Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2018-04-02 06:48 pm
[ SECRET POST #4107 ]
⌈ Secret Post #4107 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 28 secrets from Secret Submission Post #588.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2018-04-03 12:12 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2018-04-03 12:34 am (UTC)(link)...Yes, because writing fic about fictional characters fucking and being attracted to one another does not mean that you are attracted to or want to fuck actual real children. Really. The "character" that people are writing about is not the actor, they're a collection of tropes and character traits put into a hypothetical situation.
Do you also think that straight men who watch and get off to M/M/F threesome porn are actually bisexual because they can't be self-inserting as both men at once? Or that lesbians who write M/M fiction are really bisexual even though they're not attracted to actual real men?
To be a pedophile, one has to be attracted to actual. real. children. Someone who writes fic about fictional children, even ones who are played by real children, is not necessarily attracted to real children. Because it's possible to have a healthy understanding of the difference between fiction and reality. Because it's possible to play violent video games and not want to kill people in real life, or have a kink for enemas in fiction but not want to actually be involved with one in real life. Because it really, truly is possible to write and read fic about fictional children while still not being attracted to real children and in fact being disgusted by the thought of sexual activity with real children. Real children and fictional children are different.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2018-04-03 12:52 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2018-04-03 01:30 am (UTC)(link)Actually, I'm mega squicked by underage, which is why I filter out any fic that involves it. But it's still not the same thing as actual pedophilia. Because "You're attracted to these kids and want to see them fuck each other." is not actually what motivates every fic writer! It really isn't! People write fic, sexually explicit fic even, involving characters they are not attracted to and do not want to fuck. There's more to it than that - it can be about dynamics between characters, it can be about characters people identify with and are picturing themselves as, it can be about remembering what it was like to be that age and have crushes and want to have sex, it can even be about actually being that age right now when writing/reading and wanting to see your own feelings reflected. There are so many reasons other than "I am attracted to this character" for writing that kind of thing.
Every straight person who's ever written het has written about characters fucking who they are not attracted to. Not everyone who wants to read about dragons fucking cars wants to fuck dragons or cars themselves.
I've never said that some people writing underage fic aren't pedophiles, although the proportion is probably minuscule. For one thing, actual pedophiles are not going to be satisfied by fic when there is real child porn available. Most people writing and reading underage fic do not seek out real child porn because they are not actually attracted to children. That's the difference. If someone wants to write fic about two characters fucking, but is not attracted to real children and is disgusted by the concept of themselves having sex with real children or of real children in sexual situations, they are not a pedophile. Really.
I'll be bluntly honest. When you pretend that writing fic about fictional children is the same thing as being actually attracted to real children, you are equating two things that are on very different levels in a way that minimises what pedophilia and in particular child molestation (which are two different things as well) actually are.
If someone is not attracted to real life children then they are not a pedophile. There are reasons other than attraction for writing sexually explicit fic. This is very simple.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2018-04-03 02:30 am (UTC)(link)Sure, that's why you're writing paragraphs upon paragraphs defending it and insisting the people who write this trash aren't creepy as shit. You're not fooling anyone.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2018-04-03 02:45 am (UTC)(link)I'm squicked by underage. That doesn't mean I think it should be scourged from the earth, or that literally everyone writing underage is a pedophile.
But I don't actually need to convince you I don't like underage. That doesn't particularly matter to me. The bigger issue here is that you apparently can't conceive of people writing or reading things they don't want to do in real life, which is fucking wild to me. Like, you seriously can't think of any motivation behind writing something that isn't "Oh, I would like this in real life." That's buck wild.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2018-04-03 03:18 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2018-04-03 03:24 am (UTC)(link)I don't care if you think I like underage, even though it's not true - that's why I haven't attempted to prove I don't like it. I care that you think liking underage automatically makes you a pedophile and by extension that liking anything in fiction means you want to do it in real life.
Can you provide any actual rebuttal to the idea that fiction is not the same as reality? Can you provide any reason why writing or reading underage necessitates attraction to children, when people are quite capable of writing and reading sexual content involving people they aren't attracted to? Can you give any actual support to your argument that isn't "ewww grosssss!!!!" Because you haven't so far.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2018-04-03 03:40 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2018-04-03 03:48 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2018-04-03 03:54 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2018-04-03 18:14 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2018-04-04 00:15 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2018-04-03 08:44 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2018-04-03 09:55 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2018-04-03 10:35 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2018-04-03 12:53 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2018-04-03 15:49 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2018-04-04 10:54 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2018-04-03 03:29 am (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2018-04-03 03:33 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2018-04-03 04:45 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2018-04-03 09:42 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2018-04-03 16:58 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2018-04-03 17:19 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2018-04-03 03:36 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2018-04-03 03:44 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2018-04-03 03:53 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2018-04-03 16:31 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2018-04-03 18:09 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2018-04-03 08:51 (UTC) - Expandno subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2018-04-03 03:03 am (UTC)(link)Please, please, learn to distinguish reality from fiction (and maybe turn your indignation to actual paedophiles instead of, you know, people writing fiction who aren't harming real children).
no subject
(Anonymous) 2018-04-03 03:34 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2018-04-03 04:49 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2018-04-03 04:51 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2018-04-03 10:00 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2018-04-04 12:16 am (UTC)(link)da
(Anonymous) 2018-04-03 04:34 am (UTC)(link)Re: da
(Anonymous) 2018-04-03 05:09 am (UTC)(link)Re: da
(Anonymous) 2018-04-03 05:12 am (UTC)(link)So it's okay if they're aged up?
Re: da
(Anonymous) 2018-04-03 09:41 am (UTC)(link)ayrt
(Anonymous) 2018-04-03 05:17 am (UTC)(link)Re: ayrt
(Anonymous) 2018-04-03 09:56 am (UTC)(link)Re: ayrt
(Anonymous) - 2018-04-03 12:58 (UTC) - ExpandRe: ayrt
(Anonymous) - 2018-04-03 18:10 (UTC) - ExpandRe: ayrt
(Anonymous) - 2018-04-04 01:18 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2018-04-03 08:10 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2018-04-03 10:03 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2018-04-03 10:57 am (UTC)(link)It's kind of like how GRRM writes porn of 13 year olds having sex and then goes on to say in interviews that he finds 13 year old book Denaerys "hot" and his ideal woman. Stuff like this makes me question these authors. They're not diddling real kids and I don't suspect they are, but still, ew. But I think anons ITT need to stop making out like pedophilia and child molestation are interchangeable. That seems to be where a lot of the "it's fiction, it's harmless" side is confused.