my account because I'm sick of having to confirm that I'm a human.)

Re: 130

(Anonymous) 2008-07-16 12:49 am (UTC)(link)
Because members of fandom_wank would never troll a journal or shock! stalk someone on LJ! Perish the thought!

Re: 130

[identity profile] wazira-sharira.livejournal.com 2008-07-16 01:23 am (UTC)(link)
They're not supposed to. I'm not saying they never do, but it's not something encouraged by the community and is as a matter of fact addressed in the rules. Basically, IF members of Fandom Wank are proven to be going and trolling, they're not going to be members of Fandom Wank for much longer.

Re: 130

(Anonymous) 2008-07-16 01:28 am (UTC)(link)
Scroll up there then. Apparently supposed members of FW are just fine with sharing locked material in posts of people they don't like.

Still, it's good to see a sane member of FW come forward. I was starting to wonder if the people here against Ataniell represented the majority mindset.

Re: 130

(Anonymous) - 2008-07-16 02:34 (UTC) - Expand

Re: 130

(Anonymous) - 2008-07-16 02:42 (UTC) - Expand

Re: 130

(Anonymous) - 2008-07-16 05:15 (UTC) - Expand

Re: 130

(Anonymous) - 2008-07-16 16:00 (UTC) - Expand

Re: 130

(Anonymous) - 2008-07-16 17:07 (UTC) - Expand

Re: 130

(Anonymous) - 2008-07-16 17:33 (UTC) - Expand

Re: 130

(Anonymous) - 2008-07-16 17:42 (UTC) - Expand

Re: 130

(Anonymous) - 2008-07-16 17:46 (UTC) - Expand

Re: 130

(Anonymous) - 2008-07-16 18:56 (UTC) - Expand

Re: 130

(Anonymous) - 2008-07-16 19:00 (UTC) - Expand

Re: 130

[personal profile] cleverthylacine - 2008-07-16 06:02 (UTC) - Expand

Re: 130

(Anonymous) - 2008-07-16 17:18 (UTC) - Expand

Re: 130

[personal profile] cleverthylacine - 2008-07-16 18:02 (UTC) - Expand

Re: 130

[identity profile] wazira-sharira.livejournal.com - 2008-07-16 03:00 (UTC) - Expand

Re: 130

(Anonymous) - 2008-07-16 03:17 (UTC) - Expand

Re: 130

[identity profile] ayasugi-san.livejournal.com - 2008-07-16 04:27 (UTC) - Expand
cleverthylacine: a cute little thylacine (Default)

Re: 130

[personal profile] cleverthylacine 2008-07-16 01:53 am (UTC)(link)
http://community.livejournal.com/fandomsecrets/165562.html?thread=60149434#t60149434

The problem that I have with this FW "policy" is that they all troll anonymously.

Every time that I've ever been mentioned on FW, I've had to turn off anon commenting. No way of proving it's them, but finally I just left it off.

I don't know who the person that posted the comment I linked you to is. There's no way to find out or prove it.

But basically taking people, linking to their posts and pointing and laughing is GOING to lead to people going over there. It's unavoidable. You can't say, hey look at the monkey and not think someone is gonna go over there and try to play with it. Human nature.

And since FW enjoys wankers and watching people who are irritated and at the end of their rope freak out and say crazy things because of the dogpiles, they basically make this rule and say they discourage trolling, even though it wouldn't be happening if they didn't do what they do and they totally enjoy the results.

Re: 130

[identity profile] wazira-sharira.livejournal.com - 2008-07-16 02:56 (UTC) - Expand

Re: 130

[personal profile] cleverthylacine - 2008-07-16 05:45 (UTC) - Expand

Re: 130

(Anonymous) 2008-07-16 12:56 am (UTC)(link)
Nah, I agree with the secret. It has nothing to do with who her friends are, or that she ~told FW off~. It's that she overshares, thinks her own experiences are the world's experiences, is a LOL defensive Slytherfen and in general is just extremely wanky without taking into account the fact that she tried to tell a bunch of people who enjoy schadenfruede that they're the Cult of Mean.

Re: 130

[identity profile] oldfashioned-lj.livejournal.com 2008-07-16 01:13 am (UTC)(link)
Let's try this again. She did not write the secret. The secret is obviously trying to instigate wank, otherwise [livejournal.com profile] crantz up there probably wouldn't have been linked to it. The fact that you think she overshares, thinks her own opinions, likes a certain character, etc. is irrelevant. The fact that the secret was made and posted and is a personal attack from someone on fandom wank is relevant.

This isn't her being wanky. This is a member of fandom wank being wanky. So what I'm not understanding here are people (assuming there's actually more than one anonymouse) saying that it's due to her own merits when it took another person posting the secret to bring about wank, albeit in a small degree.

Also, after doing some digging, the things you mentioned came around a long time ago. Why continually bring it up after all this time? Her journal is flocked, she left fandom wank as stated by her own comments, so why continue this?

Re: 130

(Anonymous) - 2008-07-16 02:29 (UTC) - Expand

Re: 130

[identity profile] oldfashioned-lj.livejournal.com - 2008-07-16 02:49 (UTC) - Expand

Re: 130

(Anonymous) - 2008-07-27 23:05 (UTC) - Expand

Re: 130

(Anonymous) - 2008-07-16 20:46 (UTC) - Expand

Re: 130

[identity profile] crantz.livejournal.com - 2008-07-16 04:42 (UTC) - Expand

Re: 130

[identity profile] oldfashioned-lj.livejournal.com - 2008-07-16 16:02 (UTC) - Expand

Re: 130

[identity profile] crantz.livejournal.com - 2008-07-16 16:16 (UTC) - Expand

Re: 130

[identity profile] oldfashioned-lj.livejournal.com - 2008-07-16 16:20 (UTC) - Expand