[ SECRET POST #4309 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #4309 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________


03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.










Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 37 secrets from Secret Submission Post #617.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

I don't really get what's good about the situation tbh

[(Anonymous)]

Some people are into schadenfreude.

[philstar22]

The good part is the she got fired part.

[(Anonymous)]

She's a celebrity with a lot of money so it doesn't really apply here, but the idea that someone's access to money and basic needs can be at the whims of mob justice is terrifying. Doubly with how easy it falsify and misconstruct information now.

[philstar22]

I agree, partially. But in her case, her racism was a public act and not just a matter of taking the word of someone else. She tweeted something extremely racist. Her case is clear cut.

[(Anonymous)]

the idea that someone's access to money and basic needs can be at the whims of mob justice is terrifying

I agree. Capitalism is bad.

[(Anonymous)]

Oh no! Actions have consequences! Specifically, actions that you've previously gotten in trouble for, been warned about, and decide repeat loudly and obnoxiously in public until no one can ignore them anymore have consequences!!

The. Horror.

[(Anonymous)]

Lmao, this so much.

[(Anonymous)]

These snowflakes on the right need to stop whining and acting like victims and learn to take some personal responsibility, if you ask me.

[(Anonymous)]

TBH as someone she hates and kinda wants dead, she can kiss my ass over this. It's not about mob justice, unless you think Neo-Nazis who literally advocate genocide of non-whites shouldn't be fired, too.

[(Anonymous)]

Everyone deserves access to basic needs.

[philstar22]

Yes, they do. But not everyone deserves to be on tv or to be a celebrity or to have a public platform. She has plenty of money. No one is denying her basic needs.

[(Anonymous)]

Smoke a joint outside the police station. You'll get all your basic needs met in jail.

[(Anonymous)]

People lacking access to basic needs is in no way the fault of people (justifiably) yelling at them for doing stupid, awful things. It is a completely bizarre and insupportable idea to blame them for it. It's nonsense, utter nonsense.

[(Anonymous)]

She can rot for all I care. She's a celebrity right now and rich as all hell. She either needs to get down on my level and realize what the masses actually go through before she's disdainful of us, or she can shut the fuck up with her bigotry.

[(Anonymous)]

Oh noooo, the poor racist, sexist, homophobic bigot lost her job. :c Poor bigot getting fired for her own actions. She's just like those homosexuals who get fired because they have same sex partners! Or those people who get fired for not being white! Boo hoo hoo!

[(Anonymous)]

Ordinarily I'd agree, but her case isn't one of those awful misunderstandings that blew out of control. She's been very vocal and unapologetic about her racist, bigoted views that she chose to air repeatedly and publicly. Losing a good gig is the natural outcome of the decisions she made, not some unforeseen tragedy visited upon her by the angry mob.

[(Anonymous)]

Can you name anyone whose access to money and basic needs was at the whim of mob justice on Twitter? Based on something they themselves tweeted? It seems to be all celebrities (plus Jared Padalecki trying and failing to get people fired for not catering to his ego).

[(Anonymous)]

What's this about Jared trying and failing to get someone fired? I have been away from SPN for so long, so I haven't heard about this, and thus far my Google-fu is failing me. Deets, please!

[(Anonymous)]

Justine Sacco is the most prominent case that comes to mind.

[(Anonymous)]

No one is entitled to a job. I have more concern over the dozens of people who she nearly put out of a job, frankly. And I think bringing up completely irrelevant "false" accusations in this context makes no sense, and further invalidates any point you might actually have.

[(Anonymous)]

Some people enjoy watching train wrecks. I wish she'd just shut up and go away, but I'm not holding my breath.

Imagine if Howard Hughes, in the depths of his hoarding his urine in bottles seclusion had been using Twitter or other social media?

[(Anonymous)]

I for one am glad to live in a country where people are able to say stupid shit and not get thrown in jail or killed. Roseanne's words were gross and wrong and she suffered the consequences for them. AS SHE SHOULD.

But at least we don't kill or jail anyone who doesn't say exactly what the ruling party wants. More and more countries are becoming Nanny States where if you say something ignorant or just what the people in power don't agree with they take away your voice. It's a slippery slope when because it's stupid people like Roseanne today and then it's people who don't agree with the government tomorrow.

[(Anonymous)]

God yes, the past few years have made me extremely grateful I don't live in the UK where you can get arrested for tweets.

[(Anonymous)]

I haven't been paying attention to free speech in the U.K. so...omg, getting arrested for tweets?!?